Letters
Mental health
Volume 201 - Issue 1

Renal replacement therapy associated with lithium nephrotoxicity in Australia

Author:  William R Adam

Med J Aust 2014; 201 (1): 30. || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00331
Published online: 7 July 2014
The benefits outweigh the kidney risks
Download PDF (100 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

To the Editor: Roxanas and colleagues1 overemphasise the relative risks of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with lithium treatment. Based on the most recent Australian defined daily dose statistics, about 1150 people per million population are taking lithium,2 and the incidence rate for RRT is ≤ 0.78 cases per million population per year.1 Therefore, in Australia, the risk of requiring RRT is < 1/1470, which is considerably lower than that in Sweden (1/187).1,3 The prevalence of patients taking lithium in Australia did not change from 1995 to 2010,2 meaning that the reported increase in patients requiring RRT over that period1 is more likely due to other factors, such as changes in diagnostic categorisations,1-3 or other medications.

Against this low risk of RRT, lithium, when compared with other pharmacological treatments, reduces the risk of suicide, self-harm and manic relapse in patients with major affective disorder.4 The number needed to treat to avoid one suicide is about 50.4 This means that for each person in whom RRT is avoided by cessation of lithium (< 1/1470 treated), up to 30 could be predicted to have committed suicide, and a larger number could be predicted to have a manic relapse or to self-harm.

The challenge is to predict the patients with lithium nephropathy who are likely to require RRT, given the lack of certainty of diagnosis or renal prognosis for such patients.1,3,4 Certainty about a progressive decline in renal function attributable to lithium may take some years in patients with substantial fluctuations in renal function over time,5 making informed consent to cease lithium particularly difficult because of the substantial psychiatric benefits.4

Author

  • William R Adam1
  • 1. Rural Health Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Shepparton, VIC.

Correspondence: wadam@unimelb.edu.au

Competing interests

No relevant disclosures.

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

Mental health Perspective 20 July 2026 Open Access

Reorienting Allied Health Into Community-Based Care for People Experiencing Trauma and Social Disadvantage

Simon Rosenbaum, Grace McKeon, Gulsah Kurt, Oscar Lederman, Kemi Wright, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Jackie E. Curtis, Philip B. Ward, Zachary Steel, Hamish Fibbins, Rachel Morell, Melissa C. Eaton, Andrew Watkins, Ben Harris-Roxas, Brendan Goodger, Eleanor Beck, Megan Teychenne, Joseph Firth, Davy Vancampfort, David Burns, Russell Roberts, Tristan Favaloro, Danielle Weber, Rosanna Barbero, Vasili Maroulis, Melissa Holmes, Stefan Mackenzie, Chiara Mastrogiovanni, Afsana Anwar, Uzma Choudhry, Catherine Sherrington, Jane Currie, Thomas Gadsden, Scott Teasdale

View more