|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | MJA Careers | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ For editorial comment, see Pesce
→ More articles on Obstetrics and gynaecology and womens health
→ More articles on Administration and health services
→ Other articles have cited this article
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
→ Click here for subscription options
To examine differences in outcomes between planned home births, occurring at home or in hospital, and planned hospital births.
Population-based study using South Australian perinatal data on all births and perinatal deaths during the period 1991–2006. Analysis included logistic regression adjusted for predictor variables and standardised perinatal mortality ratios.
Perinatal death, intrapartum death, death attributed to intrapartum asphyxia, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, use of specialised neonatal care, operative delivery, perineal injury and postpartum haemorrhage.
Planned home births accounted for 0.38% of 300 011 births in South Australia. They had a perinatal mortality rate similar to that for planned hospital births (7.9 v 8.2 per 1000 births), but a sevenfold higher risk of intrapartum death (95% CI, 1.53–35.87) and a 27-fold higher risk of death from intrapartum asphyxia (95% CI, 8.02–88.83). Review of perinatal deaths in the planned home births group identified inappropriate inclusion of women with risk factors for home birth and inadequate fetal surveillance during labour. Low Apgar scores were more frequent among planned home births, and use of specialised neonatal care as well as rates of postpartum haemorrhage and severe perineal tears were lower among planned home births, but these differences were not statistically significant. Planned home births had lower caesarean section and instrumental delivery rates, and a seven times lower episiotomy rate than planned hospital births.
Login or register to purchase access to the full article
|
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | MJA Careers | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2009 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377