Precision medicine in Australia: now is the time to get it right
Authors: Rosie O'Shea, Alan Ma, Robyn Jamieson and Nicole M Rankin
Published online: 17 April 2023
In reply: We thank Nindra and colleagues1 for their commentary on our call to action2 regarding the need for an implementation science research approach to translation of precision medicine into the health care system. Although we acknowledge that access to laboratory genomic testing is vital for precision medicine, there are additional broader systemic issues that also need to be managed in research and planning to ensure scalability, equity of access, and success.
Two examples of health systems level approaches to precision oncology include the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) study3 and the Geisinger Health System.4 These provide some useful lessons and demonstrate some of these broader systemic barriers to precision oncology beyond access to genomic testing alone. GENIE found key barriers, such as patient access to re‐imbursed therapies, clinician readiness for genomics, and technical issues with electronic health record use of molecular tumour information for oncology care. The ProvenCare precision medicine approach taken by Geisinger used evidence‐based care guidelines to devise protocols and implemented these through electronic health record systems across six sites.4 This provided a single model for effective delivery of care and reduced variation in management for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer and showed a 90% uptake of care elements in all sites for patients.4
In addition, understanding the barriers and enablers at the clinician and consumer level is required to enable effective models of care. Research into cancer specialists’ attitudes towards the use of genetic information in precision medicine shows high acceptability, with 63.7% favouring its use in treatment and prognostic information, but with concerns over access and results delivery, cost, knowledge and potential misuse.5 These concerns need to be addressed, along with issues related to the entire patient journey from screening, diagnosis, testing and through to treatment, in order to enable effective models of care.
As we discussed in our article,2 precision medicine implementation research requires a holistic approach recognising the diversity of many factors across the health system including variation in Australian health system structures, variation in health professional practices and patient engagement, as well as access issues for culturally and linguistically diverse groups.
Competing interests
Acknowledgements
Alan Ma is the recipient of a Sydney Health Partners’ Research Translation Fellowship (https://sydneyhealthpartners.org.au/work‐with‐us/research‐translation‐fellowships), which funds part of his clinical time to perform implementation science based research in genomics. The funding source has no designated role in planning, running, design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, reporting or publications.
References
- Nindra U, Pal A, Lee CS. Precision medicine in Australia: now is the time to get it right [letter]. Med J Aust 2023; 218: 330‐331.
- O'Shea R, Ma AS, Jamieson RV, Rankin NM. Precision medicine in Australia: now is the time to get it right. Med J Aust 2022; 217: 559‐563. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2022/217/11/precision‐medicine‐australia‐now‐time‐get‐it‐right
- AACR Project GENIE Consortium. AACR Project GENIE: powering precision medicine through an international consortium. Cancer Discov 2017; 7: 818‐831.
- Katlic MR, Facktor MA, Berry SA, et al. ProvenCare lung cancer: a multi‐institutional improvement collaborative. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 382‐396.
- Vetsch J, Wakefield CE, Techakesari P, et al. Healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward cancer precision medicine: a systematic review. Semin Oncol 2019; 46: 291‐303.
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern