Objective: The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) has proposed new criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of GDM when IADPSG criteria were used with the prevalence when the current Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) criteria were used.
Design, setting and participants: This was a prospective study over a 6-month period, examining the results of all glucose tolerance tests (GTTs) conducted for the diagnosis of GDM in Wollongong, a city using the public and private sectors.
Results: There were 1275 evaluable GTTs (571 public and 704 private). Using the current ADIPS diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of GDM was 8.6% (public), 10.5% (private) and 9.6% (overall). Using the proposed IADPSG criteria, the prevalence of GDM was 9.1% (public), 16.2% (private) and 13.0% (overall).
Conclusions: The proposed IADPSG criteria would increase the prevalence of GDM from 9.6% to 13.0% (P < 0.001). In our study in the Wollongong area, which has a population with a predominantly white background, this increase came mainly from older women attending a private pathology provider. Data from both the public and private sectors need to be included in any discussion on the change in prevalence of GDM.
- 1. Silverman BL, Metzger BE, Cho NH, Loeb CA. Impaired glucose tolerance in adolescent offspring of diabetic mothers. Relationship to fetal hyperinsulinism. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 611-617.
- 2. American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diab Care 2002; 25 Suppl 1: S94-S96.
- 3. O’Sullivan JB, Mahan CM. Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes 1964; 13: 278-285.
- 4. Martin FIR; ad hoc working party. The diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Med J Aust 1991; 155: 112.
- 5. Hoffmann L, Nolan C, Wilson JD, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus — management guidelines. The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 93-97. <MJA full text>
- 6. Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR; the HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1991-2002.
- 7. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al; Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2477-2486.
- 8. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1339-1348.
- 9. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, et al. IADPSG recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 676-682.
- 10. Moses R, Griffiths R, McPherson S. The incidence of gestational diabetes in the Illawarra area of New South Wales. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 34: 425-427.
- 11. Moses RG, Webb AJ, Comber CD, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: compliance with testing. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43: 469-470.
- 12. Moses RG, Colagiuri S. The extent of undiagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus in New South Wales. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 14-16. <MJA full text>
- 13. Hadden DR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, et al; the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study Cooperative Research Group. Screening and prevention of gestational diabetes [abstract of oral presentation]. Diabetologia 2010; 53 Suppl 1: S9.
- 14. Laws P, Sullivan EA. Australia’s mothers and babies 2007. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2009. (AIHW Cat. No. PER 48; Perinatal Statistics Series No. 23.) http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/per/per-48-10972/per-48-10972.pdf (accessed Jan 2011).
- 15. Flack JR, Ross GP, Ho S, McElduff A. Recommended changes to diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: impact on workload. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50: 439-443.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.