Can professionalism be taught?

Ian M Symonds and Nicholas J Talley
Med J Aust 2013; 199 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10656
Published online: 16 September 2013

Yes, but a more strategic approach should replace didactic methods

Public confidence in professional standards in medicine has not only been undermined by high-profile scandals such as those in Alder Hey, Bristol and Bundaberg, but also by the failure of the profession to identify and discipline its errant members. Doctors who are subject to disciplinary action are three times as likely as their peers (95% CI, 1.9–4.8) to have been identified as having behavioural problems as medical students.1 Medical program developers have increasingly tried to include teaching on “professionalism” in undergraduate curricula,2 and yet, as Birden and Usherwood report in this issue of the Journal, students have a low regard for the way in which this is done.3

  • 1 Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
  • 2 Joint Medical Program, University of Newcastle and University of New England, NSW.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2673-2682.
  • 2. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010; 376: 1923-1958.
  • 3. Birden HH, Usherwood T. “They liked it if you said you cried”: how medical students perceive the teaching of professionalism. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 406-409.
  • 4. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002; 287: 226-235.
  • 5. Medical Professionalism Project. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians’ charter. Lancet 2002; 359: 520-522.
  • 6. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Competency definitions and recommended practice performance tools. ACMGE, 2007. (accessed Jun 2013).
  • 7. Rezler AG. Attitude changes during medical school: a review of the literature. J Med Educ 1974; 49: 1023-1030.
  • 8. Cribb A, Bignold S. Towards the reflexive medical school: the hidden curriculum and medical education research. Stud High Educ 1999; 24: 195-209.
  • 9. Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Role modelling — making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ 2008; 336: 718-721.
  • 10. Stephenson A, Higgs R, Sugarman J. Teaching professional development in medical schools. Lancet 2001; 357: 867-870.
  • 11. Bore M, Munro D, Kerridge I, Powis D. Selection of medical students according to their moral orientation. Med Educ 2005; 39: 266-275.
  • 12. Dowell J, Lumsden MA, Powis D, et al. Predictive validity of the personal qualities assessment for selection of medical students in Scotland. Med Teach 2011; 33: e485-e488. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.599448.
  • 13. Swick MS, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb ME. Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education. JAMA 1999; 282: 830-883.
  • 14. Passi V, Doug M, Peile E, et al. Developing medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic review. Int J Med Educ 2010; 1: 19-29.
  • 15. Nair B, Hensley M, Parvathy M, et al. A systematic approach to workplace-based assessment for international medical graduates. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 399-402. <MJA full text>
  • 16. Owen C, Mathews P, Phillips C, et al. Intern culture, internal resistance: uptake of peer review in two Australian hospital internship programs. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35: 430-435.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.