|
Personal Perspective
Depression: dispirited or spiritually deprived?
Craig S Hassed
MJA 2000; 173: 545-547
The 20th century has seen a widespread decline in mental health in
Western society. One important factor may be the lack of meaning and
spiritual fulfilment that is part of our increasingly secular and
materialistic society. In medical education and practice,
religious issues are often marginalised or "pathologised", despite
consistent evidence from the literature of the protective effect of
"religiosity" or "spirituality" on mental and physical health.
→ Other articles have cited this article
Spirituality and religiosity -
Spirituality and mental health -
Relevance to clinical medicine -
References -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on General practice and primary care
| |
The increasing incidence of mental illness, especially depression,
in the 20th century1,2 probably
reflects both increased recognition and an absolute rise in
prevalence. World Health Organization figures released in 1996
revealed that depression was expected to be a leading contributor to
the burden of disease in the 21st century.1 Recent figures suggesting
that depression is the most important component of the disability
burden in Australia would tend to support that
prediction.3 Approximately 20% of adults
are expected to have a major depressive episode at some time in their
lives, and 16% of people aged over 65 years have persistent
symptoms.4 Stress levels, whether real
or perceived, among people living a "Western" lifestyle have risen by
approximately 45% over the past 30 years.5 Youth suicide rates are
particularly alarming,2 and one Australian study
revealed that 20% of 15-24-year-olds had contemplated suicide in the
preceding fortnight.6 In keeping with our
predominant "illness model" we are more often concerned with risk
factors for depression, youth suicide, substance misuse and
violence than the less-publicised protective factors, which
include "connectedness" and "spirituality".7
|
| |
The terms used most commonly in the medical literature are "religious
commitment" or "religiosity", referring to the "participation in or
endorsement of practices, beliefs, attitudes, or sentiments that
are associated with an organised community of faith".8 One can be
"extrinsically religious" in adopting the trappings, religious
behaviours and attitudes, but if one holds a strong inner belief then
one is "intrinsically religious".
"Spirituality" generally refers to concepts that are much harder to
define and measure, such as "personal views and behaviours that
express a sense of relatedness to the transcendental dimension or to
something greater than the self".9 Spirituality can encompass
belief in a higher being, the search for meaning, and a sense of
purpose and connectedness. Obviously, there can be a wide overlap
between religiosity and spirituality.
|
| |
For many years science and ethics have tended to become increasingly
secular, thus neglecting or "pathologising" spiritual issues.
Sigmund Freud, for example, saw religion as "a universal obsessional
neurosis", and described the mystical experience of unity as a
"regression to primary narcissism".10 Carl Jung, on the other
hand, saw the search for spiritual enlightenment as the central, but
often ignored, core of human experience. He described the lack of
meaning in life as a "soul-sickness" whose full import our age had not
yet begun to comprehend.
This was one of the main reasons why these two pioneers of psychology
parted company. The observation that Freudian psychoanalysis is
probably associated with negative effects on people's health may,
however, throw into question Freud's understanding of human
nature.11 Nevertheless, many of
Freud's attitudes have deeply etched their way into psychiatric
theory and practice:
Mainstream psychiatry, in its
theory, research and practice, as well as its diagnostic
classification system, has tended to either ignore or pathologise
the religious and spiritual issues that clients bring into
treatment.12
The negative attitude towards religiosity in many quarters of
contemporary medicine and psychiatry is out of keeping with the
weight of evidence which clearly shows that it has a beneficial effect
on mental and physical health.8 The findings are consistent
across prospective and retrospective studies, whether or not they
control for other lifestyle and socioeconomic factors, and whether
they examine prevention of illness, coping with illness, or recovery
(see Box).
Many studies have linked a lack of religiosity to depression.
Religious commitment is associated with a reduced incidence of
depression13 and a quicker recovery
from depressive illness for the elderly.15 Two separate reviews of
the literature have supported this: those with high levels of
"religious involvement", "religious salience" and "intrinsic
religious motivation" were at reduced risk,14 and religious commitment
was inversely related to suicide risk in 13 of 16 studies
reviewed.13 One study showed a
fourfold increased risk of suicide for non-churchgoers compared
with regular attenders,22 and no study has shown an
increased risk of suicide among churchgoers.
Other data suggest that religiosity protects against drug and
alcohol misuse, one of the most commonly used and maladaptive ways for
dealing with depression. One study showed that 89% of alcoholics (but
only 20% of the control group) had lost interest in religious issues
during their teenage years.20 In another study it was
found that doctors (who are a high-risk group for substance misuse)
were less likely to develop an alcohol problem in later life if they had
had a religious commitment while in medical school.21 Religious
affiliation, even if accompanied by alcohol misuse, seemed to
protect against heavy use or the associated extreme clinical and
social consequences.
The reasons why people with a sense of religious commitment are less
likely to become depressed may include a feeling of social
connectedness, exposure to messages about healthy living, or
perhaps the reduced exposure to drug-taking behaviour. However,
studies controlling for these factors have still found religiosity
to be independently protective. So there may be other reasons, such as
the comfort that comes from believing in a benevolent and caring God,
the view that justice always prevails in the end, or that adverse
events always have a meaning and a message. Such attitudes would
buffer enormously against the ill-effects of life stresses and the
depression that often follows.
The important role that mental health plays in the development and
progression of physical illness goes part way to explaining why
religious commitment is associated with reduced risk of conditions
such as hypertension, heart disease and cancer.26,27,29,30 A
population study over nine years showed that all-cause mortality was
significantly reduced and life expectancy increased (to 82 years v.
75 years) for regular churchgoers. The findings were not explainable
by the accepted lifestyle and social variables,24 and were
consistent with other data.25
Unfortunately, examples of the negative effects of religion are
generally more newsworthy in the medical and general press than the
positive ones. For example, in a review of a series of preventable
paediatric deaths, it was found that some parents' religious views
played an important part in delaying the seeking of medical
care.31
Sometimes this negative press is for a
good reason, but this is not an argument against spirituality, but
rather against blind faith unsupported by reason.
|
| |
The rise in mental illness seems paradoxical in view of our
unprecedented levels of physical health, relative affluence,
technological advancement and social freedom. Also paradoxical is
the fact that suicide rates generally fall in times of adversity, such
as during major wars.2 Although one doesn't
generally court adversity, it can teach us something about ourselves
if we pay attention to the lesson. As William Shakespeare so
aptly put it:
This is no flattery: these are
counsellors
That feelingly persuade me what I am.
Sweet are the uses of adversity,
Which, like the toad, ugly and venomous,
Wears yet a precious jewel in his head.
(As You Like It; Act 2, Scene 1)
Gauging a patient's spiritual awareness, at very least, should form
an important part of a thorough history. One can not really be
said to know another person without an understanding of his or her
responses to the most important questions that human beings ask
themselves. Without this knowledge, treatment of especially
sensitive conditions like depression or terminal illness will take
place in the dark. Broaching philosophical and spiritual issues
requires considerable sensitivity, cultural tolerance and the
ability to be non-dogmatic. When done effectively, it can facilitate
counselling and psychotherapy enormously,32 but each doctor and
patient needs to explore these issues in his or her own way.
Even if we are not religious ourselves, we should invite discussion in
a respectful way, taking care not to push a line of thought, whether it
be religious or secular. Religious sensitivities and biases, like
political ones, can make discussion divisive and difficult. More
in-depth questions about spirituality and religion should probably
be referred to culturally appropriate "non-medical experts".
At present, despite the large body of evidence on the connection
between religiosity and health, little if any reference is made to
this issue in medical education and practice. If a physical factor was
found to be of as much importance to health it would certainly not be
ignored, but then science is always most comfortable with what it can
most easily measure. It is reasonable for medical students and
practitioners to be aware of this field of evidence so that they can
provide a more holistic approach to information giving,
psychotherapy and treatment. Unfortunately, a perceived lack of
holism is a central reason why many people look outside the biomedical
model for their healthcare.33
For many people, especially the young, the search for meaning is
becoming a rarer pursuit in the bustle of modern material life. People
pursue meaning and fulfilment by as many paths as there are people, but
perhaps we often search in places which can not provide it. If the
search is misdirected, disappointment, stress, depression and
social conflict may be inevitable sequelae of such existential pain.
Perhaps these issues will become increasingly relevant for future
generations, for whom the lack of meaning will come at an increasing
cost. Maybe a balanced form of spirituality which is not
scientifically naive nor culturally intolerant may be a
prerequisite for the mental and material wellbeing of an all too often
dispirited community and healing profession.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is
blind" (Albert Einstein).34
|
|
| |
- Murray C, Lopez A. The global burden of disease. Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard School of Public Health, on behalf of the
World Health Organization and the World Bank, 1996.
-
Cantor C, Neulinger K, De Leo D. Australian suicide trends
1964-1997: youth and beyond? Med J Aust 1999; 171: 137-141.
-
Mathers CD, Vos ET, Stevenson CE, Begg SJ. The Australian Burden of
Disease Study: measuring the loss of health from diseases, injuries
and risk factors. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 592-596.
-
Rey J. The Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) study:
implications for Australia. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 200-203.
-
Miller M, Rahe R. Life changes scaling for the 1990s. J Psychosom
Res 1997; 43: 279-292.
-
McKelvey R, Davies L, Pfaff J, et al. Psychological distress and
suicidal ideation among 15-24 year olds presenting to a general
practice: a pilot study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1998; 32:
344-348.
-
Resnick M, Bearman P, Blum R, et al. Protecting adolescents from
harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent
Health. JAMA 1997; 278: 823-832.
-
Matthews D, McCullough M, Larson D, et al. Religious commitment and
health status: a review of the research and implications for family
medicine. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 118-124.
-
Reed P. Spirituality and wellbeing in terminally ill hospitalised
patients. Res Nurs Health 1987; 9: 35-41.
-
Freud S. Civilisation and its discontents. In: Strachey J,
editor. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of
Sigmund Freud. Vol. 20. London: Hogarth, 1959.
-
Grossarth-Maticek R, Eysenck H. Prophylactic effects of
psychoanalysis on cancer-prone and coronary heart disease-prone
probands, as compared with control groups and behaviour therapy
groups. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1990; 21: 91-99.
-
Lukoff D, Fu FG, Turner R. Cultural considerations in the
assessment and treatment of religious and spiritual problems.
Psychiatr Clin North Am 1995; 18(3): 467-485.
-
Gartner J, Larson D, Allen G. Religious commitment and mental
health: a review of the empirical literature. J Psychol Theol
1991; 19: 6-25.
-
McCullough M, Larson D. Religion and depression: a review of the
literature. Twin Research 1999; 2(2): 126-136.
-
Koenig H, George L, Peterson B. Religiosity and remission of
depression in medically ill older patients. Am J Psychiatry
1998; 155: 536-542.
-
Oxman T, Freeman D, Manheimer E. Lack of social participation or
religious strength and comfort as risk factors for death after
cardiac surgery in the elderly. Psychosom Med 1995; 57: 5-15.
-
Saudia TL, Kinney MR, Brown KC, et al. Health locus of control and
helpfulness of prayer. Heart Lung 1991; 20: 60-66.
-
Koenig H, Cohen H, Blazer D, et al. Religious coping and depression
in elderly, hospitalised medically-ill men. Am J Psychiatry
1992; 149: 1693-1700.
-
Williams D, Larson D, Buckler R, et al. Religion and psychological
distress in a community sample. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32:
1257-1262.
-
Larson D, Wilson W. The religious life of alcoholics. South Med
J 1980; 73: 723-727.
-
Moore R, Mead L, Pearson T. Youthful precursors of alcohol abuse in
physicians. Am J Med 1990; 88: 332-336.
-
Comstock G, Partridge K. Church attendance and health. J
Chronic Dis 1972; 25: 665-672.
-
Propst LR, Ostrom R, Watkins P, et al. Comparative efficacy of
religious and nonreligious cognitive-behavioral therapy for the
treatment of clinical depression in religious individuals. J
Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60: 94-103.
-
Hummer R, Rogers R, Nam C, et al. Religious involvement and U.S.
adult mortality. Demography 1999; 36: 273-285.
-
Clark K, Friedman H, Martin L. A longitudinal study of religiosity
and mortality risk. Journal of Health Psychology 1999; 4:
381-391.
-
Fraser G, Sharlik D. Risk factors for all-cause and coronary heart
disease mortality in the oldest old: the Adventist Health Study.
Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2249-2258.
-
Kune G, Kune S, Watson L. Perceived religiousness is protective
for colorectal cancer: data from the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer
Study. J R Soc Med 1993; 86: 645-647.
-
Larson DB, Koenig HG, Kaplan BH, et al. The impact of religion on
men's blood pressure. J Religion Health 1989; 28: 265-278.
-
Levin J, Vanderpool H. Is frequent religious attendance really
conducive to better health? Toward an epidemiology of religion.
Soc Sci Med 1987; 24: 589-600.
-
Craigie F, Larson D, Liu I. References to religion in the Journal of
Family Practice: dimensions and valency of spirituality. J Fam
Pract 1990; 30: 477-480.
-
Asser S, Swan R. Child fatalities from religion motivated medical
neglect. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 625-629.
-
Hassed C. Western psychology meets Eastern philosophy. Aust
Fam Physician 1999; 28: 1057-1058.
-
Astin J. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a
national study. JAMA 1998; 279: 1548-1553.
-
Einstein A. Out of my later years. New York: Philosophical
Library, 1950.
|
| |
Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Monash
University
Craig S Hassed, MB BS, FRACGP, Senior Lecturer.
Reprints will not be available from the author. Correspondence: Dr C S
Hassed, Department of Community Medicine and General Practice,
Monash University, 867 Centre Road, East Bentleigh, VIC 3165.
craig.hassedATmed.monash.edu.au
©MJA 2000
Make a
comment
Other articles have cited this article:
Russell D'Souza. The importance of spirituality in medicine and
its application to clinical practice Med J Aust 2007; 186 (10 Suppl): S57-S59. [Spirituality and Health] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/186_10_210507/dso11102_fm.html>
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2000 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|
|
|
Apparent relationships between religiosity and health*
Mental health
Reduced incidence of depression7,8,13,14
Quicker recovery from depression15
Better recovery from major surgery,16with less
depression17
Improved coping with disability,18 illness and
stress19
Reduced substance misuse, including misuse of alcohol and illicit drugs20,21
Reduced suicide risk in adolescents22
Facilitation of psychotherapy23
Improved coping with serious illness8
Physical health
Reduced all-cause mortality24,25
Greater longevity24,25
Reduced incidence of heart disease and hypertension26
Improved recovery from cardiac surgery16
Reduced incidence of and longer survival with cancer27
Modification of physical risk-factors with associated reductions in lifestyle-related
illnesses such as emphysema and cirrhosis22,28
* Causal relationships between religiosity and health are
sometimes hard to define, although many studies control for other known
physical and socioeconomic risk factors. Refining methodology and further
research are required to more fully elucidate the relationship. |
|
| Back to text |
|