Clinical handover is an area of critical concern, because deficiencies in handover pose a patient safety risk. Redesign of handover must allow for input from frontline staff to ensure that designs fit into existing practices and settings.
The HELiCS (Handover — Enabling Learning in Communication for Safety) tool uses a “video-reflexive” technique: handover encounters are videotaped and played back to the practitioners involved for analysis and discussion.
Using the video-reflexive process, staff of an emergency department and an intensive care unit at two different tertiary hospitals redesigned their handover processes.
The HELiCS study gave staff greater insight into previously unrecognised clinical and operational problems, enhanced coordination and efficiency of care, and strengthened junior–senior communication and teaching.
Our study showed that reflexive and “bottom-up” handover redesign can produce outcomes that harbour local fit, practitioner ownership and (to date) sustainability.
- 1. Garling P. Final report of the Special Commission of Inquiry: acute care services in NSW public hospitals. Sydney: NSW Government, 2008. http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/Special_Projects/ll_splprojects.nsf/pages/acsi_finalreport (accessed Apr 2009).
- 2. Hindle D, Braithwaite J, Iedema R. Patient safety: a review of key international enquiries. Sydney: Clinical Excellence Commission, 2005.
- 3. World Health Organization. Action on patient safety — high 5s. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/solutions/high5s/project_plan/en (accessed May 2009).
- 4. Australian Medical Association. Safe handover: safe patients. Guidance on clinical handover for clinicians and managers. Canberra: AMA, 2006. http://www.ama.com.au/node/4064 (accessed Mar 2009).
- 5. Bomba DT, Prakash R. A description of handover processes in an Australian public hospital. Aust Health Rev 2005; 29: 68-79.
- 6. Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 445-451.
- 7. Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32: 167-175.
- 8. Catchpole KR, de Leval MR, McEwan A, et al. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17: 470-478.
- 9. Eisenberg EM, Murphy AG, Sutcliffe K, et al. Communication in emergency medicine: implications for patient safety 1. Commun Monogr 2005; 72: 390-413.
- 10. Broekhuis M, Veldkamp C. The usefulness and feasibility of a reflexivity method to improve clinical handover. J Eval Clin Pract 2007; 13: 109-115.
- 11. Carroll K, Iedema R, Kerridge R. Reshaping ICU ward round practices using video-reflexive ethnography. Qual Health Res 2008; 18: 380-390.
- 12. Bero L, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 1998; 317: 465-468.
- 13. Grol R, Berwick D, Wensing M. On the trail of quality and safety in health care. BMJ 2008; 336: 74-76.
- 14. Iedema R, Merrick E, Rajbhandari D, et al. Viewing the taken-for-granted from under a different aspect: a video-based method in pursuit of patient safety. Int J Mult Res Approach. In press.
- 15. Iedema R, Merrick E. HELiCS: Handover — Enabling Learning in Communication for Safety: a handover improvement kit (booklet and DVD). Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2008.
- 16. Iedema R, Long D, Forsyth R, Lee B. Visibilizing clinical work: video ethnography in the contemporary hospital. Health Sociol Rev 2006; 15: 156-168.
- 17. Schön D. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
- 18. White SA, editor. Participatory video: images that transform and empower. London: Sage, 2003.
- 19. Iedema R, Forsyth R, Georgiou A, et al. Video-research in health: visibilizing the effects of computerizing clinical care. Qual Res J 2007; 6: 15-30.
- 20. Iedema R, Long D, Carroll K. Corridor communication, spatial design and patient safety: enacting and managing complexities. In: van Marrewijk A, Yanow D, editors. Space, meaning and organisation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. In press.
- 21. MacDougall D. The corporeal image: film, ethnography and the senses. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
- 22. Yanow D, Tsoukas H. What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. J Manage Stud. In press.
- 23. Weick K. Reduction of medical errors through mindful interdependence. In: Sutcliffe K, Rosenthal M, editors. Medical error. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004: 177-199.
- 24. Patterson ES. Structuring flexibility: the potential good, bad and ugly in standardisation of handovers. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17: 4-5.
- 25. Timmermans S, Berg M. The gold standard: the challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2003.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.