Connect
MJA
MJA

What doctors should know about the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

Anne Marie T Thow, Deborah H Gleeson and Sharon Friel
Med J Aust 2015; 202 (4): 165-166. || doi: 10.5694/mja14.01714

How this new breed of trade agreement could affect public health and access to medicines

Macroeconomic policy decisions can seem far removed from day-to-day medical practice; however, these high-level policy decisions about trade and economic policy have far-reaching consequences and can undermine effective health policy and practice.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • Anne Marie T Thow1
  • Deborah H Gleeson2
  • Sharon Friel3

  • 1 Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 3 Regulatory Institutions Network, Canberra, ACT.


Competing interests:

We all receive funding from the Australian Research Council for research on the TPPA, health and nutrition. Deborah Gleeson has received funding from various national and international non-government organisations to attend speaking engagements related to trade agreements and health, including the TPPA. She has represented the Public Health Association of Australia on matters related to the TPPA. The views expressed in this article are our own and not those of any organisation we are affiliated with.

  • 1. Baldwin R. 21st century regionalism: filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th century trade rules. Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-08. Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2011.
  • 2. Fergusson IF, Cooper WH, Jurenas R, Williams BR. The Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations and issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2013.
  • 3. Gleeson D, Friel S. Emerging threats to public health from regional trade agreements. Lancet 2013; 381: 1507-1509.
  • 4. Gleeson DH, Tienhaara KS, Faunce TA. Challenges to Australia's national health policy from trade and investment agreements. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 354-356. <MJA full text>
  • 5. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Canberra: Australian Government, 2014. http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/tpp/Pages/trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp.aspx (accessed Feb 2015).
  • 6. Rollins A. Fears cloud trade pact despite govt assurances. Australian Medicine 2014; 11 Nov. https://ama.com.au/ausmed/fears-cloud-trade-pact-despite-govt-assurances (accessed Jan 2015).
  • 7. Lopert R, Gleeson D. The high price of “free” trade: U.S. trade agreements and access to medicines. J Law Med Ethics 2013; 41: 199-223.
  • 8. Monasterio E, Gleeson D. The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement: exacerbation of inequality for patients with serious mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2014; 48: 1077-1080.
  • 9. Thow AM, Snowdon W, Labonté R, et al. Will the next generation of preferential trade and investment agreements undermine prevention of noncommunicable diseases? A prospective policy analysis of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement. Health Policy 2015; 119: 88-96.
  • 10. Schewel M. Under the radar, TPP parties wrestle over carveouts on services, SOEs. Inside U.S. Trade 2014; 32 (30).
  • 11. Public Health Association of Australia. Protecting the health of Australians in the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement negotiations [media release]. 17 Feb 2014. http://www.phaa.net.au/documents/140217%20TPPA%20Health%20Impact%20Media%20Release.pdf (accessed Jan 2015).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.