Connect
MJA
MJA

The difficult problem: assessing medical students’ professional attitudes and behaviour

Malcolm H Parker, Jane Turner, Paul McGurgan, Lynne M Emmerton, Lindy L McAllister and David Wilkinson
Med J Aust 2010; 193 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb04097.x
Published online: 6 December 2010

This report summarises the presentations, discussion themes and outcomes of the National Forum: Assessment of Professional Behaviour of Medical Students held in Brisbane on 5 March 2010

The behaviour of doctors and medical students has received increasing attention in recent years, but its assessment has resisted straightforward integration into academic programs. Attempts to prevent the admission of the small number of students who are unsuitable for graduation and subsequent practice are yet to prove effective.1,2 National registration will require that virtually all Australian health professional students are registered with their respective national body;3-5 these students will therefore formally become members of their professions. The accountability thereby imposed on students and their schools will set new expectations for managing student behaviour in universities.


  • 1 University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 2 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA.


Correspondence: m.parker@uq.edu.au

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Parker MH, Wilkinson D. Dealing with “rogue” medical students: we need a nationally consistent approach based on “case law”. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 626-628. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Wilkinson D, Zhang J, Byrne GJ, et al. Medical school selection criteria and the prediction of academic performance. Evidence leading to change in policy and practice at the University of Queensland. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 349-354. <MJA full text>
  • 3. Australia’s Health Workforce Online. National Registration and Accreditation Scheme. http://www.nhwt.gov.au/natreg.asp (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 4. Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency [website]. http://www.ahpra.gov.au (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 5. Medical Board of Australia [website]. http://www.medicalboard.gov.au (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 6. Health Quality and Complaints Commission [website]. http://www.hqcc. qld.gov.au (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 7. Australian Medical Council. Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia. http://www.ahpra.gov.au/Health-Professions/Medical/Codes-and-Guidelines.aspx (accessed Nov 2010).
  • 8. Australian Medical Council. Assessment and accreditation of medical schools: standards and procedures, 2009. http://www.amc.org.au/images/Medschool/standards.pdf (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 9. Papadakis MA, Osborn EHS, Cooke M, Healy K. A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Clinical Clerkships Operation Committee. Acad Med 1999; 74: 980-990.
  • 10. Papadakis M, Loeser H, Healy K. Early detection and evaluation of professionalism deficiencies in medical students: one school’s approach. Acad Med 2001; 76: 1100-1106.
  • 11. Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Koatsu ND. Unprofessional behaviour in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 2004; 79: 244-249.
  • 12. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2673-2682.
  • 13. Papadakis MA, Arnold GK, Blank LL, et al. Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 869-876.
  • 14. McGurgan PM, Olsson-White D, Holgate M, Carmody D. Fitness-to-practise policies in Australian medical schools — are they fit for purpose? Med J Aust 2010; 193: 665-667. <MJA full text>
  • 15. General Medical Council (UK); Medical Schools Council (UK). Medical students: professional behaviour and fitness to practise. http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/professional_behaviour.asp (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 16. McAllister S, Lincoln M, Ferguson A, McAllister L. COMPASS: competency assessment in speech pathology. Melbourne: Speech Pathology Association of Australia, 2006.
  • 17. University of Queensland Medical Society [website]. http://uqms.org (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 18. Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld) ss 5, 86-93, 143-144.
  • 19. Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand [website]. http://www.medicaldeans.org.au (accessed Mar 2010).
  • 20. Association of Teachers of Ethics and Law in Australian and New Zealand Medical Schools (ATEAM). An ethics core curriculum for Australasian medical schools. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 205-210.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.