Open disclosure (OD) after adverse health care events is the subject of a national standard that has been implemented in state health policy documents, and is included in the Medical Board of Australia’s code of conduct for doctors.
Nevertheless, doctors have been slow to embrace the practice of OD.
There is a strong ethical case for implementing OD in the primary interests of patients, and additionally from a medicolegal risk management point of view.
There are no statutory requirements in relation to OD, but common law judgments have imposed a duty of OD in tort and contract.
There are a number of barriers to the better uptake and implementation of OD, including perceptions of legal risk, lack of education and training, reluctance to admit error, uncertainty concerning what and how much to disclose, and the variations in state and territory “apology laws”.
The implementation of OD could be improved by making apology laws consistent across jurisdictions, including providing “blanket” cover for admissions of fault; by preventing insurers voiding contracts when apologies are made, either through self-regulation or legislation; and by inserting OD obligations into different structures within the health system.
- 1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Open disclosure standard: a national standard for open communication in public and private hospitals, following an adverse event in health care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2003. http://www.health.qld.gov.au/psq/od/docs/odst.pdf (accessed Apr 2013).
- 2. Studdert DM, Piper D, Iedema R. Legal aspects of open disclosure II: attitudes of health professionals - findings from a national survey. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 351-355. <MJA full text>
- 3. Madden B, Cockburn T. Duty to disclose medical error in Australia. Aust Health Law Bull 2005; 14: 13-20.
- 4. Madden B, Cockburn T. Bundaberg and beyond: duty to disclose adverse events to patients. J Law Med 2007; 14: 501-527.
- 5. Iedema RA, Mallock NA, Sorensen RJ, et al. The National Open Disclosure Pilot: evaluation of a policy implementation initiative. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 397-400. <MJA full text>
- 6. Medical Board of Australia. Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Medical Council Limited, 2010. http://www.amc.org.au/index.php/about/good-medical-practice (accessed Mar 2013).
- 7. Clinical Excellence Commission and NSW Department of Health. Clinical incident management in the NSW public health system: looking, learning, acting. 2011. http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__documents/publications/hss11-1012_cec-cimreport_j2j-2010_web.pdf (accessed Mar 2013).
- 8. Health Quality and Complaints Commission. Submission to Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: review of the ACSQHC open disclosure standard. 2012. http://www.hqcc.qld.gov.au/Resources/Documents/Submission-ACSQHC-open-disclosure-standard.pdf (accessed Dec 2012).
- 9. Stewart C, Kerridge I, Parker M. The Australian medico-legal handbook. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2008: 46-49.
- 10. Wighton v Arnot  NSWSC 637.
- 11. Naylor v Preston Area Health Authority  2 All ER 353.
- 12. Solomon RC. Ethical issues in medical malpractice. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2006; 24: 733-747.
- 13. Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, et al. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA 2003; 289: 1001-1007.
- 14. Lamb RM, Studdert DM, Bohmer RM, et al. Hospital disclosure practices: results of a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; 22: 73-83.
- 15. Studdert DM, Richardson MW. Legal aspects of open disclosure: a review of Australian law. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 273-276. <MJA full text>
- 16. Quinn RE, Eichler MC. The 3Rs program: the Colorado experience. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51: 709-718.
- 17. Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, et al. Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 213-221.
- 18. Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2713-2719.
- 19. Iedema R, Sorensen R, Piper D. Open disclosure: a review of the literature. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and University of Technology, Sydney, 2008.
- 20. Australian Government Treasury Law of Negligence Review Panel. Review of the law of negligence: final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2002. http://revofneg.treasury.gov.au/content/review2.asp (accessed Mar 2013).
- 21. Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld), s. 72.
- 22. Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s. 68-69.
- 23. Civil Liability Act 2003 (Tas), s. 7.
- 24. Vines P. Apologising to avoid liability: cynical civility or practical morality. Sydney L Rev 2005; 27: 483-505. http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/previous.shtml (accessed Mar 2013).
- 25. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Open disclosure standard. Review report. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2012. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/63652-Open-Disclosure-Standard-Review-Report-Final-Jun-2012.pdf (accessed Dec 2012).
- 26. Brown D. Open disclosure: morally right but is it legally safe? Presented at Medico-Legal Society of NSW Scientific Meeting, March 2008. http://www.medicolegal.org.au/resources/publications-archive/p2008/open-disclosure-morally-right-but-is-it-legally-safe/brown/ (accessed Feb 2012).
- 27. Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins  HCA 51; 215 CLR 317; 201 ALR 139.
- 28. UK Department of Health Patient Safety Team. implementing a “duty of candour” a new contractual requirement on providers. Proposals for consultation. 2011. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_130400 (accessed Jan 2012).
- 29. UK Department of Health Patient Safety Team. implementing a “duty of candour” a new contractual requirement on providers. Analysis of consultation responses. 2012. https://www.wp.dh.gov.uk/publications/files/2012/11/summary-of-consultation-responses-duty-of-candour.pdf (accessed Mar 2013).
- 30. Limb M. Peers’ rejection of statutory duty of candour is a missed opportunity, say campaigners. BMJ 2012; 344: e1116.
- 31. Hospital and Health Boards Regulation 2012 (Qld), s. 12.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.