Doctors, death certificates and reporting to coroners — room for improvement

Stephen M Cordner
Med J Aust 2013; 199 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10683
Published online: 16 September 2013

Uncertainty about which deaths are reportable is complicated by jurisdictional differences

In this issue of the Journal, Neate and colleagues review 320 deaths due to external causes in Victoria in the 2010–11 financial year that should have been reported to the coroner by doctors, but were not.1 Based on the causes of death reported on the death certificates, the Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages referred the cases to the coroner for investigation. These deaths represent 6.6% of the total 4857 deaths reported to the coroner that year.2 Of these unreported deaths, 307 (96%) were the result of injuries from falls, 80% of the deceased were aged 80 years or older, and 68% of them were in hospital at the time of death. In 309 cases (97%), the cause of death was changed based on forensic pathology advice. One case went to an inquest. The fact that the external cause of the death — overwhelmingly fracture of the hip or pelvis, or head injury — was evident on the death certificate would seem to indicate a misunderstanding about the reportability of the deaths, rather than a conscious attempt to subvert the system.

  • 1 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Melbourne, VIC.


Competing interests:

As Director of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, I am part of the overall coronial system in Victoria.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.