Reclaiming the lost meanings of medicine

Zeev E Neuwirth
Med J Aust 2002; 176 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04291.x
Published online: 21 January 2002

For some time, I have taught communication and relational skills to medical students and physicians-in-training in an internal medicine residency program in the United States. What became apparent to me early on was that the humanistic, relationship-centred attitudes and behaviours being fostered in the classroom were not always finding their way into the clinic or onto the hospital floors. Sadly enough, this observation is supported by studies on patient–physician communication.1,2 In discussing this phenomenon with my students and colleagues, a common response emerged. They believe the relational behaviours taught in the classroom are not wholly credible in the “real world” of medical practice. Empathic attitudes and behaviours make little sense in terms of survival in residency training or success in practice. It seems as if these compassionate behaviours are being extinguished by a lack of incentive or reward in the system. Valued and rewarded instead are academic acumen, technical knowledge and skill, business savvy, and financial success.

  • Department of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY.


  • 1. Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved? JAMA 1999; 281: 283-287.
  • 2. Suchman T, Markakis K, Beckman HB, Frankel R. A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. JAMA 1997; 277: 678-682.
  • 3. Branch W. The ethics of caring and medical education. Acad Med 2000; 75: 127-132.
  • 4. Carmel S, Glick SM. Compassionate-empathic physicians: personality traits and social-organizational factors that enhance or inhibit this behavior pattern. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1253-1261.
  • 5. Eiser AR, Goold SD, Suchman AL. The role of bioethics and business ethics. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14 Suppl: S58-S62.
  • 6. Herzlinger R. Market-driven health care. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1997.
  • 7. Postman N. Building a bridge to the 18th century: how the past can improve our future. New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1999: 82-98.
  • 8. Postman N. Technopology — the surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books, 1992: 92-106.
  • 9. Scheitel SM, Boland BJ, Wollan PC, Silverstein MD. Patient–physician agreement about medical diagnoses and cardiovascular risk factors in the ambulatory general medical examination. Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71: 1131-1137.
  • 10. Taking pulse of profession, public. American Medical News 1997; 40(38): 11-12.
  • 11. Lipsyte, R. It's enough to make you sick the way patients get treated. The New York Times 1998; Jun 21.
  • 12. Epstein RH. Major medical mystery — why people avoid doctors. The New York Times 2000; Oct 31.
  • 13. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA 1998; 279: 1548-1553.
  • 14. McCue JD. The effects of stress on physicians and their medical practice. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 458-463.
  • 15. Schroeder SA. The troubled profession: is medicine's glass half full or half empty? Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 583-592.
  • 16. Barnard A, Tong K. The doctor is out. The Boston Globe 2000 July 16.
  • 17. Kassirer JP. Doctor discontent. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1543-1545.
  • 18. Shaywitz D, Ausiello D. The demise of reflective doctoring. The New York Times 2000; Jun 9.
  • 19. Barsky A. The paradox of health. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 414-418.
  • 20. Eisenberg L. Good technical outcome, poor service experience: a verdict on contemporary medical care? JAMA 2001; 285: 2639-2641.
  • 21. Frankl VE. The doctor and the soul. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Press, 1995: 105-131.
  • 22. Peabody FW. The care of the patient. JAMA 1927; 88: 877-882.
  • 23. Cassell EJ. Diagnosing suffering: a perspective. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 531-534.
  • 24. Broyard A. Doctor, talk to me. Minn Med 1998; 81: 8-11, 50.
  • 25. Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, et al. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract 1998; 47: 213-220.
  • 26. Crawshaw R, Rogers DE, Pellegrino ED, et al. Patient physician covenant. JAMA 1995; 273: 1553.
  • 27. Firth-Cozens J, Greenhalgh J. Doctors' perceptions of the links between stress and lowered clinical care. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 1017-1022.
  • 28. Quill TE, Williamson P. Healthy approaches to physician stress. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 1857-1861.
  • 29. Davidoff F. Changing the subject: ethical principles for everyone in health care. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 386-389.
  • 30. Emanuel EJ. Medical ethics in the era of managed care: the need for institutional structures instead of principles for individual cases. J Clin Ethics 1995; 6: 335-338.
  • 31. Wynia MK, Latham SR, Kao AC, et al. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1612-1616.
  • 32. Rothman DR. Medical professionalism — focusing on the real issues. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1284-1286.
  • 33. US Institute of Medicine. Board on Health Care Services. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academies of Science, 2001. Available at: (accessed December 2001).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.