Volume 200 - Issue 10

Liaise with pathologists to refine understanding of the prostate-specific antigen test

Author:  Kenneth A Sikaris

Med J Aust 2014; 200 (10): 578. || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00048
Published online: 2 June 2014
Age-related medians significantly predict prostate cancer outcomes

In reply: It is interesting that in the debate on prostate cancer screening, positions are not as far apart as a “debate” implies. I agree with Del Mar and colleagues that all the existing trials have “serious potential methodological flaws” and therefore cannot be taken as evidence that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is effective — nor that it is ineffective. Both sides of the “debate” are consistent with the recent National Health and Medical Research Council conclusion that PSA testing may help some men and may not help others.

Numerous studies have shown that age-related medians significantly predict prostate cancer outcomes,1-5 and therefore the experts advising the Medicare Benefits Schedule have supported follow-up of PSA levels above the median. While I am also hopeful that new markers for detection will be found, in the interim, in the realm of pathology testing, no better approach than PSA-based testing is available. While magnetic resonance imaging may offer significant advantages (and at a cost), I would leave this potential for my medical imaging and urology colleagues to sort out, as it is outside my area of expertise.


Author


Competing interests


References