In Victoria, decisions regarding late termination of pregnancy no longer involve just pregnant women and their clinicians. At two major women's hospitals, committees now govern the decision-making process for approval of a late termination of pregnancy. The legal and ethical implications of clinical decision-making by committee need to be widely debated.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Skene L, Nisselle P. Late termination of pregnancy: when is it "lawful"? Med Today 2000; (Sept): 103-106.
- 2. Thornton JG, Lilford RJ. Clinical ethics committee. BMJ 1995; 311: 667-669.
- 3. Rahman A, Katzive L, Henshaw SK. A global review of laws on induced abortion, 1985–1997. Int Fam Plan Perspect 1998; 24: 56-64.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
The author wishes to thank the Royal Women's Hospital administration for documentation relating to the development of the Royal Women's Hospital Termination Review Committee, Dr Paul Shekleton and the Fetal Diagnostic Unit at Monash Medical Centre for outlining the operation of the Monash Termination Review Committee, and Dr Mark Umstad and Dr Miriam O'Connor for assistance in preparing the manuscript.
None identified.