Using "anti-ageing" to market cosmetic surgery: just good business, or another wrinkle on the face of medical practice?

Anne L Ring
Med J Aust 2002; 176 (12): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04592.x
Published online: 17 June 2002

Within the past five years, medical practitioners have seen major changes to the ways in which they are entitled to promote their services in Australia. The current approach was formalised as a result of the State-by-State deregulation of advertising by doctors through concerted action by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), which did so in order to enable equal opportunity to all businesses in compliance with the National Competition Policy.1,2 Box 1 outlines the current conditions for medical advertising.

  • InterAlia Development and Research Enterprises, Corinda, QLD.


  • 1. Walton M. Competition policy and the regulation of the medical profession. Aust Health Consumer 1998; 1: 10-13.
  • 2. Ring A. Cosmetic surgery and the body as work-in-progress. In: Gaskill D, Sanders F, editors. The encultured body: policy implications for healthy body image and disordered eating behaviours. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, 2000: 61-74.
  • 3. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission/Health Care Complaints Commission. Fair treatment: guide to the Trade Practices Act for the promotion of medical and health services. Canberra: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2000.
  • 4. Australian Medical Association. Position statements: advertising and endorsement. Available online through <> (accessed 30 August 2005).
  • 5. Committee of Inquiry into Cosmetic Surgery. The cosmetic surgery report: report to the NSW Minister for Health – October 1999. Strawberry Hills (Sydney): Health Care Complaints Commission, 1999.
  • 6. Ring A. Body imagery in advertising: just unreal — or also unhealthy enough for regulatory action? In: Browne C, Edwards K, Watson V, van Krieken R, editors. TASA 2001 Conference. The Australian Sociological Association Conference Proceedings CD. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2001.
  • 7. Wolf N. The beauty myth. London: Vintage, 1990.
  • 8. Haiken E. Venus envy: a history of cosmetic surgery. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1997.
  • 9. Australian Cosmetic Surgery Magazine. Sydney: Bella Media, 1998-.
  • 10. Ring A. The marketing of cosmetic surgery: doctors and the beauty trade. Aust Health Consumer 1999; 2: 20-22.
  • 11. Anon. Be informed. Australian Cosmetic Surgery Magazine 2002; Issue 15, Feb-Apr: 22.
  • 12. Ring A. The countdown to new heights of sexist ageism in the media of the new world order. In: Alexander M, Harding S, Harrison P, et al, editors. Refashioning sociology: responses to a new world order — TASA conference proceedings. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, 1998: 87-96.
  • 13. Brown L, editor. The new shorter Oxford English dictionary – Vol. 1 (A-M). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
  • 14. NSW HCCC. Cosmetic surgery inquiry transcript [for] 12 April 1999. Strawberry Hills (Sydney): Health Care Complaints Commission, 1999.
  • 15. Good Medicine 2001; October: 4.
  • 16. Australian Women's Weekly 2001; October: 7.
  • 17. Lovelace K. Lift your spirits. Good Medicine 2001; October: 76-79.
  • 18. Anon. Cosmetic fixes. Australian Women's Weekly 2001; October: 132.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.