Health burden of hip and other fractures in Australia beyond 2000

Kerrie M Sanders, Geoffrey C Nicholson, Antony M Ugoni, Julie A Pasco, Ego Seeman and Mark A Kotowicz
Med J Aust 1999; 170 (10): 467-470.
Published online: 6 May 1999


Health burden of hip and other fractures in Australia beyond 2000 Projections based on the Geelong Osteoporosis Study

Kerrie M Sanders, Geoffrey C Nicholson, Antony M Ugoni,
Julie A Pasco, Ego Seeman, and Mark A Kotowicz

MJA 1999; 170: 467-470
For editorial comment, see Morris et al; see also Pocock et al.

Abstract - Introduction - Methods - Results - Discussion - Acknowledgements - References - Author's Detials
- - More articles on Public and environmental health

Abstract Objective: To calculate the expected increase in the number of fractures in adults attributable to the predicted increase in the number of elderly Australians.
Data sources: All fractures in adult residents (> 35 years) of the Barwon Statistical Division (total population, 218 000) were identified from radiological reports from February 1994 to February 1996. The Australian Bureau of Statistics supplied predictions of Australia's population (1996 to 2051).
Main outcome measure: The projected annual number of fractures in Australian adults up to 2051 (based on stable rates of fracture in each age group).
Results: The number of fractures per year is projected to increase 25% from 1996 to 2006 (from 83 000 fractures to 104 000). Hip fractures are projected to increase 36% (from 15 000 to 21 000) because of a substantial rise in the number of elderly aged 85 years and over. Hip fractures are expected to double by 2026 and increase fourfold by 2051.
Conclusions: In contrast to Europe and North America, where numbers of hip fractures are expected to double by 2026 and then stabilise, in Australia hip fractures will continue to place a growing demand on healthcare resources for many decades. These projections can be used for setting goals and evaluating the costs and benefits of interventions in Australia.

Introduction Australia's population is ageing. Thus, diseases such as osteoporosis are affecting a greater proportion of the population. Cost-effective prevention and treatment of fractures will become increasingly important, as the proportion of the "prime working" population (aged 15 to 64 years) is expected to decrease by 7% between 1996 and 2051.1 Estimations of the annual number of fractures will facilitate effective allocation of limited healthcare resources.

Previously, fracture rates in Australia have been extrapolated from rates in Dubbo and Busselton,2,3 populations that may not be representative of the national population as they are both fairly isolated towns with small numbers of men and women in the oldest age groups. Lord et al investigated changes in hip fracture admissions in New South Wales between 1979 and 1990 using International Classification of Diseases hospital discharge codes.4 Although frequently used for ascertaining hip fractures, the limitations of this method are well documented.5,6

The Geelong Osteoporosis Study is a population-based study of age-, sex- and site-specific fracture rate(s) within a well-defined geographic region sufficiently large to establish reliable rates of fracture. It is the largest Australian epidemiological study of adult fractures, identifying 2184 fractures over two years in people aged 35 years and over. Data from the 1996 national census confirm the findings of an earlier study7 that the regional population is typical of the nation in age distribution and socioeconomic range.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics publishes projections of the size, structure and distribution of Australia's population into the next century.1 Assuming stable age- and sex-specific rates of fracture, we have projected annual numbers of fractures by anatomical site in adults over the next 50 years.

Population The Barwon Statistical Division is a region of southern Victoria7 defined by the Australian Bureau of Statistics which includes urban, semi-urban and rural residents and has a population of 218 000 (109 923 aged 35 years and over).

Fracture ascertainment
Using radiological reports from the two medical imaging practices in the region, we identified all fractures in adults (aged 35 years and over) residing within the Barwon Statistical Division over the two-year ascertainment period (17 February 1994 to 16 February 1996). Fractures were identified by a weekly computerised keyword search of all radiological reports. Although radiological services are available at several sites throughout the region, these sites are under the auspices of two medical imaging practices.

Only reports of definite fractures were included as "cases". Reports referring to "likely" or "possible" fracture were not included unless radiologically confirmed at a later date. Vertebral fractures were included in the study on the basis of the radiological report, provided there was no previous record of a fracture at that level. The initial x-ray demonstrating each fracture was sought and the date of fracture was the date of the radiological diagnosis.

As the region is well provided with medical facilities, few fractures would not have been assessed or followed up by services within the region. The standing orders for the ambulance service are to transport patients from residences within the study region to The Geelong Hospital. The study was well advertised and adults who may have sustained fracture(s) while outside the region were asked to contact study coordinators.

Non-residents and patients with pathological fractures (metastatic cancer, Paget's disease and multiple myeloma) were excluded. We have previously reported that the exclusion of high trauma fractures may underestimate the prevalence of bone-fragility fractures in the community,8 so we did not exclude fractures on the basis of trauma classification.

The method of fracture ascertainment has been previously described9 and validated, using hip fracture as a model.10

The study was approved by The Geelong Hospital Human Research and Ethics Advisory Committee.  

Projections We calculated the predicted number of fractures in each five-year age group for men and women as:

Predicted number of fractures =

Number of fractures in the study region
Study region population

X Projected Australian population

X 0.5 (2 year ascertainment)

The study region population was determined from the 1996 Australian Bureau of Statistics census. Annual population projections were also provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.1 This method of projection assumes that the fracture rate in each age group will remain unchanged over time.

Confidence intervals around the projections were calculated by the bootstrap method.11

Results The number of fractures identified in the study population is shown in Table 1.

Projections for all fractures
During the ascertainment period, 2184 adults sustained fractures, producing an age- and sex-adjusted incidence of 102 per 10 000 person-years.

In 1996, we estimate that about 83 000 Australians aged 35 years and over sustained fractures. We predict that by 2006 the total number of fractures per year will increase by 25%, to 104 000 (Figure 1).

Projections for hip fractures
Over the two-year ascertainment period, 428 people sustained hip fractures, producing an age- and sex-adjusted incidence in people aged 35 years and over of 17.2. The number of hip fractures in Australian women is projected to increase from 11 300 per year in 1996 to 44 700 in 2051. In men, the number is projected to rise from 4 000 to 15 300. Figure 2 shows the projection for all people aged 35 years or over.

The number of Australians sustaining hip fractures each year is projected to increase by 15% every five years until 2036, then by about 10% every five years until 2051. A fourfold increase in hip fractures is expected by 2051, when about 23% of Australia's projected population will be aged 65 years and over (compared with 12% in 1996) and over 8% of the population will be aged 85 years and over (compared with 2% in 1996).

Hip fractures are likely to increase more than fractures at other sites because the greatest population growth is expected in the oldest age groups, where the hip is the most common site of fracture.9

Projections for fractures at sites other than the hip
During the ascertainment period, 1756 adults aged 35 years and over sustained fractures at sites other than the hip, producing an age- and sex-adjusted incidence of 77 per 10 000 person-years.

We estimate that in 1996 about 68 000 Australians aged 35 years and over sustained fractures at sites other than the hip, and that the number of non-hip fractures is likely to increase by 9% every five years until 2036, and then by 4% every five years until 2051 (to 147 645 non-hip fractures per year).

Projections for vertebral, Colles, humeral and pelvic fractures (the most common sites of fracture after the hip) are shown in Figure 3. Fractures at these sites are likely to increase more than fractures at other sites where fracture rates do not increase substantially with age.9 Population projections suggest that vertebral, humeral and pelvic fractures will increase by 12% every five years to 2036, then by 6% every five years to 2051. Colles fracture rates increase with age in women, but not in men,8 and the overall number of adults sustaining a Colles fracture will increase by 10% every five years until 2036, then by 5% every five years until 2051.

Fractures other than hip, vertebral, Colles, humeral and pelvic fractures are predicted to increase at about half the rate predicted for these sites (6% every five years until 2036, then 3% every five years until 2051).

Projection of fracture numbers by age group
The number of fractures in adults aged 35 to 59 years is not predicted to change substantially over the projection period, as only a small population increase in this age group is anticipated. By contrast, among those aged 60 years and over, the number of fractures is predicted to increase by at least 10% every five years, and by almost 20% every five years among those aged 85 years and over (Table 2).

Figure 4 shows the projected distribution of hip fractures across age groups for selected years from 1996 to 2051.

Discussion The ageing of the Australian population is increasing the demand for health resources. Health expenditure per person aged 65 years and over is nearly four times higher than for younger individuals ($4900 v $1300).12

It is likely that hip fracture, which becomes increasingly common with advancing age, contributes significantly to this higher expenditure. Almost all people with a fractured hip are hospitalised, with an average length of stay of 13 days.13 Studies in other white populations suggest that 50% of patients who survive hip fracture are discharged to nursing homes, and 25% remain institutionalised one year later.14,15 Comparable Australian data are not available, although the increased mortality after hip fracture has been confirmed.16 We estimate that hip fractures accounted for 0.9% of total government health services expenditure for 1995/96.12 Based on the number of Australian salary earners in 1998 (Australian Bureau of Statistics) and an average cost of $16 000 per hip fracture,17 treatment alone costs salary earners an average of $28 per year. In current dollar terms, this may escalate to $120 per salary earner per year by 2051 if the projected increase is realised.

The number of adults sustaining a hip fracture is likely to more than double from 15 000 in 1996 to 34 000 in 2026, then almost double again by 2051. Fractures at other sites are expected to increase by 70% from 1996 to 2026, then by a further 26% to 2051. These rates of increase are far above the expected growth in total healthcare costs due to the ageing of the Australian population, which is estimated to be 4% every five years for the next 30 to 40 years.18

For the number of hip fractures to remain stable, their incidence (per 10 000 population per year) would need to decline from 17.2 in 19969 to 15.6 in 2001, 14.3 in 2006 and 11.3 in 2026. In the United States, an 18% reduction in hip fracture rates between 1988 to 2000 has been targeted by public health strategists.19 Current therapies (such as hormone replacement therapy and bisphosphonates) may reduce fracture rates by 50%, but their cost-effectiveness remains controversial.20,21

In most white populations the number of hip fractures is predicted to double between 1990 and 2025, and then plateau as the growth in the aged population ceases.22 However, in contrast with Europe and North America, the aged population and the number of hip fractures in Australia and New Zealand are likely to continue to increase from 2025 to 2050.22

Current trends suggest that almost three times as many women as men will sustain a hip fracture (Table 1). Largely for this reason, efforts to prevent hip fracture have focused on osteoporosis in women. However, mortality and rate of institutionalisation after hip fracture is higher in men,23 and increasing hip fracture rates among men, but not women, have been reported.24,25 The projected increased longevity in men suggests that osteoporosis will affect a growing number of Australian men, yet there are no data concerning efficacy of any drug treatment to prevent hip or vertebral fractures in men.26

Our projected number of vertebral fractures is likely to be an underestimate because our ascertainment relied on clinical indications for medical imaging. Between 50% and 75% of vertebral fractures do not come to medical attention.27,28 However, our data are likely to include some previously undiagnosed vertebral fractures that occurred before the ascertainment period. Nevertheless, the predicted number of vertebral fractures represents the number likely to come to medical attention each year. Excluding vertebral fractures does not alter the projected rate increase of all fractures.

The validity of these projections is dependent upon reliable and stable incidence rates and accurate population projections. The major strength of our study was the comprehensive ascertainment of all fractures among adult residents of a defined region representative of Australia.9 A decline in hip fracture rates has recently been reported,19 but other studies have pointed to stable age-specific rates in women and younger men and increasing rates in older men.24,25,29,30

These projections highlight the need to decrease fracture rates among the elderly and can be used for setting goals and evaluating the costs and benefits of interventions in Australia.

This study was supported by the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. We acknowledge the invaluable contributions of the radiologists (D Barry, JM Cameron, PJ Carman, WP Holloway, V Mercuri, PM Motterdam and DB Robertson) and staff at the Geelong Radiological Clinic, as well as the radiologists (NJ Ferris, DO Lun, CB Styles) and staff of the Medical Imaging Department at the Geelong and Colac hospitals. We also wish to thank Biljana Skoric and Soheila Panahi.

  1. McLennan W. Projections of the populations of Australia, States and Territories, 1995-2051. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996: 128. (Catalogue no. 3222.0.)
  2. Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Gilbert C, Eisman JA. Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: The Dubbo osteoporosis study (DOES). Osteoporos Int 1994; 4: 277-282.
  3. Prince RL, Knuiman MW, Gulland L. Fracture prevalence in an Australian population. Aust J Public Health 1993; 17: 124-128.
  4. Lord SR. Hip fractures: changing patterns in hospital bed use in NSW between 1979 and 1990. Aust N Z Surg 1993; 63: 352-355.
  5. Bacon W, Maggi S, Looker A, et al. International comparison of hip fracture rates in 1988-89. Osteoporos Int 1996; 6: 69-75.
  6. Maggi S, Kelsey JL, Litvak J, Heyse SP. Incidence of hip fractures in the elderly: a cross national analysis. Osteoporos Int 1991; 1: 232-241.
  7. Ross KN. The development of the 1984 "Indicator of Disadvantage" and its application to resource allocation decisions for the "Disadvantaged Schools Program" in Australia. Geelong: School of Education, Deakin University, 1984.
  8. Sanders K, Pasco J, Ugoni A, et al. The exclusion of high trauma fractures may underestimate the prevalence of bone fragility fractures in the community: The Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Mineral Res 1998; 13: 1337-1342.
  9. Sanders K, Seeman E, Ugoni A, et al. The age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population based study. Osteoporos Int 1999. In press.
  10. Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Gaudry TM, et al. Identification of incident fractures: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Aust N Z J Med 1999; 29: 203-206.
  11. Efron B, Tibshirani R. The introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
  12. Australia's health 1998: the sixth biennial health report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra: AGPS, 1998.
  13. Abraham B, d'Espaignet E, Stevenson C. Australian health trends 1995. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1995.
  14. Orwoll ES. The special problem of hip fracture. In: Favus MJ, editor. Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 272-282.
  15. Keene G, Parker M, Pryor G. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ 1993; 307: 1248-1250.
  16. Center J, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, et al. Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 1999; 353: 878-882.
  17. Randell A, Sambrook P, Nguyen T, et al. Direct clinical and welfare costs of osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5: 427-432.
  18. Gray R. Insurance: the long term funding of aged care. National Healthcare 1998; 8(4): 32-33.
  19. Melton L, Atkinson EJ, Madhok R. Downturn in hip fracture incidence. Public Health Rep 1996; 111 (March/April): 146-150.
  20. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al. Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 1996; 348: 1535-1541.
  21. Jonsson B, Christiansen C, Johnell O, Hedbrandt J. Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5: 136-142.
  22. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ III. Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992; 2: 285-289.
  23. Sernbo I, Johnell O. Consequences of a hip fracture: A prospective study over 1 year. Osteoporos Int 1993; 3: 148-153.
  24. Melton LJI, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Secular trends in the incidence of hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1987; 41: 57-64.
  25. Bacon W. Secular trends in hip fracture occurrence and survival: Age and sex differences. J Aging Health 1996; 8: 538-553.
  26. Seeman E. Osteoporosis: trials and tribulations. Am J Med 1997; 103 (2A): 74S-87S.
  27. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV. Epidemiology of vertebral osteoporosis. Bone 1992; 13 Suppl 2: S1-S10.
  28. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon M, Melton L. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989. J Bone Min Res 1992; 7: 221-227.
  29. Falch JA, Kaastad TS, Bohler G, et al. Secular increase and geograpical differences in hip fracture incidence in Norway. Bone 1993; 14: 643-645.
  30. Agnusdei D, Camporeale A, Gerardi D, et al. Trends in the incidence of hip fracture in Siena, Italy, from 1980 to 1991. Bone 1993; 14: S31-S34.

(Received 13 Nov 1998, accepted 13 Apr 1999)

Author's Detials University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, Barwon Health-The Geelong Hospital, Geelong, VIC
Kerrie M Sanders, MNutrition, PhD, Research Fellow;
Geoffrey C Nicholson, PhD, FRACP, Professor of Medicine;
Julie A Pasco, PhD, Study Coordinator;
Mark A Kotowicz, FRACP, Senior Lecturer in Medicine.

Department of General Practice and Public Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
Antony M Ugoni, BSc(Hons), Lecturer in Biostatistics.

Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Ego Seeman, MD, FRACP, Associate Professor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne.

Reprints will not be available from the authors.
Correspondence: Dr M A Kotowicz, University Department of Medicine, Barwon Health-Geelong Hospital, PO Box 281, Geelong, VIC 3220.

Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <>".

Back to text

Back to text

Back to text

Back to text

Back to text

Back to text

Received 25 May 2018, accepted 25 May 2018

  • Kerrie M Sanders
  • Geoffrey C Nicholson
  • Antony M Ugoni
  • Julie A Pasco
  • Ego Seeman
  • Mark A Kotowicz



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.