Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?

Tammy C Hoffmann and Christopher B Del Mar
Med J Aust 2014; 201 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja14.01124
Published online: 3 November 2014

In reply: We thank Picone and Levinson for their comments on our article. Levinson raises concerns about situations involving clinical decisions in which evidence is lacking (eg, for patients with complex multiple morbidities), urgent and emotional consultations, and management of patients with cognitive impairment. Certainly, such situations make clinical care encounters more difficult. We acknowledge that shared decision making may not always be possible, and that sometimes the process may need to extend to family or a health care proxy. Nor will it always be desired by every patient or for every health care decision. Nevertheless, it should at least be offered. When there are multiple morbidities, with each needing a decision, one approach is to address each in turn, dealing with interactions between them, as we do for other clinical modalities.

  • Tammy C Hoffmann1,2
  • Christopher B Del Mar1

  • 1 Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD.
  • 2 School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.