eMJA: Private obstetric intervention: good, bad or whatever?

Editorials

Private obstetric intervention: good, bad or whatever?

Andrew F Pesce

MJA 2009; 190 (9): 467-468

Challenging the assumption that higher rates of intervention provide no benefits for babies

Hardly a week seems to pass in Australia without an article in national newspapers drawing attention to the differences in obstetric intervention rates between private patients cared for by obstetricians and public patients who receive various models of care.1 The reported assumption has consistently been that the higher intervention rates observed in private patients are of no benefit to women or their babies, and possibly cause harm. This opinion has inevitably led to suggestions that federal support for private obstetric care be scaled back and redirected to models of care with lower intervention rates.2

NB: If you are registered with the eMJA, your username is the email address you have provided.
If you don't have a login, click here for subscription options. You will be prompted to create an account upon purchase.

AMA members can login using their AMA username and password.
If you don't know your AMA password, please contact the AMA on 02 6270 5400 or membership@ama.com.au, or try to retrieve your password at this address.

The Medical Journal of Australia eMJA

Username:
Password:

Password forgotten? Click here What is my username?