Objective: To use patient-level data, clinical information and linked Medicare records to assess the distribution of benefits (rebates) across income groups, including benefits relating to chronic conditions such as the Chronic Disease Dental Scheme (CDDS).
Design, setting and participants: Nationally representative, cluster-stratified survey (the Australian Hypertension and Absolute Risk Study) involving 322 general practitioners who each collected clinical data on 15–20 patients aged ≥ 55 years who presented between 1 April 2008 and 30 June 2008 and who consented to have their information linked with Medicare administrative records over 12 months.
Results: There were 2862 patients in the study. After controlling for need, the concentration index for overall funding was slightly progressive (pro-poor) at − 0.008 (95% CI, − 0.009 to − 0.008). Medicare expenditure on chronic care-related services consistently contributed to progressivity of the overall scheme, particularly services under the CDDS with a need-adjusted concentration index of − 0.205 (95% CI, − 0.208 to − 0.201). Uptake of chronic care items varied by locality and comorbid conditions (there was greater uptake by patients with one or more comorbid conditions).
Conclusions: Chronic care items, particularly dental items, have primarily been used by individuals from lower income households. Uptake of chronic care items contributes to the overall progressivity of Medicare.
- 1. van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, Koolman X; OECD Health Equity Research Group. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ 2006; 174: 177-183.
- 2. Biggs A. Medicare — background brief. 2004. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Publications_Archive/archive/medicare (accessed Sep 2012).
- 3. Lairson DR, Hindson P, Hauquitz A. Equity of health care in Australia. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 475-482.
- 4. van Doorslaer E, Clarke P, Savage E, Hall J. Horizontal inequities in Australia’s mixed public/private health care system. Health Policy 2008; 86: 97-108.
- 5. O’Donnell O, van Doorlsaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing health equity using household survey data. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute, 2007. http://go.worldbank.org/LVSSZJX9O0 (accessed Sep 2012).
- 6. Department of Health and Ageing. MBS Primary Care Items. Chronic Disease Management (CDM) Medicare Items. 2011. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mbsprimarycare-chronicdiseasemanagement (accessed Mar 2012).
- 7. Department of Health and Ageing. Dental Health. Chronic Disease Dental Scheme. 2011. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/dental+care+services (accessed Mar 2012).
- 8. Heeley EL, Peiris DP, Patel AA, et al. Cardiovascular risk perception and evidence–practice gaps in Australian general practice (the AusHEART study). Med J Aust 2010; 192: 254-259. <MJA full text>
- 9. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population by age and sex, regions of Australia, 2008. Canberra: ABS, 2009. (ABS Cat. No. 3235.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3235.0Main+Features12008?OpenDocument (accessed Jun 2012).
- 10. Hagenaars A, de Vos K, Zaidi MA. Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: research based on micro-data. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community, 1994.
- 11. Department of Health and Ageing. Medicare Benefits Schedule Book. Canberra: DoHA, 2008. http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/C08AD6216BF5A5F4CA2574F80001AA0E/$File/200811Complete.pdf (accessed Mar 2012).
- 12. Kakwani NC. Measurement of tax progressivity: an international comparison. Economic Journal 1977; 87: 71-80.
- 13. Wagstaff A, Paci P, van Doorslaer E. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 1991; 33: 545-557.
- 14. Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Equity in health care finance and delivery. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of health economics. Vol IB. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, 2000: 1803-1862.
- 15. Kakwani N, Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation, and statistical inference. J Econometrics 1997; 77: 87-103.
- 16. Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E, Paci P. Equity in the finance and delivery of health care: some tentative cross-country comparisons. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 1989; 5: 89-112. doi:10.1093/oxrep/5.1.89.
- 17. Palfreeman V, Zoellner H. Description of comprehensive dental services supported by the Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme in the first 23 months of operation. Aust N Z J Public Health 2012; 36: 69-75.
- 18. Dunlevy S. Tanya Plibersek to reform dental scheme. The Australian 2011; 14 Dec. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/health/tanya-plibersek-to-reform-dental-scheme/story-fn59nokw-1226221317090 (accessed Sep 2012).
- 19. Department of Health and Ageing. Dental health. Final report of the National Advisory Council on Dental Health. Canberra: DoHA, 2012. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing. nsf/Content/final-report-of-national-advisory-council-on-dental-health.htm (accessed Mar 2012).
- 20. Gerdtham U, Johannesson M. Income-related inequality in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years. J Health Econ 2000; 19: 1007-1026.
- 21. Clarke P, Leal J, Kelman C, et al. Estimating the cost of complications of diabetes in Australia using administrative health-care data. Value Health 2008; 11: 199-206.
- 22. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Health Survey: summary of results. (ABS Cat. No. 4364.0.) www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4364.0 (accessed Mar 2012).
- 23. Women’s Health Australia. How to access ALSWH data. 2012. http://www.alswh.org.au/accessingdata.html (accessed Mar 2012).
- 24. Sax Institute. The 45 and Up Study. Information for researchers. 2007. http://www.45andup.org. au/applyingtousethestudyresource.aspx (accessed Mar 2012).
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.