Design, setting and participants: An anonymous online survey of 1050 Australians aged 18 years or older (stratified by sex, age and location) using contextualised questions, conducted between 28 and 31 July 2008.
Results: Our study showed a high level of support for access to early abortion; 87% of respondents indicated that abortion should be lawful in the first trimester (61% unconditionally and 26% depending on the circumstances). In most of the clinical and social circumstances described in our survey, a majority of respondents indicated that doctors should not face professional sanctions for performing abortion after 24 weeks’ gestation.
Conclusions: Our data show that a majority of Australians support laws which enable women to access abortion services after 24 weeks’ gestation, and that support varies depending on circumstances. Simple yes/no polls may give a misleading picture of public opinion.
- 1. Victorian Law Reform Commission. Law of abortion: final report. Melbourne: VLRC, 2008. http://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/justlib/law+reform/home/completed+projects/abortion/lawreform+-+law+of+abortion_+final+report (accessed Feb 2010).
- 2. de Crespigny LJ, Savulescu J. Abortion: time to clarify Australia’s confusing laws. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 201-203. <MJA full text>
- 3. de Costa C. Exodus in search of safe abortion: abortion law. The Australian 2009; 12 Sep.
- 4. Overington C. Legal abortions on state agenda. The Australian 2009; 9 Mar. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25157850-2702,00.html (accessed Feb 2010).
- 5. Gibson R, Wilson S, Denemark D, et al; ACSPRI Centre for Social Research. Australian Survey of Social Attitudes, 2003 [computer file]. Canberra: Australian Social Science Data Archives, Australian National University, 2004. http://nesstar.assda.edu.au/webview/index.jsp?v=2& mode=documentation&submode=abstract &study=http%3A%2F%2Fnesstar.assda.edu.au %3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2Fau.edu.anu.assda.ddi.01070&top=yes (accessed May 2010).
- 6. Betts K. Attitudes to abortion in Australia: 1972 to 2003. People Place 2004; 12 (4): 22-28.
- 7. Australian Federation of Right to Life Associations. What Australians really think about abortion — national opinion poll of 1200 Australians [media release]. http://www.righttolife.asn.au/media_releases/20060205.pdf (accessed Feb 2010).
- 8. Euro RSCG; TNS Sofres. European values (May 2005). http://www.thebrusselsconnection.be/tbc/upload/attachments/European%20Values %20Overall%20EN.pdf (accessed Feb 2010).
- 9. Polling Report. Abortion and birth control. 2010. http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm (accessed Feb 2010).
- 10. Straton J, Godman K, Gee V. Induced abortion in Western Australia 1999–2004: report of the WA Abortion Notification System. Perth: Government of Western Australia Department of Health, 2005. http://rtc.org.au/publications/documents/Abortion%20Report%20FINAL2. pdf (accessed Feb 2010).
- 11. Chan A, Scott J, Nguyen A, Sage L. Pregnancy outcome in South Australia 2007. Adelaide: Pregnancy Outcome Unit, SA Health, 2008. http://www.health.sa.gov.au/pehs/PDF-files/090210-pregnancy-outcome-report-2007.pdf (accessed Feb 2010).
- 12. Davies J. 32 weeks 5 years. The Bulletin (Sydney) 18 Dec 2007 – 8 Jan 2008: 42.
- 13. YouGov/Daily Telegraph Survey Results. 2005. http://www.yougov.co.uk/extranets/ygarchives/content/pdf/TEL050101042_1.pdf (accessed Feb 2010).
- 14. Saad L. Americans walk the middle road on abortion. Gallup 2000; 10 Apr. http://www.gallup.com/poll/3016/Americans-Walk-Middle-Road-Abortion.aspx (accessed Feb 2010).
- 15. Lavrakas P. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. London: Sage, 2008: 129, 849.
- 16. Gomm R. Key concepts in social research methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009: 390-391.
- 17. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population by age and sex, Australian states and territories, Jun 2009. Canberra: ABS, 2009. (ABS Cat. No. 3201.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3201.0 (accessed Feb 2010).
- 18. Miller N. Support widespread for late-term abortion. The Age (Melbourne) 2008; 18 Aug: 2. http://www.theage.com.au/national/support-widespread-for-lateterm-abortion-20080817-3x2s.html (accessed Feb 2010).
- 19. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: NHMRC, 2007. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e72syn.htm (accessed Feb 2010).
- 20. Upton G, Cook I. A dictionary of statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006: 92-95.
- 21. Dodge Y. The concise encyclopedia of statistics. New York: Springer, 2008: 108-110.
- 22. Lefever S, Dal M, Matthíasdóttir A. Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. Br J Educ Technol 2007; 38: 574-582.
- 23. Healey NM, Baron S, Ilieva J. Online surveys in marketing research: pros and cons. Int J Mark Res 2002; 44 (3): 361-382.
- 24. Stanton JM. An empirical assessment of data collection using the internet. Pers Psychol 1998; 51 (3): 709-725.
- 25. de Crespigny L, Chervenak F, Coquel PA, et al. Practicing prenatal diagnosis within the law. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 489-494.
- 26. de Crespigny LJ, Savulescu J. Pregnant women with fetal abnormalities: the forgotten people in the abortion debate. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 100-103. <MJA full text>
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.