Connect
MJA
MJA

Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991–2006: differences in outcomes

Robyn M Kennare, Marc J N C Keirse, Graeme R Tucker and Annabelle C Chan
Med J Aust 2010; 192 (2): 76-80.

Summary

Objective: To examine differences in outcomes between planned home births, occurring at home or in hospital, and planned hospital births.

Design and setting: Population-based study using South Australian perinatal data on all births and perinatal deaths during the period 1991–2006. Analysis included logistic regression adjusted for predictor variables and standardised perinatal mortality ratios.

Main outcome measures: Perinatal death, intrapartum death, death attributed to intrapartum asphyxia, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, use of specialised neonatal care, operative delivery, perineal injury and postpartum haemorrhage.

Results: Planned home births accounted for 0.38% of 300 011 births in South Australia. They had a perinatal mortality rate similar to that for planned hospital births (7.9 v 8.2 per 1000 births), but a sevenfold higher risk of intrapartum death (95% CI, 1.53–35.87) and a 27-fold higher risk of death from intrapartum asphyxia (95% CI, 8.02–88.83). Review of perinatal deaths in the planned home births group identified inappropriate inclusion of women with risk factors for home birth and inadequate fetal surveillance during labour. Low Apgar scores were more frequent among planned home births, and use of specialised neonatal care as well as rates of postpartum haemorrhage and severe perineal tears were lower among planned home births, but these differences were not statistically significant. Planned home births had lower caesarean section and instrumental delivery rates, and a seven times lower episiotomy rate than planned hospital births.

Conclusions: Perinatal safety of home births may be improved substantially by better adherence to risk assessment, timely transfer to hospital when needed, and closer fetal surveillance.

  • Robyn M Kennare1
  • Marc J N C Keirse2
  • Graeme R Tucker1
  • Annabelle C Chan1

  • 1 Epidemiology Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, SA.
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.


Competing interests:

Marc Keirse was the main architect and the chairperson of the working party that developed the Policy for Planned Birth at Home in South Australia.

  • 1. Chan A, Scott J, Nguyen A-M, Sage L. Pregnancy outcome in South Australia 2006. Adelaide: Pregnancy Outcome Unit, SA Health, Government of South Australia, 2007. http://www.health.sa.gov.au/pehs/pregnancyoutcome.htm (accessed Apr 2009).
  • 2. Laws PJ, Hilder L. Australia’s mothers and babies 2006. Perinatal Statistics Series No. 22. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2008.
  • 3. Roberts C, Tracey S, Peat B. Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia; population based descriptive study. BMJ 2000; 321: 137-141.
  • 4. Department of Health, South Australia. Policy for planned birth at home in South Australia. Adelaide: Government of South Australia, 2007. http://www.health.sa.gov.au/PPG/Default.aspx?tabid=189 (accessed Dec 2009).
  • 5. Crotty M, Ramsay AT, Smart R, Chan A. Planned homebirths in South Australia 1976–1987. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 664-671.
  • 6. Woodcock HC, Read AW, Bower C, et al. A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981–1987. Midwifery 1994; 10: 125-135.
  • 7. Parratt J, Johnston J. Planned homebirths in Victoria, 1995–1998. Aust J Midwifery 2002; 15: 16-25.
  • 8. Bastian H, Keirse MJNC, Lancaster PAL. Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study. BMJ 1998; 317: 384-388.
  • 9. Keirse MJNC. Interaction between primary and secondary antenatal care, with particular reference to the Netherlands. In: Enkin M, Chalmers I, editors. Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care. London: William Heineman, 1982: 222-233.
  • 10. Mehl-Madrona L, Mehl-Madrona M. Physician- and midwife-attended home births. Effects of breech, twin, and post-dates outcome data on mortality rates. J Nurse Midwifery 1997; 42: 91-98.
  • 11. Maternal, Perinatal and Infant Mortality Committee. Maternal, perinatal and infant mortality in South Australia 2007. Twenty-second report of the Maternal, Perinatal and Infant Mortality Committee on maternal, perinatal and post-neonatal deaths in 2007 including the South Australian protocol for investigation of stillbirths. Adelaide: SA Health, Government of South Australia, 2008. http://www.health .sa.gov.au/pehs/pregnancyoutcome.htm (accessed Apr 2009).
  • 12. Roberts CL, Lancaster PAL. Australian national birthweight percentiles by gestational age. Med J Aust 1999; 170: 114-118. <MJA full text>
  • 13. Lumley J. Births at home: facts and fictions. Aust Fam Physician 1985; 14: 1104-1106, 1108.
  • 14. Newman LA. Why planned attended homebirth should be more widely supported in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 450-453.
  • 15. Hosmer L. Home birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001; 44: 671-680.
  • 16. Young D. Home birth in the United States: action and reaction. Birth 2008; 35: 263-265.
  • 17. Campbell R, Macfarlane A. Where to be born? The debate and the evidence. 2nd ed. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 1994.
  • 18. Steer P. Editor-in-chief’s response to: An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG 2008; 115: 1185.
  • 19. Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG 2008; 115: 554-559.
  • 20. Wiegers TA, Keirse MJNC, van der Zee J, Berghs GAH. Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the Netherlands. BMJ 1996; 313: 1309-1313.
  • 21. de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009; 116: 1177-1184.
  • 22. Hendrix M, Van Horck M, Moreta D, et al. Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in the Netherlands. BJOG 2009; 116: 537-544.
  • 23. Dowswell T, Thornton JG, Hewison J, et al. Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom? BMJ 1996; 312: 753-757.
  • 24. Wiegers TA, van der Zee J, Kerssens JJ, Keirse MJNC. Home birth or short-stay hospital birth in a low risk population in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 1505-1511.
  • 25. Amelink-Verburg M, Verloove-Vanhorick S, Hakkenberg R, et al. Evaluation of 280 000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study. BJOG 2008; 115: 570-578.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.