It is time to reconsider the clinical benefits arising from family history and start making better use of it
A patient’s family history may aid clinical diagnosis and contribute to disease risk assessment and prediction. It frequently yields valuable social history, including information about family support structures and insights into individual beliefs about illness.1 Although taking family history is traditionally regarded as a routine part of the medical history, it is not used in a systematic way in clinical practice. In this issue of the Journal, Langlands and colleagues report the results of an audit in an Australian teaching hospital, which found that nearly three-quarters of patients admitted to a short-stay medical unit had no documentation of family history having been considered as part of the diagnostic assessment.2 A similar situation exists in primary care. Although there are no published comparable data from Australian general practice, a primary care study in the United States found that only 16% of subjects (n = 362) had any record of their family history in their clinical chart, including 15 individuals at high risk of an inherited cancer syndrome.3
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Harris MF. The family history. Aust Fam Physician 1985; 14: 399-400.
- 2. Langlands AR, Prentice DA, Ravine D. A retrospective audit of family history records in short-stay medical admissions. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 682-684.
- 3. Sweet KM, Bradley TL, Westman JA. Identification and referral of families at high risk for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 528-537.
- 4. Berg AO, Baird MA, Botkin JR, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: family history and improving health. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 872-877.
- 5. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 2001; 358: 1389-1399.
- 6. Johns LE, Houlston RS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2992-3003.
- 7. Williams RR, Hunt SC, Heiss G, et al. Usefulness of cardiovascular family history data for population-based preventive medicine and medical research (the Health Family Tree Study and the NHLBI Family Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 129-135.
- 8. National Health Priority Action Council. National service improvement framework for diabetes. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006.
- 9. Kannel WB. Risk stratification in hypertension: new insights from the Framingham Study. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13 (1 Pt 2): 3S-10S.
- 10. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Strigo TS. Relationships among objective and subjective risk for breast cancer and mammography stages of change. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996; 5: 1005-1011.
- 11. Clavel-Chapelon F, Joseph R, Goulard H. Surveillance behavior of women with a reported family history of colorectal cancer. Prev Med 1999; 28: 174-178.
- 12. Manne S, Fasanella N, Connors J, et al. Sun protection and skin surveillance practices among relatives of patients with malignant melanoma: prevalence and predictors. Prev Med 2004; 39: 36-47.
- 13. Reid GT, Walter FM, Brisbane JM, Emery JD. Family history questionnaires designed for clinical use: a systematic review. Public Health Genomics 2009; 12: 73-83.
- 14. Murff HJ, Spigel DR, Syngal S. Does this patient have a family history of cancer? An evidence-based analysis of the accuracy of family cancer history. JAMA 2004; 292: 1480-1489.
- 15. Emery J, Morris H, Goodchild R, et al. The GRAIDS Trial: a cluster randomised controlled trial of computer decision support for the management of familial cancer risk in primary care. Br J Cancer 2007; 97: 486-493.
- 16. Dunlop K, Barlow-Stewart K. ‘Start the Conversation’: the New South Wales (Australia) Family Health History Campaign. Public Health Genomics 2009 Oct 26 [Epub ahead of print].
David Ravine is an author of the article that is the subject of this editorial.