Although difficult to quantify, there is known widespread variation in the way that best available evidence is applied in clinical practice.
The reasons for gaps between evidence and practice are complex, and efforts to improve uptake are unlikely to be successful if they are one-dimensional or focus on individual health professionals.
This article provides contextual reference for articles in this Supplement in addressing how and why clinical variation exists, the importance of reducing it and strategies to drive a more streamlined approach to evidence-based care in Australian health care systems.
- 1. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Evidence–practice gaps report. Vol 1. Melbourne: NICS, 2003.
- 2. Buchan H. Gaps between best evidence and practice: causes for concern. Med J Aust 2004; 180 (6 Suppl): S48-S49. <MJA full text>
- 3. Buchan H, Sewell JR, Sweet M. Translating evidence into practice. Med J Aust 2004; 180: S43. <MJA full text>
- 4. Grol R, Buchan H. Clinical guidelines: what can we do to increase their use? Med J Aust 2006; 185: 301-302. <MJA full text>
- 5. Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997; 157: 408-416.
- 6. Evensen AE, Sanson-Fisher R, E’Este C, et al. Trends in publications regarding evidence-practice gaps: a literature review. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 11.
- 7. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ 2002; 325: 961-964.
- 8. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2635-2645.
- 9. Fisher ES, Bynum JP, Skinner JS. Slowing the growth of health care costs — lessons from regional variation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 849-852.
- 10. Chalkidou K, Tunis S, Lopert R, et al. Comparative effectiveness research and evidence-based health policy: experience from four countries. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 339-367.
- 11. Weinstein MC, Skinner JA. Comparative effectiveness and health care spending — implications for reform. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 460-465.
- 12. National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines for the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC, 1995.
- 13. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Evidence–practice gaps report. Vol 2. Melbourne: NICS, 2003.
- 14. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Evidence–practice gaps report. Vol 1: a review of developments: 2004–2007. Melbourne: NICS, 2003.
- 15. Garling P. Final report of the Special Commission of Inquiry: acute care services in NSW public hospitals. Sydney: NSW Government, 27 Nov 2008.
- 16. Clinical Excellence Commission [website]. http://www.cec.health.nsw. gov.au/ (accessed Aug 2010).
- 17. Clinical Excellence Commission. Chartbook. Quality of healthcare in NSW. 2008. Sydney: CEC, 2010. http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/programs/chartbook.html (accessed Aug 2010).
- 18. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003; 362: 1225-1230.
- 19. Fisher ES, Berwick DM, Davis K. Achieving health care reform — how physicians can help. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2495-2497.
- 20. Hains IM, Fuller JM, Ward RL, Pearson SA. Standardizing care in medical oncology. Cancer 2009; 115: 5579-5588.
- 21. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Identifying barriers to evidence uptake. Melbourne: NICS, 2006.
- 22. Clinical Excellence Commission. Understanding and influencing blood prescription. A market research report prepared by Eureka Strategic Research for the Clinical Excellence Commission and the National Blood Authority. December 2007. Sydney: CEC, 2007.
- 23. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Do guidelines make a difference to health care outcomes? http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/nics/material_resources/resources/do_guidelines.htm (accessed Aug 2010).
- 24. Yonek J, Hines S, Joshi MA. A guide to achieving high performance in multi-hospital health systems. March 2010. Chicago: Health Research and Educational Trust, 2010.
- 25. Australian Satellite of the Cochrane EPOC Group [website]. http://www.epoc.nhmrc.gov.au/ (accessed Aug 2010).
- 26. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Clinical Practice Guidelines Portal [website]. http://www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au/ (accessed Aug 2010).
- 27. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA 2008; 300: 436-438.
- 28. Sepucha KR, Fowler FJ, Mulley AG. Policy support for patient-centred care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Aff [web exclusive] 2004; 7 Oct: VAR-55. http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.var.54v1?ck=nck (accessed Aug 2010).
- 29. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2725-2734.
- 30. The Health Foundation. Patient safety update. London: Health Foundation; 2009. http://www.health.org.uk/document.rm?id=1189 (accessed Aug 2010).
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.