Our guidelines need to do more for the health of the planet as well as the population
A draft revision of Australia’s dietary guidelines was released by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) for public comment in December 2011.1 Although comprehensive with respect to nutrition, there is minimal reference in the guidelines to the environmental impact of the food supply and what food choices consumers can make to minimise this impact. Continuing to consume food that has a large ecological footprint will threaten our future food supply. As ensuring food security and minimising the environmental impact of food are intrinsically linked, it is time that all involved in making recommendations about food consumption start taking this food and environmental interconnection into account. Recently, the NHMRC released a draft appendix to the revised dietary guidelines, Australian dietary guidelines through an environmental lens.2 Although this draft appendix acknowledges the critical need to consider the environmental impact of food “from paddock to plate”, the recommendations made are limited, fairly generic and need to be strengthened.
- 1. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian dietary guidelines incorporating the Australian guide to healthy eating: providing the scientific evidence for healthier Australian diets. Draft for public consultation. Canberra: NHMRC, 2011. http://consultations.nhmrc.gov.au/files/consultations/n55draftaustraliandietaryguidelinesconsultation111212.pdf (accessed Mar 2012).
- 2. National Health and Medical Research Council. Public consultation draft on an Appendix to the Australian dietary guidelines. Australian dietary guidelines through an environmental lens. Canberra: NHMRC, 2012. http://consultations.nhmrc.gov.au/public_consultations/dietary-appendix (accessed Oct 2012).
- 3. National Health and Medical Research Council. Dietary guidelines for Australian adults. Canberra: NHMRC, 2003. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/n33.pdf (accessed Jul 2012).
- 4. Health Council of the Netherlands. Guidelines for a healthy diet: the ecological perspective. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, 2011. (Publication no. 2011/08E.) http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/201108E.pdf (accessed Mar 2012).
- 5. Brunner EJ, Jones PJS, Friel S, Bartley M. Fish, human health and marine ecosystem health: policies in collision. Int J Epidemiol 2009; 38: 93-100.
- 7. Ruello NV. A study of the composition, value and utilisation of imported seafood in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, 2011. http://www.apfa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2010-222-DLD.pdf (accessed Mar 2012).
- 8. The Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council. Australia and food security in a changing world. Can we feed ourselves and help feed the world in the future? Report of the PMSEIC Expert Working Group. Canberra: PMSEIC, 2010. http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/FoodSecurity_web.pdf (accessed Mar 2012).
- 9. Jungbluth N. Comparison of the environmental impact of tap water vs bottled mineral water. Uster, Switzerland: Swiss Gas and Water Association, 2006. http://aquadoc.typepad.com/waterwired/files/bottled_water_impact_lca.pdf (accessed Mar 2012).
- 10. Friel S, Dangour AD, Garnett T, et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture. Lancet 2009; 374: 2016-2025.
- 11. Heat takes toll of Queensland wheat crop. ABC News 2009; 25 Aug. http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/200908/s2665966.htm (accessed Dec 2012).
- 12. CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. State of the climate 2012. Canberra: CSIRO and BOM, 2012. http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/ho/stateClimate2012.pdf (accessed Mar 2012).
- 13. Lea E, Worsley A. Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours. Appetite 2008; 50: 207-214.
- 6. Srinivasan UT, Watson R, Sumaila UR. Global fisheries losses at the exclusive economic zone level, 1950 to present. Marine Policy 2012; 36: 544-549.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.