Connect
MJA
MJA

Prostate‐specific antigen testing of asymptomatic men in Australia: an observational study based on electronic general practice data

Guilherme S Franco, Rae‐Anne Hardie, Ling Li, Chisato Imai, Gorkem Sezgin, Julie Li, Adam McLeod, Christopher Pearce and Andrew Georgiou
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.51147
Published online: 12 July 2021

Measuring prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels is widely used for screening for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.1 However, the value of PSA testing for reducing prostate cancer‐specific or all‐cause mortality in asymptomatic men is uncertain.2 The Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia and the Cancer Council of Australia recommend that men aged 50–69 years be offered biennial PSA testing if they make an informed decision to be tested.1

We investigated age‐specific patterns of PSA testing and PSA levels in men aged 40 years or more without symptoms of prostate cancer. We analysed routinely collected data from 180 Victorian general practices, pooled by the data custodian, Outcome Health.3 We included all men who had attended the same practice at least three times during October 2016 – September 2018. We identified tested men and testing frequency from recorded PSA test results. PSA testing prevalence was defined as the number of men tested at least once divided by the total number of men in an age group. We evaluated the relationship between log‐transformed PSA levels and age as a continuous variable in a linear regression model. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners National Research and Evaluation Ethics Committee (17‐008) and the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (5201700872) approved our study.

A total of 142 016 male patients were identified. The proportion who underwent PSA testing at least once (prevalence) or at least twice during the study period increased with age: prevalence peaked with the 65–69 year age group (8132 men tested, 54% of age group), and the proportion of men tested at least twice with the 70–74 year age group (3159 men, 46% of age group) (Box 1). A total of 78 818 PSA test results were recorded during the study period; about one‐third were for men aged 60–69 years (25 496 tests, 32%). The median PSA level increased from 0.7 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 0.5–0.9 ng/mL; 95th percentile, 1.7 ng/mL) for men aged 40–44 years to 1.9 ng/mL (IQR, 0.8–4.5 ng/mL; 95th percentile, 11.7 ng/mL) for men aged 85 years or more (Box 2). The median PSA level increased by 3.2% per year of age (95% confidence interval, 3.1–3.3%).

We found that PSA testing prevalence, the proportion of men tested more than once within 24 months, and median PSA levels each increased with age. For men over 69 years of age, this could lead to further invasive tests and treatments, some of which may be unnecessary or cause harm. The high PSA testing prevalence among older men was similar to previous Australian reports (48% of men aged 70 years or more reported they had PSA tests in the preceding two years4), and the PSA levels matched current age‐specific 95th percentile reference ranges.5 Why patterns of testing are different to those recommended (ie, more frequently than biennial and beyond 69 years of age) cannot be explained by general practice data, but reasons may include patient expectations, fragmentation of care, and the persistence of old guideline recommendations.

We have reported the most comprehensive snapshot of PSA testing in Australia based on electronic general practice data since the release of the current guidelines for PSA testing of asymptomatic men. Our study also showed that such data can be used to establish benchmarks for designing quality improvement activities and to promote evidence‐based decision‐making in general practice.

 

Box 1 – Prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing for 180 Victorian general practices, October 2016 – September 2018, by age group*


* Proportion of male patients in age group who were tested. It is recommended that men aged 50–69 years be tested once every two years. Numbers of patients in each age group are provided in the online Supporting Information.

 

Box 2 – Number of prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) tests and median PSA test result levels, by age group

Age group (years)

Number of tests

PSA level (ng/mL)


Median (IQR)

95th percentile


40–44

2685 (3.4%)

0.7 (0.5–0.9)

1.7

45–49

5894 (7.5%)

0.7 (0.5–1.0)

2.1

50–54

9544 (12.1%)

0.8 (0.5–1.2)

2.6

55–59

12 359 (15.7%)

0.9 (0.6–1.5)

3.7

60–64

12 944 (16.4%)

1.1 (0.6–2.0)

4.7

65–69

12 551 (15.9%)

1.3 (0.7–2.4)

5.5

70–74

10 999 (14.0%)

1.5 (0.8–2.8)

6.4

75–79

6440 (8.2%)

1.6 (0.8–3.3)

8.0

80–84

3327 (4.2%)

1.8 (0.8–3.6)

9.2

≥ 85

2075 (2.6%)

1.9 (0.8–4.5)

11.7

All ages groups

78 818

1.0 (0.6–2.0)

5.4


IQR = interquartile range.

Received 23 December 2020, accepted 17 May 2021

  • Guilherme S Franco1
  • Rae‐Anne Hardie1
  • Ling Li1
  • Chisato Imai1
  • Gorkem Sezgin1
  • Julie Li1
  • Adam McLeod2
  • Christopher Pearce2,3
  • Andrew Georgiou1

  • 1 Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Outcome Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC

Correspondence: andrew.georgiou@mq.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

This study, a collaboration by Macquarie University, Outcome Health, the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, and three Victorian Primary Health Networks (Eastern Melbourne, South Eastern Melbourne, Gippsland), was funded by the Australian Department of Health Quality Use of Pathology Program (grant 4‐2QFVW4M). We thank the practices that contributed data for their commitment to quality improvement.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.