Click Here!

  eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Personal Perspective

Depression: dispirited or spiritually deprived?

Craig S Hassed

MJA 2000; 173: 545-547

The 20th century has seen a widespread decline in mental health in Western society. One important factor may be the lack of meaning and spiritual fulfilment that is part of our increasingly secular and materialistic society. In medical education and practice, religious issues are often marginalised or "pathologised", despite consistent evidence from the literature of the protective effect of "religiosity" or "spirituality" on mental and physical health.

Spirituality and religiosity - Spirituality and mental health - Relevance to clinical medicine - References - Authors' details
Make a comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail - Current contents list - More articles on General practice and primary care


  The increasing incidence of mental illness, especially depression, in the 20th century1,2 probably reflects both increased recognition and an absolute rise in prevalence. World Health Organization figures released in 1996 revealed that depression was expected to be a leading contributor to the burden of disease in the 21st century.1 Recent figures suggesting that depression is the most important component of the disability burden in Australia would tend to support that prediction.3 Approximately 20% of adults are expected to have a major depressive episode at some time in their lives, and 16% of people aged over 65 years have persistent symptoms.4 Stress levels, whether real or perceived, among people living a "Western" lifestyle have risen by approximately 45% over the past 30 years.5 Youth suicide rates are particularly alarming,2 and one Australian study revealed that 20% of 15-24-year-olds had contemplated suicide in the preceding fortnight.6 In keeping with our predominant "illness model" we are more often concerned with risk factors for depression, youth suicide, substance misuse and violence than the less-publicised protective factors, which include "connectedness" and "spirituality".7



Spirituality and religiosity

The terms used most commonly in the medical literature are "religious commitment" or "religiosity", referring to the "participation in or endorsement of practices, beliefs, attitudes, or sentiments that are associated with an organised community of faith".8 One can be "extrinsically religious" in adopting the trappings, religious behaviours and attitudes, but if one holds a strong inner belief then one is "intrinsically religious".

"Spirituality" generally refers to concepts that are much harder to define and measure, such as "personal views and behaviours that express a sense of relatedness to the transcendental dimension or to something greater than the self".9 Spirituality can encompass belief in a higher being, the search for meaning, and a sense of purpose and connectedness. Obviously, there can be a wide overlap between religiosity and spirituality.



Spirituality and mental health

For many years science and ethics have tended to become increasingly secular, thus neglecting or "pathologising" spiritual issues. Sigmund Freud, for example, saw religion as "a universal obsessional neurosis", and described the mystical experience of unity as a "regression to primary narcissism".10 Carl Jung, on the other hand, saw the search for spiritual enlightenment as the central, but often ignored, core of human experience. He described the lack of meaning in life as a "soul-sickness" whose full import our age had not yet begun to comprehend.

This was one of the main reasons why these two pioneers of psychology parted company. The observation that Freudian psychoanalysis is probably associated with negative effects on people's health may, however, throw into question Freud's understanding of human nature.11 Nevertheless, many of Freud's attitudes have deeply etched their way into psychiatric theory and practice:

Mainstream psychiatry, in its theory, research and practice, as well as its diagnostic classification system, has tended to either ignore or pathologise the religious and spiritual issues that clients bring into treatment.12

The negative attitude towards religiosity in many quarters of contemporary medicine and psychiatry is out of keeping with the weight of evidence which clearly shows that it has a beneficial effect on mental and physical health.8 The findings are consistent across prospective and retrospective studies, whether or not they control for other lifestyle and socioeconomic factors, and whether they examine prevention of illness, coping with illness, or recovery (see Box).

Many studies have linked a lack of religiosity to depression. Religious commitment is associated with a reduced incidence of depression13 and a quicker recovery from depressive illness for the elderly.15 Two separate reviews of the literature have supported this: those with high levels of "religious involvement", "religious salience" and "intrinsic religious motivation" were at reduced risk,14 and religious commitment was inversely related to suicide risk in 13 of 16 studies reviewed.13 One study showed a fourfold increased risk of suicide for non-churchgoers compared with regular attenders,22 and no study has shown an increased risk of suicide among churchgoers.

Other data suggest that religiosity protects against drug and alcohol misuse, one of the most commonly used and maladaptive ways for dealing with depression. One study showed that 89% of alcoholics (but only 20% of the control group) had lost interest in religious issues during their teenage years.20 In another study it was found that doctors (who are a high-risk group for substance misuse) were less likely to develop an alcohol problem in later life if they had had a religious commitment while in medical school.21 Religious affiliation, even if accompanied by alcohol misuse, seemed to protect against heavy use or the associated extreme clinical and social consequences.

The reasons why people with a sense of religious commitment are less likely to become depressed may include a feeling of social connectedness, exposure to messages about healthy living, or perhaps the reduced exposure to drug-taking behaviour. However, studies controlling for these factors have still found religiosity to be independently protective. So there may be other reasons, such as the comfort that comes from believing in a benevolent and caring God, the view that justice always prevails in the end, or that adverse events always have a meaning and a message. Such attitudes would buffer enormously against the ill-effects of life stresses and the depression that often follows.

The important role that mental health plays in the development and progression of physical illness goes part way to explaining why religious commitment is associated with reduced risk of conditions such as hypertension, heart disease and cancer.26,27,29,30 A population study over nine years showed that all-cause mortality was significantly reduced and life expectancy increased (to 82 years v. 75 years) for regular churchgoers. The findings were not explainable by the accepted lifestyle and social variables,24 and were consistent with other data.25

Unfortunately, examples of the negative effects of religion are generally more newsworthy in the medical and general press than the positive ones. For example, in a review of a series of preventable paediatric deaths, it was found that some parents' religious views played an important part in delaying the seeking of medical care.31 Sometimes this negative press is for a good reason, but this is not an argument against spirituality, but rather against blind faith unsupported by reason.



Relevance to clinical medicine

The rise in mental illness seems paradoxical in view of our unprecedented levels of physical health, relative affluence, technological advancement and social freedom. Also paradoxical is the fact that suicide rates generally fall in times of adversity, such as during major wars.2 Although one doesn't generally court adversity, it can teach us something about ourselves if we pay attention to the lesson. As William Shakespeare so aptly put it:
This is no flattery: these are counsellors
That feelingly persuade me what I am.
Sweet are the uses of adversity,
Which, like the toad, ugly and venomous,
Wears yet a precious jewel in his head.
(As You Like It; Act 2, Scene 1)

Gauging a patient's spiritual awareness, at very least, should form an important part of a thorough history. One can not really be said to know another person without an understanding of his or her responses to the most important questions that human beings ask themselves. Without this knowledge, treatment of especially sensitive conditions like depression or terminal illness will take place in the dark. Broaching philosophical and spiritual issues requires considerable sensitivity, cultural tolerance and the ability to be non-dogmatic. When done effectively, it can facilitate counselling and psychotherapy enormously,32 but each doctor and patient needs to explore these issues in his or her own way. Even if we are not religious ourselves, we should invite discussion in a respectful way, taking care not to push a line of thought, whether it be religious or secular. Religious sensitivities and biases, like political ones, can make discussion divisive and difficult. More in-depth questions about spirituality and religion should probably be referred to culturally appropriate "non-medical experts".

At present, despite the large body of evidence on the connection between religiosity and health, little if any reference is made to this issue in medical education and practice. If a physical factor was found to be of as much importance to health it would certainly not be ignored, but then science is always most comfortable with what it can most easily measure. It is reasonable for medical students and practitioners to be aware of this field of evidence so that they can provide a more holistic approach to information giving, psychotherapy and treatment. Unfortunately, a perceived lack of holism is a central reason why many people look outside the biomedical model for their healthcare.33

For many people, especially the young, the search for meaning is becoming a rarer pursuit in the bustle of modern material life. People pursue meaning and fulfilment by as many paths as there are people, but perhaps we often search in places which can not provide it. If the search is misdirected, disappointment, stress, depression and social conflict may be inevitable sequelae of such existential pain. Perhaps these issues will become increasingly relevant for future generations, for whom the lack of meaning will come at an increasing cost. Maybe a balanced form of spirituality which is not scientifically naive nor culturally intolerant may be a prerequisite for the mental and material wellbeing of an all too often dispirited community and healing profession.

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" (Albert Einstein).34

 


References

  1. Murray C, Lopez A. The global burden of disease. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard School of Public Health, on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank, 1996.
  2. Cantor C, Neulinger K, De Leo D. Australian suicide trends 1964-1997: youth and beyond? Med J Aust 1999; 171: 137-141.
  3. Mathers CD, Vos ET, Stevenson CE, Begg SJ. The Australian Burden of Disease Study: measuring the loss of health from diseases, injuries and risk factors. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 592-596.
  4. Rey J. The Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) study: implications for Australia. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 200-203.
  5. Miller M, Rahe R. Life changes scaling for the 1990s. J Psychosom Res 1997; 43: 279-292.
  6. McKelvey R, Davies L, Pfaff J, et al. Psychological distress and suicidal ideation among 15-24 year olds presenting to a general practice: a pilot study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1998; 32: 344-348.
  7. Resnick M, Bearman P, Blum R, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA 1997; 278: 823-832.
  8. Matthews D, McCullough M, Larson D, et al. Religious commitment and health status: a review of the research and implications for family medicine. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 118-124.
  9. Reed P. Spirituality and wellbeing in terminally ill hospitalised patients. Res Nurs Health 1987; 9: 35-41.
  10. Freud S. Civilisation and its discontents. In: Strachey J, editor. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 20. London: Hogarth, 1959.
  11. Grossarth-Maticek R, Eysenck H. Prophylactic effects of psychoanalysis on cancer-prone and coronary heart disease-prone probands, as compared with control groups and behaviour therapy groups. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1990; 21: 91-99.
  12. Lukoff D, Fu FG, Turner R. Cultural considerations in the assessment and treatment of religious and spiritual problems. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1995; 18(3): 467-485.
  13. Gartner J, Larson D, Allen G. Religious commitment and mental health: a review of the empirical literature. J Psychol Theol 1991; 19: 6-25.
  14. McCullough M, Larson D. Religion and depression: a review of the literature. Twin Research 1999; 2(2): 126-136.
  15. Koenig H, George L, Peterson B. Religiosity and remission of depression in medically ill older patients. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 536-542.
  16. Oxman T, Freeman D, Manheimer E. Lack of social participation or religious strength and comfort as risk factors for death after cardiac surgery in the elderly. Psychosom Med 1995; 57: 5-15.
  17. Saudia TL, Kinney MR, Brown KC, et al. Health locus of control and helpfulness of prayer. Heart Lung 1991; 20: 60-66.
  18. Koenig H, Cohen H, Blazer D, et al. Religious coping and depression in elderly, hospitalised medically-ill men. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149: 1693-1700.
  19. Williams D, Larson D, Buckler R, et al. Religion and psychological distress in a community sample. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 1257-1262.
  20. Larson D, Wilson W. The religious life of alcoholics. South Med J 1980; 73: 723-727.
  21. Moore R, Mead L, Pearson T. Youthful precursors of alcohol abuse in physicians. Am J Med 1990; 88: 332-336.
  22. Comstock G, Partridge K. Church attendance and health. J Chronic Dis 1972; 25: 665-672.
  23. Propst LR, Ostrom R, Watkins P, et al. Comparative efficacy of religious and nonreligious cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of clinical depression in religious individuals. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60: 94-103.
  24. Hummer R, Rogers R, Nam C, et al. Religious involvement and U.S. adult mortality. Demography 1999; 36: 273-285.
  25. Clark K, Friedman H, Martin L. A longitudinal study of religiosity and mortality risk. Journal of Health Psychology 1999; 4: 381-391.
  26. Fraser G, Sharlik D. Risk factors for all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality in the oldest old: the Adventist Health Study. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2249-2258.
  27. Kune G, Kune S, Watson L. Perceived religiousness is protective for colorectal cancer: data from the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study. J R Soc Med 1993; 86: 645-647.
  28. Larson DB, Koenig HG, Kaplan BH, et al. The impact of religion on men's blood pressure. J Religion Health 1989; 28: 265-278.
  29. Levin J, Vanderpool H. Is frequent religious attendance really conducive to better health? Toward an epidemiology of religion. Soc Sci Med 1987; 24: 589-600.
  30. Craigie F, Larson D, Liu I. References to religion in the Journal of Family Practice: dimensions and valency of spirituality. J Fam Pract 1990; 30: 477-480.
  31. Asser S, Swan R. Child fatalities from religion motivated medical neglect. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 625-629.
  32. Hassed C. Western psychology meets Eastern philosophy. Aust Fam Physician 1999; 28: 1057-1058.
  33. Astin J. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA 1998; 279: 1548-1553.
  34. Einstein A. Out of my later years. New York: Philosophical Library, 1950.



Authors' details

Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Monash University
Craig S Hassed, MB BS, FRACGP, Senior Lecturer.

Reprints will not be available from the author.
Correspondence: Dr C S Hassed, Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Monash University, 867 Centre Road, East Bentleigh, VIC 3165.
craig.hassedATmed.monash.edu.au

©MJA 2000
Make a comment

Other articles have cited this article:

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  


Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further reproduction or distribution of the articles should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For permission, contact the Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".

<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/> © 2000 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate your comments.

Apparent relationships between religiosity and health*

Mental health
Reduced incidence of depression7,8,13,14
Quicker recovery from depression15
Better recovery from major surgery,16with less depression17
Improved coping with disability,18 illness and stress19
Reduced substance misuse, including misuse of alcohol and illicit drugs20,21
Reduced suicide risk in adolescents22
Facilitation of psychotherapy23
Improved coping with serious illness8

Physical health
Reduced all-cause mortality24,25
Greater longevity24,25
Reduced incidence of heart disease and hypertension26
Improved recovery from cardiac surgery16
Reduced incidence of and longer survival with cancer27
Modification of physical risk-factors with associated reductions in lifestyle-related illnesses such as emphysema and cirrhosis22,28


* Causal relationships between religiosity and health are sometimes hard to define, although many studies control for other known physical and socioeconomic risk factors. Refining methodology and further research are required to more fully elucidate the relationship.
Back to text