Complementary and alternative medicine in 2006: optimising the dose of the intervention

Jonathan Berman and Margaret A Chesney
Med J Aust 2005; 183 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00038.x
Published online: 5 December 2005

If experimental conditions are not optimised, correct interpretation of results is difficult

Many people throughout the world use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). In the United States, for example, a survey of 31 044 adults aged 18 years or older indicated that 36% had used some form of CAM in the previous 12 months.1 This widespread use was one reason why, in 1998, the US Congress established the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) to conduct rigorous research on CAM practices. CAM includes the use of dietary supplements and other natural products; manipulative interventions such as massage; mind–body approaches such as meditation; energy interventions such as acupuncture; and whole medical systems such as traditional Chinese medicine. NCCAM’s mission includes disseminating authoritative information to the public and professional communities concerning which CAM practices are safe and effective and which are not.

  • Jonathan Berman1
  • Margaret A Chesney2

  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.