mja.com.au | The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | MJA shop | MJA Careers | Contact | Topics | Search | RSS  | Login | Buy full access

Editorials

The National Hand Hygiene Initiative

M Lindsay Grayson and Philip L Russo
MJA 2009; 191 (8): 420-421

Implementing a hand hygiene program nationally requires a culture change

Given the evidence supporting the dramatic efficacy of hand hygiene (HH) culture-change programs and use of alcohol-based hand rub (AHR) solution worldwide and locally,1-4 a national HH initiative has been launched by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, with the support of all states and territories. Although some jurisdictions have already undertaken programs in this important area,2-5 including some impressive studies described in the supplement to this issue of the Journal,6-9 this national program, organised by Hand Hygiene Australia (HHA), aims to introduce a standard HH culture-change program throughout all Australian public and private hospitals. The aims of the program are to improve HH compliance, increase the use of AHR, and establish a common system of measuring the disease outcomes associated with improved HH that can be used by hospitals to compare their performance against national and international benchmarks. The HHA program has three crucial components.

1. Use of the World Health Organization’s “5 Moments for hand hygiene” program: Adoption and adaptation of the WHO’s 5 Moments HH culture-change program has been important, as it includes a standard HH compliance auditing tool that defines the five key moments at which hand-cleaning is required during patient care (Box).10 Although some Australian states previously had their own “home-grown” auditing tools, the HHA–WHO 5 Moments tool has the advantages of simplicity and validated clinical accuracy. Moreover, it allows HH rates in Australian hospitals to be compared internationally with rates in other hospitals that have similar health care systems. The HHA has developed detailed educational tools, including a popular website (http://www.hha.org.au). In close partnership with health departments in each state and territory, it has conducted multiple training workshops throughout Australia to implement the HH culture-change program, which is controlled and coordinated by the states.

2. Validation of HH compliance educators and assessors: Fundamental to obtaining accurate HH compliance data has been the development of a standard training and validation program for infection control practitioners and other health care workers responsible for HH culture change. The training program prepares them to accurately and reproducibly teach and measure HH compliance using the 5 Moments tool in their hospitals. This validation feature has been crucial to ensuring that all HH compliance data are accurate and comparable between hospitals and between health services in different states.

3. Measurement of hospital-acquired infections: A key reason for improving HH compliance among health care workers is to reduce the risk of nosocomial disease transmission, yet there has been no system in Australia for accurately measuring the incidence of these infections. An important outcome measure for the HHA program is the monthly reporting by all Australian hospitals of the rate of new hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) infections. The number of SAB infections (methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant) occurring more than 48 hours after hospital admission is standardised against hospital activity (occupied bed-days and patient separations [discharges]). Although the relationship between nosocomial SAB infections and HH practice is not exactly defined, it is estimated that in Australia about 60% of SAB infections are probably directly related to poor HH.2,3 Thus, SAB data are likely to be a valid outcome measure for HH compliance. The SAB reporting system established by HHA is internationally unique and will potentially provide a useful template upon which any future expanded national system of nosocomial disease measurement could be based.

The roll-out of the HHA program has progressed rapidly, with initial data submission by all regions commencing in early 2009 and subsequently ramping up quickly, to the extent that in the second audit period (July 2009), 168 hospitals submitted data.

The National Hand Hygiene Initiative is an internationally unique culture-change program that will hopefully not only improve HH compliance and reduce the risk of nosocomial disease transmission, but also establish a standard system for accurately recording rates of key hospital-acquired infections.

The HHA–WHO “5 Moments for hand hygiene”*


HHA = Hand Hygiene Australia. WHO = World Health Organization. * Adapted from Sax et al.10

Competing interests

One AHR solution currently marketed in Australia (DeBug [Orion Laboratories, Perth, WA]) was co-developed by Lindsay Grayson with partial funding from the Victorian Department of Human Services. The intellectual property for this development is held by Austin Health, which handles all patent, trademark and licensing issues. Austin Health, but neither author, receives a small income stream from the sale of DeBug.

Author detailsM Lindsay Grayson, MD, MSc, FRACP, DirectorPhilip L Russo, BN, MClinEpid, National Project Manager, Hand Hygiene Australia

Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC.

Correspondence: Lindsay.GraysonATaustin.org.au

References
  1. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme. Lancet 2000; 356: 1307-1312. <PubMed>
  2. Johnson PDR, Martin R, Burrell LJ, et al. Efficacy of an alcohol/chlorhexidine hand hygiene program in a hospital with high rates of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Med J Aust 2005; 183: 509-514. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  3. Grayson ML, Jarvie LJ, Martin R, et al. Significant reductions in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and clinical isolates associated with a multisite, hand hygiene culture-change program and subsequent successful statewide roll-out. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 633-640. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  4. Grayson ML, Melvani S, Druce J, et al. Efficacy of soap and water and alcohol-based hand-rub preparations against live H1N1 influenza virus on the hands of human volunteers. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48: 285-291. <PubMed>
  5. Clinical Excellence Commission, NSW Health. Clean hands save lives: final report of the NSW Hand Hygiene Campaign. Sydney: NSW Health, 2007. http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/moreinfo/cleanhands_report.html (accessed Aug 2009).
  6. Pantle AC, Fitzpatrick KR, McLaws ML, Hughes CF. A statewide approach to systematising hand hygiene behaviour in hospitals: Clean hands save lives, Part I. Med J Aust 2009; 191 (8 Suppl): S8-S12. <eMJA full text>
  7. Fitzpatrick KR, Pantle AC, McLaws ML, Hughes CF. Culture change for hand hygiene: Clean hands save lives, Part II. Med J Aust 2009; 191 (8 Suppl): S13-S17. <eMJA full text>
  8. McLaws ML, Pantle AC, Fitzpatrick KR, Hughes CF. Improvements in hand hygiene across New South Wales public hospitals: Clean hands save lives, Part III. Med J Aust 2009; 191 (8 Suppl): S18-S25. <eMJA full text>
  9. McLaws ML, Pantle AC, Fitzpatrick KR, Hughes CF. More than hand hygiene is needed to affect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical indicator rates: Clean hands save lives, Part IV. Med J Aust 2009; 191 (8 Suppl): S26-S31. <eMJA full text>
  10. Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uckay I, et al. “My five moments for hand hygiene”: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 2007; 67: 9-21. <PubMed>

Home | Issues | MJA shop | Terms of use | MJA Careers | More... | Contact | Topics | Search | RSS 

mja.com.au | The Medical Journal of Australia  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2009 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377