|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ For editorial comment, see Jansen and Dill
→ More articles on Ethics
→ Other articles have cited this article
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
Sperm removal and dead or dying patients: a dilemma for emergency departments and intensive care units
Introduction
—Case scenario 1
—Regulating the harvesting of sperm
—Regulating the use of sperm
—Exporting the sperm
—Case scenario 2
—Regulating consent for sperm harvest on a patient’s behalf
—Subsequent use of the sperm
—Discussion
—The issue of consent
—Conclusion
—Competing interests
—Author details
—References
An unexpected consequence of the increase in the use of fertility treatment is that emergency department and intensive care doctors are receiving requests from wives (actual or de facto) of dying or recently deceased men for sperm removal.
Legislation in all states and territories regulates removal of sperm from a dying man and, provided that lawful consent is obtained, a doctor can harvest sperm.
In several states, including Victoria, harvested sperm cannot be used in a fertilisation procedure without the man’s consent, and debate surrounds the issue of consent and how it can be proved.
Recent Victorian Law Reform Commission recommendations attempt to streamline the law to make a man’s consent the cornerstone of decision making for both harvesting and subsequent use of sperm.
Login or register to purchase access to the full article
|
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2009 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377