Connect
MJA
MJA

Remoteness of residence and survival from cancer in New South Wales

Katharine E Jong, David P Smith, Xue Q Yu, Dianne L O’Connell, David Goldstein and Bruce K Armstrong
Med J Aust 2004; 180 (12): 618-622.

Summary

Objective: To analyse cancer survival in New South Wales by geographic remoteness.

Design, setting and participants: A survival analysis of all patients with cancers diagnosed in NSW between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 1996. Survival was determined to 31 December 1999.

Main outcome measures: The relative excess risk (RER) of death over 5 years was estimated for each geographic remoteness category relative to the highly accessible category for 20 cancer types adjusted for age, sex, years since diagnosis and, subsequently, stage of cancer at diagnosis.

Results: There were statistically significant differences in the RER of death across remoteness categories (P < 0.001) for cancers of the cervix and prostate and for all cancers. The RERs for the most remote categories (compared with the highly accessible category) before and after adjustment for stage were cervix, 3.22 (95% CI, 1.54–6.75) and 2.25 (95% CI, 1.06–4.77); prostate, 3.38 (95% CI, 2.21–5.16) and 2.53 (95% CI, 1.60–4.01); all cancers, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.20–1.51) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.11–1.41). In addition, there were significant variations in RER of death by remoteness for head and neck, lung and colon cancers and cutaneous melanoma.

Conclusion: Cancer survival varies by remoteness of residence in NSW for all cancers together and some cancers individually. Access to screening or early diagnosis probably contributes to this variation, but persistence after adjustment for stage suggests that treatment variation is also important.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • Katharine E Jong1
  • David P Smith2
  • Xue Q Yu3
  • Dianne L O’Connell4
  • David Goldstein5
  • Bruce K Armstrong6

  • 1 Northern Rivers University Department of Rural Health, University of Sydney, Lismore, NSW.
  • 2 Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, Cancer Council New South Wales, Kings Cross, NSW.
  • 3 Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW.
  • 4 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Correspondence: 

Acknowledgements: 

Bruce Armstrong’s research is supported by a University of Sydney Medical Foundation Program Grant. NSW Health supported this work by way of a research infrastructure grant. The NSW Central Cancer Registry provided data for this analysis. The registry was managed and operated by the Cancer Council NSW when this work was conducted, but is now based at the NSW Cancer Institute.

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Public Health Division. The health of the people of New South Wales. Report of the Chief Health Officer. Sydney: NSW Health, 2000.
  • 2. Glover J, Harris K, Tennant S. A social health atlas of Australia. 2nd ed. Volume 1. Adelaide: Public Health Information Development Unit, University of Adelaide, 1999.
  • 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health in rural and remote Australia. Canberra: AIHW, 1998. (AIHW Cat. No. PHE 6.)
  • 4. Lewis N, Nguyen H, Smith DP, et al. Geographic distribution of cancer in New South Wales in 1991 to 1995 by Local Government Area. Sydney: Cancer Council NSW, 1999.
  • 5. Jong K, Smith DP, Yu XQ, et al. Remoteness and cancer incidence, mortality and survival in New South Wales 1992 to 1996. Cancer Council NSW, 2002.
  • 6. South Australian Cancer Registry. Case survivals by place of residence in Australia. Epidemiology of cancer in South Australia, 1977 to 1998. Adelaide: South Australian Cancer Registry, South Australian Health Commission, 1999: 37-43.
  • 7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and Australasian Association of Cancer Registries. Cancer survival in Australia 1992–1997: geographic categories and socioeconomic status. Canberra: AIHW, 2003. (AIHW cat. no. CAN 17. Cancer Series no. 22.)
  • 8. Liff JM, Chow W-H, Greenberg RS. Rural–urban differences in stage of diagnosis. Cancer 1991; 67: 1454-1459.
  • 9. Launoy G, Le Coutour X, Gignoux M, et al. Influence of rural environment on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of colorectal cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 365-367.
  • 10. Campbell NC, Elliott AM, Sharp L, et al. Rural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancers. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 910-914.
  • 11. Kim YE, Gatrell AC, Francis BJ. The geography of survival after surgery for colorectal cancer in southern England. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 1099-1107.
  • 12. Tracey EA, Supramaniam R, Chen W. Cancer in New South Wales: incidence and mortality 2001. Sydney: Cancer Council NSW, 2003.
  • 13. Department of Health and Aged Care. Accessibility/ Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA). Canberra: The Department, March 1999. (Occasional Papers Series No. 6.)
  • 14. Esteban D, Whelan S, Laudico A, Parkin DM, editors. Manual for cancer registry personnel. IARC Technical Report No. 10. Lyon: IARC, 1995.
  • 15. Voutilainen ET, Dickman PW, Hakulinen T. SURV2: relative survival analysis program. Software manual. Program version 2.02. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Cancer Registry, 2000.
  • 16. Chiang CL. Introduction to stochastic processes in biostatistics. New York: John Wiley, 1968.
  • 17. Ederer F, Heise H. Instructions to IBM 650 programmers in processing survival computations. Methodological note No. 10, End Results Evaluation Section. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute, 1959.
  • 18. Kricker A, Haskill J, Armstrong BK. Breast conservation, mastectomy and axillary surgery in New South Wales women in 1992 and 1995. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 668-673.
  • 19. Nattinger AB, Kneusel RT, Hoffman RG, Gilligan MA. Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 1344-1346.
  • 20. Campbell NC, Elliott AM, Sharp L, et al. Rural factors and survival from cancer: analysis of Scottish cancer registrations. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 1863-1866.
  • 21. Howard GCW, Clarke K, Elia MH, et al. A Scottish national mortality study assessing cause of death, quality of and variation in management of patients with testicular non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours. Br J Cancer 1995; 72: 1307-1311.
  • 22. Twelves CJ, Thomson CS, Dewar JA, Brewster DH on behalf of the Scottish Cancer Therapy Network. Variation in survival of women with breast cancer: Health Board remains a factor at 10 years. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 637-640.
  • 23. Frankel S, Smith GD, Donovan J, Neal D. Screening for prostate cancer. Lancet 2003; 361: 1122-1128.
  • 24. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. BMJ 1986; 293: 659-664.
  • 25. Rae LC. Community screening for colorectal cancer in north-eastern New South Wales, 1987–1996. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 382-385.
  • 26. Bennett CL, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, et al. Relation between literacy, race and stage of presentation among low-income patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3101-3104.
  • 27. Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Mitchell J, et al. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. JAMA 1998; 279: 1801-1807.
  • 28. Condon JR, Armstrong BK, Barnes A, Cunningham J. Cancer in Indigenous Australians: a review. Cancer Causes Control 2003; 14: 109-121.
  • 29. South Australian Cancer Registry. Cancer incidence, mortality and case survival in the South Australian Aboriginal population. Epidemiology of cancer in South Australia, 1977 to 1996. Adelaide: South Australian Cancer Registry, South Australian Health Commission, 1997: 11-19.
  • 30. Margo J, Goldstein D. Report and recommendations from conference: Cancer in the Bush, Optimising Clinical Services (8–9 March 2001). Canberra: Cancer Council Australia and Australian Department of Health and Aged Care, 2001.
  • 31. Kirke K. Living with cancer in Australia. Cancer Forum 2002; 26: 121-122.
  • 32. Olver IN, Selva-Nayagam S. Evaluation of a telemedicine link between Adelaide and Darwin to facilitate cancer management. Telemed J 2000; 6: 213-218.
  • 33. Dewar AM, Steginga SK, Dunn J, et al. Delivering cancer nursing education to regional, rural and remote area nurses in Queensland. Cancer Forum 2001; 27: 27-29.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.