Medical education reform can make an important contribution to the future health care of populations. Social accountability in medical education was defined by the World Health Organization in 1995, and an international movement for change is gathering momentum.
Priority community needs are generally not well reflected in existing medical curricula. Medical schools have often been concerned more with prestige, research competitiveness and training doctors for narrow specialist careers in urban areas.
Orthodoxies in medical education have been challenged where the gap between a community’s health care needs and the availability of doctors has been greatest — notably in rural areas and, in Australia, in Aboriginal communities.
At a time of growing crisis in health care systems, the need to focus on addressing health inequalities and delivering effective, affordable, people-centred health care is more important than ever.
While change can be enabled with policy levers, such as funding tied to achieving equity outcomes and systems of accreditation, medical schools and students themselves can lead the transformation agenda. An international movement for change and coalitions of medical schools with an interest in socially accountable medical education provide a “community of practice” that can drive change from within.
- 1. Boelen C, Heck J. Defining and measuring the social accountability of medical schools. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1995 (Unpublished document WHO/HRH/95.7, available on request from Division of Organization and Management of Health Systems, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.)
- 2. Boelen C. A new paradigm for medical schools a century after Flexner’s report. Bull World Health Organ 2002; 80: 592-593.
- 3. Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ 2009; 43: 887-894.
- 4. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta Z, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010; 376: 1923-1958.
- 5. Ho K, Buote D, Jarvis-Selinger S, et al. Achieving social accountability through interprofessional collaboration: the Canadian medical schools experience. J Interprof Care 2008; 22 Suppl 1: 4-14.
- 6. Pálsdóttir B, Neusy AJ, Reed G. Building the evidence base: networking innovative socially accountable medical educational programs. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2008; 21: 177. http://www.educationforhealth.net/publishedarticles/article_print_177.pdf (accessed Apr 2012).
- 7. Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. The future of medical education in Canada (FMEC): a collective vision for MD education. Ottawa: AFMC, 2010. http://www.afmc.ca/future-of-medical-education-in-canada/medical-doctor-project/pdf/collective_vision.pdf (accessed Apr 2012).
- 8. Skochelak S. A decade of reports calling for change in medical education: what do they say? Acad Med 2010; 85 (9 Suppl): S26-S33.
- 9. World Health Organization. The world health report 2006: working together for health 2006. Geneva: WHO, 2006. http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/index.html (accessed Apr 2012).
- 10. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Building a 21st century primary health care system: Australia’s first national primary health care strategy. Canberra: DoHA, 2010. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/report-primaryhealth (accessed Apr 2012).
- 11. World Health Organization. Health Workforce. Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention. Global policy recommendations. Geneva: WHO, 2010. http://www.who.int/hrh/retention/guidelines/en/index.html (accessed Apr 2012).
- 12. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Report on the audit of health workforce in rural and regional Australia, April 2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2008. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/4F3A981914316A11CA257434008189EC/$File/ruraud.pdf (accessed Apr 2012).
- 13. Kaufman A. Measuring the social responsiveness of medical schools: a case study from New Mexico. Acad Med 1999; 74 (8 Suppl): S69-S74.
- 14. Heath C, Stoddart C, Green H. Parental backgrounds of Otago medical students. N Z Med J 2002; 115: U237.
- 15. Dhalla I, Kwong J, Streiner D, et al. Characteristics of first-year students in Canadian medical schools CMAJ 2002; 166: 1029-1035.
- 16. Block S, Chiarelli N, Peters A, et al. Academia’s chilly climate for primary care. JAMA 1996; 276: 677-682.
- 17. Hewett D, Gallois C, Ward M, et al. Intergroup communication between hospital doctors: implications for quality of patient care. Soc Sci Med 2009; 69: 1732-1740.
- 18. Rourke J. Social accountability in theory and practice. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4 Suppl 1: S45-S48; discussion S58-S60.
- 19. Mullan F, Chen C, Petterson S, et al. The social mission of medical education: ranking the schools. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 804-811.
- 20. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural, regional and remote health: indicators of health system performance. Canberra: AIHW, 2008. (AIHW Cat. No. PHE 103.) http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468150 (accessed Apr 2012).
- 21. Dunbabin J, Levitt L. Rural origin and rural medical exposure: their impact on the rural and remote medical workforce in Australia. Rural Remote Health [internet] 2003; 3: 212. Epub 2003 Jun 25.
- 22. Hsueh W, Wilkinson T, Bills J. What evidence-based undergraduate interventions promote rural health? Hsueh W, Wilkinson T, Bills J. What evidence-based undergraduate interventions promote rural health? N Z Med J 2004; 117: U1117. http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1204/1117/ (accessed Apr 2012).
- 23. Gray JD, Steeves LC, Blackburn JW. The Dalhousie University experience of training residents in many small communities. Acad Med 1994; 69: 847-851.
- 24. Grobler L, Marais BJ, Mabunda SA, et al. Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1): CD005314.
- 25. Strasser R, Neusy AJ. Context counts: training health workers in and for rural and remote areas. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 777-782.
- 26. Blue AV, Chessman AW, Geesey ME, et al. Medical students’ perceptions of rural practice following a rural clerkship. Fam Med 2004; 36: 336-340.
- 27. Sen Gupta TK, Murray RB, McDonell A, et al. Rural internships for final year students: clinical experience, education and workforce. Rural Remote Health [internet] 2008; 8: 827. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
- 28. Chater A. Looking after health care in the bush. Aust Health Rev 2008; 32: 313-318.
- 29. Prideaux D, Worley P, Bligh J. Symbiosis: a new model for medical education. Clin Teach 2007; 4: 209-212.
- 30. Worley P, Esterman D, Prideaux D. Cohort analysis of examination performance of undergraduate medical student learning in community settings. BMJ 2004; 328: 207-209.
- 31. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: an overview 2011. Canberra: AIHW, 2011. (AIHW Cat. No. IHW 42.) http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737418989 (accessed Apr 2012).
- 32. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Access to health and services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Canberra: AIHW, 2011. (AIHW Cat. No. IHW 46.) http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737418966 (accessed Apr 2012).
- 33. Office of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health. A National Aboriginal Health Strategy. Canberra: OATSIH, 1989. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-oatsih-pubs-NAHS1998 (accessed Apr 2012).
- 34. Committee of Deans of Australian Medical Schools, Australian Indigenous Doctors’ Association. CDAMS Indigenous Health Curriculum Framework. Melbourne: ONEMDA and Koorie Press, 2004. http://www.limenetwork. net.au/files/lime/cdamsframeworkreport.pdf (accessed Apr 2012).
- 35. Hafferty F, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med 1994; 69: 861-871.
- 36. Garvey G, Rolfe I, Pearson S, et al. Indigenous Australian medical students’ perceptions of their medical school training. Med Educ 2009; 43: 1047-1055.
- 37. Cha S, Ross J, Lurie P, et al. Description of a research-based health activism curriculum for medical students. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 1325-1328.
- 38. Papadimos TJ, Murray SJ. Foucault’s “fearless speech” and the transformation and mentoring of medical students. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2008; 3: 12.
- 39. Ewen SC. Unequal treatment: the possibilities of and need for indigenous parrhesiastes in Australian medical education. J Immigr Minor Health 2011; 13: 609-615.
- 40. Parliament of Australia. Senate standing committee on rural and regional affairs and transport. Inquiry into rural and regional access to secondary and tertiary education opportunities. Canberra: The Senate, 2009. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=rrat_ctte/rural_and_regional_education/index.htm (accessed Apr 2012).
- 41. King S, Garrett R, Wrench A, et al. The loneliness of relocating: does the transition to university pose a significant health risk for rural and isolated students? Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference; 2011 Jun 28 – Jul 1; Freemantle, Australia. http://www.fyhe. com.au/past_papers/papers11/FYHE-2011/content/pdf/16B.pdf (accessed Apr 2012).
- 42. Kamien M. Rural student clubs and the social responsibility of medical schools. Aust J Rural Health 1996; 4: 237-241.
- 43. National Rural Health Students’ Network. Rural health clubs [website] 2011. http://www.nrhsn.org.au/site/index.cfm?display=39703 (accessed Apr 2012).
- 44. Turner J, Scott L. University rural health clubs: nurturing the future Australian rural workforce. Rural Remote Health [internet] 2007; 7: 649. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
- 45. THEnet: Training for Health Equity Network. Social accountability in action. THEnet’s evaluation framework for socially accountable health professional education. Version 1.0. Monograph 1. Brussels: The Training for Health Equity Network, 2011. http://thenetcommunity.org/files/articles/Monograph% 20print%20quality%20feb%201.pdf (accessed Apr 2012).
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.