Design, setting and participants: A secondary analysis of data obtained from 1677 Australian workers aged 18 years or older collected as part of a broader national study into the third-party harms of alcohol. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted between October and mid December 2008.
Main outcome measures: Self-reported measures of the time spent covering for other people at work because of their alcohol drinking; measures of other impacts from co-workers’ alcohol drinking; and self-reported income.
Results: Around a third of Australian workers have experienced negative effects from their co-workers’ alcohol drinking, with 3.5% of workers reporting having to work extra hours to cover for others. The total annual cost to the Australian economy of this extra work is estimated to be $453 million.
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that Australian workers are significantly affected by other people’s alcohol drinking, at considerable cost. This finding highlights the significant cost to the workplace of alcohol consumption, extending previous work which has focused only on alcohol-related absenteeism.
- 1. Room R, Graham K, Rehm J, et al. Drinking and its burden in a global perspective: policy considerations and options. Eur Addict Res 2003; 9: 165-175.
- 2. Room R. Concepts and items in measuring social harm from drinking. J Subst Abuse 2000; 12: 93-111.
- 3. Klingemann H. Alcohol and its social consequences — the forgotten dimension. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2001.
- 4. Collins DJ, Lapsley HM. The costs of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug abuse to Australian society in 2004/05. National Drug Strategy monograph no. 64. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2008.
- 5. McGhee SM, Ho LM, Lapsley HM, et al. Cost of tobacco-related diseases, including passive smoking, in Hong Kong. Tob Control 2006; 15: 125-130.
- 6. Braithwaite V, Devine C. Life satisfaction and adjustment of children of alcoholics: the effects of parental drinking, family disorganization and survival roles. Br J Clin Psychol 1993; 32: 417-429.
- 7. Pidd KJ, Berry JG, Roche AM, Harrison JE. Estimating the cost of alcohol-related absenteeism in the Australian workforce: the importance of consumption patterns. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 637-641. <MJA full text>
- 8. Wilkinson C, Laslett A-M, Ferris J, et al. The range and magnitude of alcohol’s harm to others: study design, data collection procedures and measurement. Melbourne: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, 2009.
- 9. Roche AM, Pidd K, Berry JG, Harrison JE. Workers’ drinking patterns: the impact on absenteeism in the Australian work-place. Addiction 2008; 103: 738-748.
- 10. Jones S, Casswell S, Zhang JF. The economic costs of alcohol-related absenteeism and reduced productivity among the working population of New Zealand. Addiction 1995; 90: 1455-1461.
- 11. UK Cabinet Office. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. Alcohol Harm Reduction Project: interim analytical report. London: Strategy Unit, 2004.
- 12. UK Cabinet Office. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. Alcohol misuse: how much does it cost? London: Strategy Unit, 2003.
- 13. Wiese JG, Shlipak MG, Browner WS. The alcohol hangover. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 897-902.
- 14. Single E, Robson L, Xie X, Rehm J. The economic costs of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs in Canada, 1992. Addiction 1998; 93: 991-1006.
- 15. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian labour market statistics, Jul 2009. (ABS Cat. No. 6105.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/6105.0Jul%202 009?Open Document (accessed Aug 2009).
- 16. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: first results. Drug statistics series no. 20. Canberra: AIHW, 2008. (AIHW cat. no. PHE 98.)
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.