Improving implementation of evidence-based prevention in primary care

Danielle Mazza and Mark F Harris
Med J Aust 2010; 193 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03814.x
Published online: 19 July 2010

For effective preventive care, policies and programs are needed that provide incentives, address workforce roles, utilise information systems and empower patients

With an ageing population, a stretched health budget, and mounting costs associated with increasing levels of chronic disease, prevention is a priority for all Australian governments. But how effectively is evidence-based preventive care currently being provided in general practice? Rates of cancer screening by general practitioners have improved dramatically,1 but there has been less progress in other aspects of preventive care — for example, fewer than 30% of patients at risk of chronic disease are routinely given advice about diet or physical activity, and only 10% are referred to other health care practitioners for interventions.2

  • Danielle Mazza1
  • Mark F Harris2

  • 1 Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.


Competing interests:

We are both members of the RACGP National Standing Committee — Quality Care and “Red Book” editorial taskforce.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.