Connect
MJA
MJA

The balancing act: key issues in the lives of women general practitioners in Australia

Margaret R Kilmartin, Christopher J Newell and Martin A Line
Med J Aust 2002; 177 (2): 87-89.

Summary

Objective: To identify key issues affecting women general practitioners in their professional and non-professional lives.

Design: A qualitative study using the Delphi technique, with three rounds of data provision circulated to each participant. Coding was used to ensure anonymity.

Setting and participants: The participants were a purposive sample of 40 women GPs drawn from all Australian States and Territories. The study was conducted between October 1996 and January 1997.

Outcome measures: Key issues affecting the professional and non-professional lives of women GPs.

Results: Some of the key professional issues for women GPs were job satisfaction, balancing work and personal life, autonomy, availability of flexible and part-time work and training, affordability of professional expenses, fair remuneration, and having a voice in decision-making. Key non-professional issues included self-care; time for relationships with a partner, children, family and friends; and time management to allow pursuit of non-medical interests.

Conclusions: The conflicting demands made on women GPs diminish their job satisfaction and lead to stress and imbalance in their lives. Recommendations to ameliorate the problems for women GPs include appropriate training, policy formation, financial and other support, and a change in cultural expectations of women GPs by the community, the profession and governments.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • Margaret R Kilmartin1
  • Christopher J Newell2
  • Martin A Line3

  • University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS.

Correspondence: M.Kilmartin@utas.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

Funding provided by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) for this research is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the reference group and the participant women general practitioners for their input and advice, as well as Edward Rock and Professor Judi Walker for their assistance.

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. The general practice workforce in Australia. Sydney: Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee, 2000. (AMWAC Report No. 2000.2.)
  • 2. Private medical practitioners, Australia, 1994/95. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996. (Catalogue No. 8689.0.)
  • 3. Power P, Aloizos J. The operating environment of general practice. In: General practice in Australia. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care, 2000: 157-195.
  • 4. Medical labour force 1997. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1999. (Catalogue No. HWL 13.)
  • 5. The St Hilda's resolutions: issues, strategies, action plans. In: Jorgensen L, editor. Proceedings from the Inaugural Women in General Practice Conference and workshops: framing a national strategy. The St Hilda's resolutions. Melbourne: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, 2000: 81-92.
  • 6. McEwin K. NSW Rural Doctors Network discussion paper. Wanted: new rural workforce strategies for female doctors. Findings from a survey of women in rural medicine. Sydney: NSW Rural Doctors Network, 2001.
  • 7. Wainer J. Female rural doctors in Victoria. "It's where we live". Melbourne: Rural Workforce Agency, Victoria, 2001.
  • 8. Tolhurst H, Lippert N. The National Female Rural General Practitioners Research Project. Final report. Canberra: General Practice Partnership Advisory Council, 2001.
  • 9. Ellis R, Wittington D. Quality assurance in health care: a handbook. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1993.
  • 10. Broomfield D, Humphris GM. Using the Delphi technique to identify the cancer education requirements of general practitioners. Med Educ 2001; 35: 928-937.
  • 11. Tolhurst H, Bell P, Baker L, et al. Educational and support needs of female rural general practitioners. Bathurst: School of Nursing and Health Administration, Charles Sturt University, 1997.
  • 12. Britt H, Bhasale A, Miles D, et al. The sex of the general practitioner. A comparison of characteristics, patients, and medical conditions managed. Med Care 1996; 34: 403-415.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.