Open disclosure: ethical, professional and legal obligations, and the way forward for regulation

Angus J F Finlay, Cameron L Stewart and Malcolm Parker
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (8): 445-448. || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10734
  • Angus J F Finlay1
  • Cameron L Stewart2
  • Malcolm Parker1

  • 1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 2 Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Open disclosure standard: a national standard for open communication in public and private hospitals, following an adverse event in health care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2003. (accessed Apr 2013).
  • 2. Studdert DM, Piper D, Iedema R. Legal aspects of open disclosure II: attitudes of health professionals - findings from a national survey. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 351-355. <MJA full text>
  • 3. Madden B, Cockburn T. Duty to disclose medical error in Australia. Aust Health Law Bull 2005; 14: 13-20.
  • 4. Madden B, Cockburn T. Bundaberg and beyond: duty to disclose adverse events to patients. J Law Med 2007; 14: 501-527.
  • 5. Iedema RA, Mallock NA, Sorensen RJ, et al. The National Open Disclosure Pilot: evaluation of a policy implementation initiative. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 397-400. <MJA full text>
  • 6. Medical Board of Australia. Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Medical Council Limited, 2010. (accessed Mar 2013).
  • 7. Clinical Excellence Commission and NSW Department of Health. Clinical incident management in the NSW public health system: looking, learning, acting. 2011. (accessed Mar 2013).
  • 8. Health Quality and Complaints Commission. Submission to Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: review of the ACSQHC open disclosure standard. 2012. (accessed Dec 2012).
  • 9. Stewart C, Kerridge I, Parker M. The Australian medico-legal handbook. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2008: 46-49.
  • 10. Wighton v Arnot [2005] NSWSC 637.
  • 11. Naylor v Preston Area Health Authority [1987] 2 All ER 353.
  • 12. Solomon RC. Ethical issues in medical malpractice. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2006; 24: 733-747.
  • 13. Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, et al. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA 2003; 289: 1001-1007.
  • 14. Lamb RM, Studdert DM, Bohmer RM, et al. Hospital disclosure practices: results of a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; 22: 73-83.
  • 15. Studdert DM, Richardson MW. Legal aspects of open disclosure: a review of Australian law. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 273-276. <MJA full text>
  • 16. Quinn RE, Eichler MC. The 3Rs program: the Colorado experience. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51: 709-718.
  • 17. Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, et al. Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 213-221.
  • 18. Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2713-2719.
  • 19. Iedema R, Sorensen R, Piper D. Open disclosure: a review of the literature. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and University of Technology, Sydney, 2008.
  • 20. Australian Government Treasury Law of Negligence Review Panel. Review of the law of negligence: final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2002. (accessed Mar 2013).
  • 21. Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld), s. 72.
  • 22. Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s. 68-69.
  • 23. Civil Liability Act 2003 (Tas), s. 7.
  • 24. Vines P. Apologising to avoid liability: cynical civility or practical morality. Sydney L Rev 2005; 27: 483-505. (accessed Mar 2013).
  • 25. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Open disclosure standard. Review report. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2012. (accessed Dec 2012).
  • 26. Brown D. Open disclosure: morally right but is it legally safe? Presented at Medico-Legal Society of NSW Scientific Meeting, March 2008. (accessed Feb 2012).
  • 27. Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins [2003] HCA 51; 215 CLR 317; 201 ALR 139.
  • 28. UK Department of Health Patient Safety Team. implementing a “duty of candour” a new contractual requirement on providers. Proposals for consultation. 2011. (accessed Jan 2012).
  • 29. UK Department of Health Patient Safety Team. implementing a “duty of candour” a new contractual requirement on providers. Analysis of consultation responses. 2012. (accessed Mar 2013).
  • 30. Limb M. Peers’ rejection of statutory duty of candour is a missed opportunity, say campaigners. BMJ 2012; 344: e1116.
  • 31. Hospital and Health Boards Regulation 2012 (Qld), s. 12.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.