MJA
MJA

Medical graduates becoming rural doctors: rural background versus extended rural placement

Med J Aust 2013; 199 (11): 779-782. || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10036

Summary

Objectives: To determine whether recruitment of rural students and uptake of extended rural placements are associated with students’ expressed intentions to undertake rural internships and students’ acceptance of rural internships after finishing medical school, and to compare any associations.

Design, setting and participants: Longitudinal study of three successive cohorts (commencing 2005, 2006, 2007) of medical students in the Sydney Medical Program (SMP), University of Sydney, New South Wales, using responses to self-administered questionnaires upon entry to and exit from the Sydney Medical School and data recorded in rolls.

Main outcome measures: Students’ expressed intentions to undertake rural internships, and their acceptance of rural internships after finishing medical school.

Results: Data from 448 students were included. The proportion of students preferring a rural career dropped from 20.7% (79/382) to 12.5% (54/433) between entry into and exit from the SMP. A total of 98 students took extended rural placements. Ultimately, 8.1% (35/434) accepted a rural internship, although 14.5% (60/415) had indicated a first preference for a rural post. Students who had undertaken an extended rural placement were more than three times as likely as those with rural backgrounds to express a first preference for a rural internship (23.9% v 7.7%; χ2 = 7.04; P = 0.008) and more than twice as likely to accept a rural internship (21.3% v 9.9%; χ2 = 3.85; P = 0.05).

Conclusion: For the three cohorts studied, rural clinical training through extended placements in rural clinical schools had a stronger association than rural background with a preference for, and acceptance of, rural internship.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • Tyler R Clark1
  • Saul B Freedman1
  • Amanda J Croft2
  • Hazel E Dalton2
  • Georgina M Luscombe2
  • Anthony M Brown2
  • David J Tiller2
  • Michael S Frommer1

  • 1 Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 School of Rural Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Correspondence: tyler.clark@sydney.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

The University of Sydney School of Rural Health, where extended rural placements take place, is funded in part by the Commonwealth’s Rural Clinical Training and Support program.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Henry JA, Edwards BJ, Crotty B. Why do medical graduates choose rural careers? Rural Remote Health 2009; 9: 1083.
  • 2. Carter RG. The relation between personal characteristics of physicians and practice location in Manitoba. CMAJ 1987; 136: 366-368.
  • 3. Rolfe IE, Pearson SA, O’Connell DL, Dickinson JA. Finding solutions to the rural doctor shortage: the roles of selection versus undergraduate medical education at Newcastle. Aust N Z J Med 1995; 25: 512-517.
  • 4. McGrail MR, Humphreys JS, Joyce CM. Nature of association between rural background and practice location: a comparison of general practitioners and specialists. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 63.
  • 5. Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand. Medical schools outcomes database. www.medicaldeans.org.au/medical-s chools-outcomes-database (accessed Dec 2012).
  • 6. Humphreys JS, Prideaux D, Beilby JJ, Glasgow NJ. From medical school to medical practice: a national tracking system to underpin planning for a sustainable medical workforce in Australasia. Med J Aust 2009; 191: 244-245. <MJA full text>
  • 7. Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS. Statistical methods in medical research. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2002.
  • 8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications. Canberra: AIHW, 2004. (AIHW Cat. No. PHE 53; Rural Health Series No. 4.) http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442467589 (accessed Oct 2013).
  • 9. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC), July 2011. Canberra: ABS, 2009. (ABS Cat. No. 1216.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1216.0 (accessed Nov 2012).
  • 10. Gerber JP, Landau LI. Driving change in rural workforce planning: the medical schools outcomes database. Aust J Prim Health 2010; 16: 36-39.
  • 11. Krahe LM, McColl AR, Pallant JF, et al. A multi-university study of which factors medical students consider when deciding to attend a rural clinical school in Australia. Rural Remote Health 2010; 10: 1477.
  • 12. Stagg P, Greenhill J, Worley PS. A new model to understand the career choice and practice location decisions of medical graduates. Rural Remote Health 2009; 9: 1245.
  • 13. Wilkinson D, Laven G, Pratt N, Beilby J. Impact of undergraduate and postgraduate rural training, and medical school entry criteria on rural practice among Australian general practitioners: national study of 2414 doctors. Med Educ 2003; 37: 809-814.
  • 14. Chan BT, Degani N, Crichton T, et al. Factors influencing family physicians to enter rural practice: does rural or urban background make a difference? Can Fam Physician 2005; 51: 1246-1247.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article