Objectives: To describe the main media narratives in the reportage of singer Kylie Minogue’s illness with breast cancer; and to assess the impact of this coverage on bookings for screening for breast cancer by mammography in four Australian states.
Setting: Government sponsored BreastScreen programs in Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania and Western Australia.
Main outcome measures: Narratives on breast cancer in television news programs 17–27 May 2005; initial and re-screening bookings for mammograms.
Participants: Women aged ≥ 40 years who booked for mammograms in BreastScreen programs in the 19 weeks before, the 2 weeks during, and the 6 weeks after the publicity.
Results: There was a 20-fold increase in news coverage of breast cancer, which emphasised that young women do get breast cancer and that early detection was critical. Overall screening bookings rose 40% in the 2 weeks of the publicity, with a 101% increase in non-screened women in the eligible age-group 40–69 years. Six weeks after the publicity, bookings remained more than a third higher in non-screened women.
Conclusions: News coverage of Kylie Minogue’s breast cancer diagnosis caused an unprecedented increase in bookings for mammography. Health advocates should develop anticipatory strategies for responding to news coverage of celebrity illness.
- 1. Lawton B, Rose S, McLeod D, Dowell A. Changes in use of hormone replacement therapy after the report from the Women’s Health Initiative: cross sectional survey of users. BMJ 2003; 327: 845-846.
- 2. Cram P, Fendrick AM, Inadomi J, et al. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 1601-1605.
- 3. Howe A, Owen-Smith V, Richardson J. The impact of a television soap opera on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme in the North West of England. J Public Health Med 2002; 24: 299-304.
- 4. Larson RJ, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. Celebrity endorsements of cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 693-695.
- 5. Brown ML, Potosky AL. The presidential effect: the public health response to media coverage about Ronald Reagan’s colon cancer episode. Public Opin Q 1990; 54: 317-329.
- 6. Lane DS, Polednak AP, Burg MA. The impact of media coverage of Nancy Reagan’s experience on breast cancer screening. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 1551-1552.
- 7. Kalichman SC, Russell RL, Hunter TL, Sarwer DB. Earvin “Magic” Johnson’s HIV serostatus disclosure: effects on men’s perceptions of AIDS. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61: 887-891.
- 8. Jobes DA, Berman AL, O’Carroll PW, et al. The Kurt Cobain suicide crisis: perspectives from research, public health, and the news media. Suicide Life Threat Behav 1996; 26: 260-269.
- 9. Chapman S, Leask J. Paid celebrity endorsement in health promotion: a case study. Health Promot Int 2001; 16: 333-338.
- 10. Taylor R, Morrell S, Estoesta J, Brassil A. Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in New South Wales, Australia. Cancer Causes Control 2004; 15: 543-550.
- 11. BreastScreen Australia. Frequently asked questions. Available at: http://www.breastscreen.info.au/faq/index.htm (accessed Aug 2005).
- 12. Wakefield MA, Chaloupka FJ. Improving the measurement and use of tobacco control “inputs”. Tob Control 1998; 7: 333-335.
- 13. Chapman S. The news on tobacco control: time to bring the background into the foreground. Tob Control 1999; 8: 237-239.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.