Objective: To determine the extent to which the Framingham function predicts the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in Aboriginal people.
Design and setting: Cohort study in an Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory.
Participants: 687 Aboriginal people aged 20–74 years were followed up from a baseline examination in 1992–1995 through to 31 December 2003.
Main outcome measure: First CHD events were identified through hospital and death records during the follow-up period.
Methods: An original Framingham function was used to predict CHD risk according to the duration of follow-up and the values of traditional risk factors, which included age, sex, total cholesterol level, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, blood pressure, the presence of diabetes, and smoking status. The predicted CHD incidence using the Framingham function was 4.4 per 1000 person-years, while the observed incidence was 11.0 (95% CI, 8.7–13.9) per 1000 person-years. The observed number of CHD events (68) was 2.5 times the number predicted (27) using the Framingham function. The observed incidence was about four and three times the predicted incidence for age groups < 35 and 35–44 years, respectively, and about twice the predicted incidence for those over 45 years of age. The Framingham function was a particularly unreliable predictor for women, especially younger women, in whom the observed CHD rate was 30 times the predicted rate.
Conclusions: The Framingham function substantially underestimates the actual risk of CHD observed in Aboriginal people in a remote community, especially for women and younger adults. This implies that traditional risk factors have different degrees of impact and/or that other factors are contributing to risk. A population-specific risk function is needed.
- 1. Heart, stroke and vascular diseases — Australian facts 2004. Cardiovascular Disease Series No. 22. Canberra: AIHW, National Heart Foundation of Australia, 2004. (AIHW Catalogue no. CVD27.) Available at: www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/10005 (accessed Nov 2004).
- 2. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. JAMA 2001; 285: 2486-2497.
- 3. Lipid management guidelines — 2001. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust 2001; 175: S57-S85. <MJA full text>
- 4. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143-3421.
- 5. Sheridan S, Pignone M, Mulrow C. Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 1039-1052.
- 6. D’Agostino RB Sr, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, et al. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA 2001; 286: 180-187.
- 7. Grundy SM, D’Agostino RB Sr, Mosca L, et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment based on US cohort studies: findings from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop. Circulation 2001; 104: 491-496.
- 8. Hense HW, Schulte H, Lowel H, et al. Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany — results from the MONICA Augsburg and the PROCAM cohorts. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 937-945.
- 9. de Visser CL, Bilo HJ, Thomsen TF, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease: a comparison between the Copenhagen risk score and the Framingham risk score applied to a Dutch population. J Intern Med 2003; 253: 553-562.
- 10. Empana JP, Ducimetiere P, Arveiler D, et al. Are the Framingham and PROCAM coronary heart disease risk functions applicable to different European populations? The PRIME Study. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1903-1911.
- 11. Brindle P, Emberson J, Lampe F, et al. Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327: 1267.
- 12. Marrugat J, D’Agostino R, Sullivan L, et al. An adaptation of the Framingham coronary heart disease risk function to European Mediterranean areas. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 634-638.
- 13. Cappuccio FP, Oakeshott P, Strazzullo P, et al. Application of Framingham risk estimates to ethnic minorities in United Kingdom and implications for primary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cross sectional population based study. BMJ 2002; 325: 1271.
- 14. Jackson R. Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk–benefit prediction guide. BMJ 2000; 320: 709-710.
- 15. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 293-298.
- 16. Knuiman MW, Vu HT. Prediction of coronary heart disease mortality in Busselton, Western Australia: an evaluation of the Framingham, national health epidemiologic follow up study, and WHO ERICA risk scores. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 515-519.
- 17. Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, et al. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991; 83: 356-362.
- 18. Clayton D, Hills M. Statistical models in epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
- 19. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 8.0. College Station, Tex: Stata Corporation, 2003.
- 20. Wang Z, Hoy W. Hypertension, dyslipidaemia, body mass index, diabetes and smoking status in Aboriginal Australians in a remote community. Ethn Dis 2003; 13: 324-330.
- 21. Wang Z, Hoy WE. Association between diabetes and coronary heart disease in Aboriginal people: are women disadvantaged? Med J Aust 2004; 180: 508-511. <MJA full text>
- 22. McDonald S, Maguire G, Duarte N, et al. C-reactive protein, cardiovascular risk, and renal disease in a remote Australian Aboriginal community. Clin Sci (Lond) 2004; 106: 121-128.
- 23. Rowley K, Walker KZ, Cohen J, et al. Inflammation and vascular endothelial activation in an Aboriginal population: relationships to coronary disease risk factors and nutritional markers. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 495-500. <MJA full text>
- 24. Spencer JL, Silva DT, Snelling P, et al. An epidemic of renal failure among Australian Aboriginals. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 537-541. <MJA full text>
- 25. Wachtell K, Ibsen H, Olsen MH, et al. Albuminuria and cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 901-906.
- 26. Olsen MH, Wachtell K, Bella JN, et al. Albuminuria predicts cardiovascular events independently of left ventricular mass in hypertension: a LIFE substudy. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18: 453-459.
- 27. Hoy WE, Wang Z, Van Buynder P, et al. The natural history of renal disease in Australian Aborigines. Part 2. Albuminuria predicts natural death and renal failure. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 249-256.
- 28. Wang Z, Hoy WE. Waist circumference, body mass index, hip circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular disease in Aboriginal people. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004; 58: 888-893.
- 29. Barker DJ, Gluckman PD, Godfrey KM, et al. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 1993; 341: 938-941.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.