The Mood Assessment Program (MAP) is a computerised assessment and diagnostic program developed at the Black Dog Institute, Sydney, to assist with diagnostic subtyping and management of mood disorders.
MAP decision rules capture the applied research, informed by clinical expertise, that has been undertaken over the past two decades.
Preliminary validation studies suggest the MAP possesses acceptable validity for key diagnostic decisions, including determination of polarity and depressive subtype, and the presence or absence of the principal anxiety disorders.
The MAP provides a rich set of information to help the practitioner derive a broad formulation and so shape a management plan in conjunction with broad treatment guidelines.
The program will be rolled out over the next 6 months as a formal evaluative tool for wide assessment and application by general practitioners, and subsequently to assist a broader range of health practitioners.
- 1. Carroll BJ. Diagnostic validity and laboratory studies: rules of the game. In: Robins LN, Barrett JE, editors. The validity of psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Raven Press, 1989: 229-245.
- 2. Parker G, Fletcher K, Barrett M, Manicavasagar V. The Black Dog Institute Depression Clinic: a subtyping model in practice. Australas Psychiatry 2006; 4: 300-303.
- 3. Kendell RE. Clinical validity. In: Robins LN, Barrett JE, editors. The validity of psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Raven Press, 1989: 305-321.
- 4. Judd LL, Akiskal HS. The prevalence and disability of bipolar spectrum disorders in the US population: re-analysis of the ECA database taking into account subthreshold cases. J Affect Disord 2003; 73: 123-131.
- 5. Baldessarini RJ, Tondo L, Hennen J. Treatment delays in bipolar disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 811-812.
- 6. Parker G, Roy K, Wilhelm K, Mitchell P. Assessing the comparative effectiveness of antidepressant therapies: a prospective clinical practice study. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62: 117-125.
- 7. Parker G, Manicavasagar V. Modelling and managing the depressive disorders: a clinical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
- 8. Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Tully L. Distinguishing bipolar and unipolar disorders: an isomer model. J Affect Disord 2006; 96: 67-73.
- 9. Parker G, Fletcher K, Barrett M, et al. Screening for bipolar disorder: the utility and comparative properties of the MSS and MDQ measures. J Affect Disord 2007; Dec 13 [Epub ahead of print].
- 10. Hirschfeld RM, Williams JB, Spitzer RL, et al. Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157: 1873-1875.
- 11. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
- 12. World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interview. CIDI-Auto Version 2.1. Sydney: Wild and Woolley, 1997.
- 13. Peters L, Andrews G. Procedural validity of the computerized version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) in the anxiety disorders. Psychol Med 1995; 25: 1269-1280.
- 14. Spitzer RL. Psychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary? Compr Psychiatry 1983; 24: 399-411.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.