A mobile unit allows surgical trainees to use state-of-the-art simulation equipment in urban and rural locations
Simulation-based training has gained importance in surgical training worldwide. It allows trainees to learn and consolidate skills without risking patient safety.1,2 Evidence for the educational value of surgical simulation is accumulating rapidly, and several studies have shown that simulator-acquired skills can be successfully transferred to the operating room.3-5 Nonetheless, simulation is still not widely available to Australian surgical trainees. A recent survey showed that 43% of supervisors and 63% of surgical trainee respondents reported having no simulation equipment at their workplace.6
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Gaba D. The future vision of simulation in health care. Simul Healthc 2007; 2: 126-135.
- 2. Windsor JA. Role of simulation in surgical education and training. ANZ J Surg 2009; 79: 127-132.
- 3. Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, et al. A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 166-179.
- 4. Dawe S, Windsor JA, Cregan P, et al. Surgical simulation for training: skills transfer to the operating room (update). Adelaide, South Australia: ASERNIP-S. November 2012.
- 5. Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra S, Cook D. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 586-598.
- 6. Pena G, Altree M, Field J, et al. Demand for surgical simulated learning. Supervisor’s and trainee’s views: do they align? ANZ J Surg 2013; 83: 700-701.
- 7. Shaikh F, Hseino H, Hill A, et al. Mobile surgical skills education unit: a new concept in surgical training. Simul Healthc 2011; 6: 226-230.
- 8. Xafis V, Babidge W, Field J, et al. The efficacy of laparoscopic skills training in a Mobile Simulation Unit compared with a fixed site: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2606-2612.
Acknowledgement: This project was made possible by funding from the Australian Government Department of Health.
No relevant disclosures.