Are the Australian guidelines asking too much of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI)?
Authors: Kirsty L Buising, Karin A Thursky, James F Black and Graham V Brown
Published online: 3 May 2004
Kirsty L Buising,* Karin A Thursky,† James F Black,‡ Graham V Brown§
* Clinical Research Fellow, † Infectious Diseases Physician, ‡ Head of Epidemiology, § Head, Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3050. Kirsty.buisingATmh.org.au
To the Editor: The 2003 Australian guidelines on antibiotic therapy suggest that the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) may be used to triage site of care and antibiotic selection for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.1,2 The PSI was developed as a mortality prediction tool, using data from over 14 000 patients with community-acquired pneumonia.3 The antibiotic guidelines suggest specifically that PSI classes I and II represent patients suitable for outpatient therapy, and that class V can identify patients likely to require intensive care and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. We believe this is beyond the previously recommended applications of the PSI and advise caution about its use to identify patients with severe pneumonia.
In the cohort used to validate the PSI, only 32% of patients with severe pneumonia (requiring intensive care) were in class V, indicating that the PSI has poor sensitivity for severe pneumonia.3 This finding has been reflected in other studies.4 The strength of the PSI lies in its ability to identify low-risk patients, as the title of the validating article suggests.3 The PSI is so heavily weighted by age and comorbidities that younger patients needing intensive care are unlikely to accumulate enough points to reach class V. This is important, as early identification of patients with severe pneumonia and initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and intensive-care support improves outcomes.
We are concerned that the PSI may be widely accepted for a purpose for which it was not intended and has not been validated. In underestimating the severity of illness in two-thirds of patients with “severe pneumonia”, the guidelines may provide false reassurance, while clinicians may lose confidence in the PSI if they find it “misses” most patients requiring intensive care.
Current evidence does support use of the PSI to guide decisions about inpatient or outpatient therapy. However, the modified British Thoracic Society (BTS) Severity Score is a simpler, better-validated tool to identify patients with “severe pneumonia” who are likely to need intensive care assessment5 (Box). This tool is useful for junior staff to “flag” patients with potentially severe pneumonia and ensure that they are discussed with a senior clinician. As always, the final management and antibiotic selection should be guided by clinical judgement. We believe that the antibiotic guidelines are valuable to encourage appropriate antibiotic use; our aim is to promote discussion of their content relating to this particular condition.
Suggested alternative approach to assessing patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Step 1: Does the patient need admission to hospital?
Assess with the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI).
Class I or II: consider outpatient management (but also need to consider comorbidities, social supports, likelihood of compliance).
Class III-V: likely to need inpatient management.
Step 2: Does the patient need admission to the intensive care unit?
Assess with the modified British Thoracic Society (BTS) Severity Score.
Class as severe if two or more of the following features are present on initial assessment or within 24 hours of presentation (and are not attributable to another cause):
Confusion (acute onset)
Serum urea level > 7 mmol/L
Respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths/minute
Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≤ 60 mmHg
If severe, discuss the case with a senior clinician and consider intensive-care review and aggressive broad-spectrum antibiotics.
References
- Johnson PDR, Irving LB, Turnidge JD. Community-acquired pneumonia. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 341-347. <eMJA full text>
- Therapeutic Guidelines Limited. Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic. Version 12. Melbourne: TGL, 2003. CHDIJEGE
- Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low risk patients with community acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 243-250. i1083074
- Angus DC, Marrie TJ, Obrosky DS, et al. Severe community acquired pneumonia, use of intensive care services and evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society Diagnostic criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 717-723. i1083076
- British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults. Thorax 2001; 56 Suppl 4: IV1-IV64. i1083078
Hospital-Admitted Injection-Related Infections Among Incarcerated People Who Inject Drugs in Australia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Andrew Palmer, Matthew Carter, Jeremy Yeo, Cecilia Shim, Jason Connor, Jeremy Hayllar, Gerald Holtmann, Naomi Moy, Elliott G. Playford, Naomi Runnegar, Paul J. Clark
The Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Australia: An Additional Tool for Influenza Prevention
Cyra Patel, Alexis Pillsbury, Tran Nguyen, Xia Wang, Helen E. Quinn, Clayton K. Chiu, Allen C. Cheng, Katie L. Flanagan, Zhicheng Wang
Reflex Testing for Hepatitis D Infection: A Unique Opportunity to Reduce Hepatitis D-Related Chronic Liver Disease Deaths in Australia
Jessica Howell, Lauren Andersson, Miriam T. Levy, James O'Beirne, Leon Adams, Katharine Irvine, Avik Majumdar, Golo Ahlenstiel, Kathy Jackson, Krispin Hajkowicz, Joseph Doyle, Jane Davies, Sarah Cherian, Wayne Dimech, Alexander J. Thompson
Localised Herpes Simplex Following Midline Laparotomy
Jessica S. Bulluss, Paul Chee, Matthew J. Verheyden
West Nile virus Kunjin subtype in rural NSW
Emily Gibson, Megan Whitley, Peter Murray, Linda Hueston, Jane Bennett, Raguharan Kathiresu, David N Durrheim
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton