Connect
MJA
MJA

Medical abortion for Australian women: it's time

Caroline M De Costa
Med J Aust 2005; 183 (7): 378-380.

Summary

  • Medical termination of pregnancy with mifepristone, a progesterone antagonist, is available to women in North America, the United Kingdom, much of Western Europe, Russia, China, Israel, New Zealand, Turkey and Tunisia, but not Australia.

  • Experience of mifepristone use in around two million abortions has shown that it is safe, effective, cheap to produce, and highly acceptable to women.

  • Mifepristone is usually used in combination with a prostaglandin analogue, such as misoprostol; these drugs have been added to the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines for developing countries.

  • Availability of this drug in Australia might largely overcome many of the inequities of access to abortion, and is critical for many women in rural areas and women in some ethnic groups whose access to surgical abortion is limited.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • Caroline M De Costa

  • James Cook University School of Medicine, Cairns, QLD.

Correspondence: 

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Recommendations on medical abortions issued to US obstetricians-gynecologists, 31 March 2001 [news release]. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr03-31-01-2.cfm (accessed Jun 2005).
  • 2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. National clinical guidelines. The care of women requesting induced abortion. London: RCOG, 2004.
  • 3. Dickerson V, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG letter on safety of RU-486, 7 December 2004 [news release]. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr12-07-04.cfm (accessed Jun 2005).
  • 4. Sparrow MJ. A woman’s choice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44: 88-92.
  • 5. Shannon CS, Winikoff B, Hausknecht R, et al. Multicenter trial of a simplified mifepristone medical abortion regimen. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 345-351.
  • 6. Schreiber CA, Creinin MD, Harwood B, Murthy AS. A pilot study of mifepristone and misoprostol administered at the same time for abortion in women with gestation from 50 to 63 days. Contraception 2005; 71: 447-450.
  • 7. Faucher B, Baunot N, Madelenat P. The efficacy and acceptability of mifepristone medical abortion with home administration misoprostol provided by private providers linked to the hospital: a prospective study of 433 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005; 33: 220-227.
  • 8. Hausknecht R. Mifeprex and misoprostol for early abortion: 4 years experience in the US. Presentation at the Annual Clinical Meeting of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 9 May 2005; San Francisco, Cal.
  • 9. World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance. Geneva: WHO, 2003.
  • 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Clostridium sordellii toxic shock syndrome after medical abortion with mifepristone and intravaginal misoprostol — United States and Canada, 2001-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005; 54: 724.
  • 11. Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. Termination of pregnancy at 9-13 weeks’ amenorrhoea with mifepristone and misoprostol. Lancet 1998; 352: 542-543.
  • 12. Baulieu EE. Contraception by the progesterone antagonist RU 486: a novel approach to human fertility control. Res Reprod 1987; 19: 3-4.
  • 13. Hogan SF, Ireland K. Fatal acute spontaneous endometritis resulting from Clostridium sordelli. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 91: 104-106.
  • 14. McGregor JA, Soper DE, Lovell G, Todd JK. Maternal deaths associated with Clostridium sordellii infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 987-995.
  • 15. Bartlett L, Berg C, Shulman H, et al. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 729-737.
  • 16. Gibson L. WHO puts abortifacients on its essential drugs list. BMJ 2005; 331: 68.
  • 17. De Crespigny LJ, Savulescu J. Abortion: time to clarify Australia’s confusing laws. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 201-203. <MJA full text>
  • 18. Chan A, Sage LC. Estimating Australia’s abortion rates 1985–2003. Med J Aust 2005; 182: 447-452. <MJA full text>

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.