MJA
MJA InSight
MJA Careers
Clinical focus

The role of HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in Australia

Michael C d’Emden, Jonathan E Shaw, Peter G Colman, Stephen Colagiuri, Stephen M Twigg, Graham R D Jones, Ian Goodall, Hans G Schneider and N Wah Cheung
Med J Aust 2012; 197 (4): 220-221.
doi:
10.5694/mja12.10988
Summary
  • For many years, the diagnosis of diabetes has been made through the laboratory-based measurement of fasting or random blood glucose levels, or using the oral glucose tolerance test.

  • A glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) is now also acceptable for diagnosing diabetes.

  • Caution is needed in interpreting HbA1c test results in the presence of conditions affecting red blood cells or their survival time, such as haemoglobinopathies or anaemia.

A PDF of the abridged version of this article from the print issue can be downloaded here.

Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem for Australia. It is associated with the development of a variety of complications that have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Study found an overall diabetes prevalence of 7.4% in a national sample of people aged 25 years or older, with 50% of cases being previously undiagnosed.1 The long-term complications of type 1 and type 2 diabetes include the microvascular complications of retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy, but the major health problem in type 2 diabetes is the increased risk of macrovascular complications, such as coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease.

It is important to establish the diagnosis of diabetes early in its development, as effective management of the disease has been shown in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) to significantly reduce the risk of developing complications.2 Furthermore, long-term follow-up of participants during the observational phase of the UKPDS demonstrated that more effective glycaemic control from the time of diagnosis in people with type 2 diabetes conferred a long-term legacy benefit that persisted even though glycaemic control may deteriorate over time.3 This observation implies that strategies that facilitate early detection of diabetes should result in improved outcomes, with major long-term health and cost benefits for Australia.

Traditionally, we have relied on measurement of blood glucose parameters to make the diagnosis of diabetes.4,5 The cut-offs used to establish the diagnosis defined elevated blood glucose levels on the basis of an increased risk of diabetes-related complications. Although there is a clear and highly significant relationship between blood glucose levels and cardiovascular disease, there is no threshold level at which cardiovascular disease will occur.6 However, microvascular complications, and in particular retinopathy, show a much clearer threshold of glycaemia above which they occur and where glucose-lowering therapy is clearly effective in preventing them.2 Thus, the diagnosis of diabetes has been based on blood glucose threshold levels associated with the presence of retinopathy.5

However, measuring blood glucose levels is associated with methodological, procedural and practical problems. Day-to-day variation of blood glucose levels is considerable, the concentration ex vivo falls quickly even when the blood sample is collected in a fluoride-oxalate tube, and interlaboratory levels can vary by at least 14% in a third of cases.7,8 The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) requires proper pretest preparation, including an appropriate diet for 3 days before the test and a satisfactory period of overnight fasting. The OGTT is also time-consuming, taking at least 2 hours. The glucose load is poorly tolerated by a significant number of people, with nausea, vomiting, delayed gastric emptying and issues of venous access all potentially contributing to an invalid test result. The test often needs to be repeated and has poor patient compliance. A recent study from South Australia showed that only 27% of patients identified on admission to hospital as potentially having diabetes presented for a diagnostic OGTT despite consenting to undertake the test.9

The use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement as an alternative diagnostic test overcomes many of these concerns. The HbA1c test is attractive as it measures chronic glycaemia, rather than instantaneous blood glucose levels. HbA1c has been used as an objective marker of average glycaemic control for many years, has an accepted place in the monitoring of patients with diabetes, and is relied on for significant management decisions, such as initiation of insulin therapy. The strength of its relationship with diabetes-related complications was demonstrated in an analysis of the combined data from eight studies conducted between 1988 and 2004, which reported that HbA1c levels were at least as strongly related to the presence of diabetic retinopathy as were blood glucose levels.10 It is also strongly associated with macrovascular outcomes and mortality.11-13 Practically, HbA1c measurement provides significant advantages over blood glucose measurement for diagnosis of diabetes. It can be performed at any time of the day, does not require special pretest preparation such as a diet or fasting, and is stable when collected in the appropriate specimen tube.

HbA1c has recently been endorsed as a diagnostic test for diabetes by the World Health Organization, the International Diabetes Federation and the American Diabetes Association.14,15 The Australian Diabetes Society established an expert committee in 2011, including invited representatives of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) and the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB), to review the available evidence and provide this position statement concerning the role of HbA1c in the diagnostic pathway. Additionally, the committee sought to ensure that its recommendations otherwise concur with recently published National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines for the detection and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.16 A summary of the committee’s recommendations is shown in the Box.

The committee concluded that HbA1c can have an important place in the diagnostic pathway and can be used to establish the diagnosis of diabetes. An HbA1c level ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) is recommended as the cut-off point for diagnosing diabetes. In an asymptomatic patient with a positive test result, the test should be repeated to confirm the diagnosis. The use of HbA1c measurement will simplify the diagnostic process and may lead to earlier diagnosis of more patients with diabetes. However, HbA1c should not be used as a general screening test for diabetes; initial screening should be on the basis of the Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool (AUSDRISK) score, as recommended in the NHMRC guidelines.16 Furthermore, it must be noted that the HbA1c assay is not currently funded by Medicare as a diagnostic or screening test for diabetes, although funding for this purpose is being sought. Medicare payments for HbA1c testing currently require evidence that the patient has diabetes, such as a statement to this effect on the request form.

There are some important caveats. If used as a diagnostic test, the HbA1c assay needs to be reliable and consistent across Australia. There have been problems in the past with HbA1c test results varying considerably between laboratories. In the United States, the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) has progressively driven improvements in assays,18 resulting in better-quality results around the world. The variability of HbA1c values within Australia is now acceptably low. In a recent Australian study, whole blood samples were sent to more than 200 laboratories, and more than 90% of HbA1c results fell within 6% of the median.19 Although the variation between laboratories remains even lower for blood glucose assays, when the pretest issues (eg, day-to-day variation in glucose levels, the fall in plasma glucose levels after the sample has been taken) are also considered, the HbA1c test performs at least as well as glucose testing. Further improvements in standardisation of HbA1c measurements should be achieved following the development of a national whole blood external quality control program by the RCPA Quality Assurance Programs and the AACB.

When applying HbA1c testing for the diagnosis of diabetes, some medical conditions may affect the test and cause falsely high or low readings. The test’s accuracy is affected principally by conditions that affect red blood cell survival time or non-enzymatic glycation of haemoglobin. A reduced red blood cell survival time will lower the HbA1c level and may lead to a false negative result. Red blood cell survival time is reduced in any haemolytic anaemia, and it can also be reduced in chronic renal failure, severe liver disease and anaemia of chronic disease. Vitamin B12 and folic acid deficiencies may shorten red blood cell survival time. A common clinical situation that shortens red blood cell survival time occurs when patients undergo regular phlebotomy for medical indications (eg, haemochromatosis) or because they are regular blood donors. Iron deficiency may also have an impact on red blood cell survival and the HbA1c level. The congenital variants of the haemoglobin molecule (haemoglobinopathies), which may be relatively common in certain ethnic communities (eg, African, Mediterranean) in Australia, affect glycation to a variable amount, principally due to interference with the laboratory measurement of HbA1c level. Many newer laboratory methods are reducing this problem. The NGSP provides a summary of the effect of common haemoglobinopathies on measurement of HbA1c levels using various methods (http://www.ngsp.org/interf.asp). However, any inexplicably high or low HbA1c test result or discrepancy between glucose and HbA1c levels should alert the medical practitioner to a potential problem.

Simplistically, HbA1c may not be the appropriate test to confirm the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with any significant chronic medical disease, any anaemia or any abnormality of red blood cell structure.7,8,20 If any of these conditions exist, the diagnosis should be based on measures of blood glucose levels using existing criteria (fasting or random glucose level, and OGTT). These issues will be addressed in another publication from the Australian Diabetes Society, as will the place of HbA1c in the clinical pathways for diagnosing diabetes.

Recommendations regarding the use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) testing for the diagnosis of diabetes*

  • Measurement of HbA1c level can be used as a diagnostic test for diabetes if analysis is performed in a facility producing acceptable performance in external quality assurance, assays are standardised to criteria aligned to international reference values, and if no conditions which preclude its accuracy are present. It is important to note that HbA1c testing is not currently funded by Medicare for the purpose of diagnosis of diabetes.

  • An HbA1c level of ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) is recommended as the cut-off point for diagnosing diabetes.

  • An HbA1c level of < 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) does not negate a diagnosis of diabetes based on elevated glucose parameters. The existing criteria based on fasting and random glucose levels, and on the oral glucose tolerance test, remain valid, and are the diagnostic tests of choice for gestational diabetes, type 1 diabetes and in the presence of conditions that interfere with HbA1c measurement.

* Level of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system: moderate.17

Provenance: 
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Michael C d’Emden, MD, PhD, FRACP, Director of Endocrinology and Diabetes,1 and Chair of HbA1c Committee2
Jonathan E Shaw, MD, FRACP, FRCP, Endocrinologist3
Peter G Colman, MB BS, FRACP, MD, Director of Diabetes and Endocrinology4
Stephen Colagiuri, MB BS, FRACP, Professor of Metabolic Health5
Stephen M Twigg, MB BS, PhD, FRACP, Professor of Medicine6
Graham R D Jones, MB BS, DPhil, FRCPA, Chemical Pathologist,7 and RCPA Representative, HbA1c Committee8
Ian Goodall, FAACB, FAIMS, FFSC(RCPA), Retired Medical Scientist,9 and AACB Representative, HbA1c Committee10
Hans G Schneider, MD, FRCPA, FRACP, Director of Alfred Pathology Service11
N Wah Cheung, MB BS, PhD, FRACP, Director of Diabetes and Endocrinology12
1 Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD.
2 Australian Diabetes Society, Sydney, NSW.
3 Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC.
4 Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
5 Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
6 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
7 St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
8 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, Sydney, NSW.
9 Melbourne, VIC.
10 Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists, Sydney, NSW.
11 Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC.
12 Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Competing interests: 
No relevant disclosures.
Reference Text: 
Dunstan DW, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, et al. The rising prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 829-834.
Reference Order: 
1
PubMed ID: 
11978676
Reference Text: 
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.
Reference Order: 
2
PubMed ID: 
9742976
Reference Text: 
Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-Year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1577-1589.
Reference Order: 
3
PubMed ID: 
18784090
Reference Text: 
Colman PG, Thomas DW, Zimmet PZ, et al. New classification and criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Position statement from the Australian Diabetes Society, New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes, Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists. Med J Aust 1999; 170: 375-378.
Reference Order: 
4
PubMed ID: 
10327951
Reference Text: 
World Health Organization. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
Reference Order: 
5
Reference Text: 
Balkau B, Bertrais S, Ducimetiere P, Eschwege E. Is there a glycemic threshold for mortality risk. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 696-699.
Reference Order: 
6
PubMed ID: 
10332668
Reference Text: 
Kirkman MS, Kendall DM. Hemoglobin A1c to diagnose diabetes: why the controversy over adding a new tool? Clin Chem 2011; 57: 255-257.
Reference Order: 
7
PubMed ID: 
20844061
Reference Text: 
Sacks DB. A1c versus glucose testing: a comparison. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 518-523.
Reference Order: 
8
PubMed ID: 
21270207
Reference Text: 
Valentine NA, Alhawassi TM, Roberts GW, et al. Detecting undiagnosed diabetes using glycated haemoglobin: an automated screening test in hospitalised patients. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 160-164.
Reference Order: 
9
Reference Text: 
Colagiuri S, Lee CM, Wong TY, et al. Glycemic thresholds for diabetes-specific retinopathy: implications for diagnostic criteria for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 145-150.
Reference Order: 
10
PubMed ID: 
20978099
Reference Text: 
Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 405-412.
Reference Order: 
11
PubMed ID: 
10938048
Reference Text: 
Khaw KT, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Association of hemoglobin A1c with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: the European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 413-420.
Reference Order: 
12
PubMed ID: 
15381514
Reference Text: 
Selvin E, Steffes MW, Zhu H, et al. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 800-811.
Reference Order: 
13
PubMed ID: 
20200384
Reference Text: 
Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Report of a World Health Organization Consultation. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 93: 299-309.
Reference Order: 
14
Reference Text: 
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes — 2011. Diabetes Care 2011; 34 Suppl 1: S11-S61.
Reference Order: 
15
PubMed ID: 
21193625
Reference Text: 
Colagiuri S, Davies D, Girgis S, Colagiuri R. National evidence based guideline for case detection and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Canberra: Diabetes Australia and National Health and Medical Research Council, 2009.
Reference Order: 
16
Reference Text: 
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-926.
Reference Order: 
17
PubMed ID: 
18436948
Reference Text: 
Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Sacks DB; National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) Steering Committee. Status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care. Clin Chem 2011; 57: 205-214.
Reference Order: 
18
PubMed ID: 
21148304
Reference Text: 
RCPA Chemical Pathology Programs. Program information circular: glycohaemoglobin program, whole blood samples, 22/06/09. http://www.rcpaqap.com.au/chempath/documents/uploadedfiles/455_Whole%20Blood%20Samples%20270809.pdf (accessed Jun 2012).
Reference Order: 
19
Reference Text: 
Gallagher EJ, Le Roith D, Bloomgarden ZT. Review of hemoglobin A1c in the management of diabetes. J Diabetes 2009; 1: 9-17.
Reference Order: 
20
PubMed ID: 
20923515