Connect
MJA
MJA

Management of adverse events related to new cancer immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors)

Jack M Bourke, Michael O'Sullivan and Muhammad A Khattak
Med J Aust 2016; 205 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00586
Published online: 7 November 2016

Summary

  • New immunotherapies have significantly improved survival in certain advanced cancers in recent years, particularly metastatic melanoma and lung cancer. The most effective of these therapies are the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab. The use of ICIs will continue to increase in the coming years as evidence of their benefit in a range of other cancers builds.
  • ICIs are associated with novel immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can involve a wide range of organs. The most common irAEs involve the skin (rash, pruritus), gastrointestinal tract (diarrhoea, colitis) and endocrine system (thyroid, pituitary).
  • While severity is generally mild, life-threatening complications can occur if not recognised and treated promptly. Due to the diverse manifestations of irAEs, patients may present to doctors who are not familiar with these drugs, which creates the potential for delays in management.
  • Management of irAEs depends on severity and the organ affected. Systemic steroids are often required and ICI therapy may be withheld or discontinued. Additional immunosuppressive medications may be necessary in steroid-refractory cases.
  • This review provides an overview of the potential toxicities and their management for general clinicians. Broader awareness of these issues among medical professionals will hopefully reduce unnecessary delays in diagnosis and treatment.
  • Patient and carer education regarding irAEs is extremely important; patients and carers should be advised to seek urgent medical attention if required.


  • 1 Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA
  • 2 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA
  • 3 Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, WA



Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 1889-1894.
  • 2. Ryan JM, Wasser JS, Adler AJ, Vella AT. Enhancing the safety of antibody-based immunomodulatory cancer therapy without compromising therapeutic benefit: Can we have our cake and eat it too? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2016; 16: 655-674.
  • 3. Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature 2011; 480: 480-489.
  • 4. Marquez-Rodas I, Cerezuela P, Soria A, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: therapeutic advances in melanoma. Ann Transl Med 2015; 3: 267.
  • 5. Spain L, Diem S, Larkin J. Management of toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 44: 51-60.
  • 6. Weber JS, Kahler KC, Hauschild A. Management of immune-related adverse events and kinetics of response with ipilimumab. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2691-2697.
  • 7. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2521-2532.
  • 8. Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2006-2017.
  • 9. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 23-34.
  • 10. Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 320-330.
  • 11. Rizvi NA, Mazieres J, Planchard D, et al. Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 257-265.
  • 12. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 123-135.
  • 13. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1540-1550.
  • 14. Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2018-2028.
  • 15. Bristol-Meyers Squibb. Key products (Australia). Yervoy (ipilimumab) product information. http://www.bmsa.com.au/products/pages/Home.aspx (accessed Apr 2016).
  • 16. European Medicines Agency. Yervoy. Assessment report – variation. EMA/603930/2013. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Assessment_Report_-_Variation/human/002213/WC500157027.pdf (accessed Sept 2016).
  • 17. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Key products (Australia). Opdivo (nivolumab) product information. http://www.bmsa.com.au/products/pages/Home.aspx (accessed Apr 2016).
  • 18. European Medicines Agency. Keytruda. Assessment report. EMA/444458/2015. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/003820/WC500190992.pdf (accessed Sept 2016).
  • 19. US Food and Drug Administration. Yervoy (ipilimumab) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostMarketDrugsafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/UCM249435.pdf (accessed Sept 2016).
  • 20. MSD. Products. List of all MSD medicines. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) product information. http://www.msd-australia.com.au/products/pages/LOAMMedicines.aspx (accessed Apr 2016).
  • 21. Champiat S, Lambotte O, Barreau E, et al. Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper. Ann Oncol 2016; 27: 559-574.
  • 22. US Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf (accessed Apr 2016).
  • 23. Ludlow SP, Kay N. Delayed dermatologic hypersensitivity reaction secondary to ipilimumab. J Immunother 2015; 38: 165-166.
  • 24. Lacouture ME, Wolchok JD, Yosipovitch G, et al. Ipilimumab in patients with cancer and the management of dermatologic adverse events. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71: 161-169.
  • 25. Belum VR, Benhuri B, Postow MA, et al. Characterisation and management of dermatologic adverse events to agents targeting the PD-1 receptor. Eur J Cancer 2016; 60: 12-25.
  • 26. Voskens CJ, Goldinger SM, Loquai C, et al. The price of tumor control: an analysis of rare side effects of anti-CTLA-4 therapy in metastatic melanoma from the ipilimumab network. PLoS One 2013; 8: e53745.
  • 27. Hua C, Boussemart L, Mateus C, et al. Association of vitiligo with tumor response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. JAMA Dermatol 2016; 152: 45-51.
  • 28. De Felice KM, Gupta A, Rakshit S, et al. Ipilimumab-induced colitis in patients with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res 2015; 25: 321-327.
  • 29. Kim KW, Ramaiya NH, Krajewski KM, et al. Ipilimumab-associated colitis: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: W468-W474.
  • 30. Cheng R, Cooper A, Kench J, et al. Ipilimumab-induced toxicities and the gastroenterologist. J Gatsroenterol Hepatol 2015; 30: 657-666.
  • 31. Kim KW, Ramaiya NH, Krajewski KM, et al. Ipilimumab associated hepatitis: imaging and clinicopathologic findings. Invest New Drugs 2013; 31: 1071-1077.
  • 32. Chmiel KD, Suan D, Liddle C, et al. Resolution of severe ipilimumab-induced hepatitis after antithymocyte globulin therapy. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: e237-e240.
  • 33. Ahmed T, Pandey R, Shah B, Black J. Resolution of ipilimumab induced severe hepatotoxicity with triple immunosuppressants therapy. BMJ Case Rep 2015.
  • 34. Corsello SM, Barnabei A, Marchetti P, et al. Endocrine side effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 1361-1375.
  • 35. Araujo PB, Coelho MCA, Arruda M, et al. Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: review of the literature. J Endocrinol Invest 2015; 38: 1159-1166.
  • 36. Michot JM, Bigenwald C, Champiat S, et al. Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cancer 2016; 54: 139-148.
  • 37. Liao B, Shroff S, Kamiya-Matsuoko C, Tummala S. Atypical neurological complications of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Neuro Oncol 2014; 16: 589-593.
  • 38. Bot I, Blank CU, Boogerd W, Brandsma D. Neurological immune-related adverse events of ipilimumab. Pract Neurol 2013; 13: 278-280.
  • 39. Izzedine H, Gueutin V, Gharbi C, et al. Kidney injuries related to ipilimumab. Invest New Drugs 2014; 32: 769-773.
  • 40. Chapman PB, Sznol M, Lao C, et al. Safety data from an expanded access program of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO); J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (15 suppl): abstract 9525.
  • 41. Shaw AC, Trinh V, Bassett RL, et al. Retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of ipilimumab in elderly patients with advanced melanoma. American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO); J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (15 suppl): abstract 9540.
  • 42. Jansen Y, Schreuer M, Neyns B. Single-center “real life experience” with pembrolizumab in pretreated advanced melanoma patients. American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO); J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (15 suppl): abstract e21049.
  • 43. Downey SG, Klapper JA, Smith FO, et al. Prognostic factors related to clinical response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by CTL-associated antigen-4 blockade. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 6681-6688.
  • 44. Friedman CF, Navid-Azarbaijani P, Shoushtari AN, et al. Toxicity associated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy in melanoma patients treated at a single-institution under an expanded-access program. American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO); J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (15 suppl): abstract 9519.
  • 45. Johnson DB, Sullivan RJ, Ott PA, et al. Ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2: 234-240.
  • 46. Menzies AM, Johnson DB, Ramanujam S, et al. Anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders or major toxicity with ipilimumab. American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO); J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (15 suppl): abstract 9515.
  • 47. Krammer R, Heinzerling L. Therapy preferences in melanoma treatment–willingness to pay and preference of quality versus length of life of patients, physicians and healthy controls. PLoS One 2014; 9: e111237.
  • 48. Hodi FS, Postow MA, Chesney JA, et al. Overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma who discontinued treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to toxicity in a phase II trial (CheckMate 069). American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO); J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (15 suppl): abstract 9518.
  • 49. Brunot A, Jeudy G, Tas M, et al. Anti-PD-1 tolerance after severe toxicity with ipilimumab therapy in metastatic melanoma patients. American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO); J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (15 suppl): abstract 9551.
  • 50. Weber JS, Gibney G, Sullivan RJ, et al. Sequential administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab with a planned switch in patients with advanced melanoma (CheckMate 064): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 943-955.
  • 51. Bowyer S, Prithviraj P, Lorigan P, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of treatment with the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma after prior anti-PD-1 therapy. Br J Cancer 2016; 114: 1084-1089.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.