|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Social issues
→ More articles on Administration and health services
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
→ Register for free access if you don't have an account
Introduction
—Methods
—Survey design and sampling strategy
—Ethics approval
—Survey instrument
—Statistical analysis
—Results
—Psychometric properties of attitude ratings
—Demographic data
—Trust and attitude ratings
—Age differences in trust and attitude ratings
—Education differences in trust and attitude ratings
—Private health cover differences in trust and attitude ratings
—Discussion
—Acknowledgements
—Competing interests
—Author details
—References
A cross-sectional national telephone survey of a random sample of 800 Australian adults in August 2007.
Ratings of subjective trust in health care providers, public and private hospitals, private health insurers and Medicare; attitudinal ratings for the current health care system, and public and private health care systems.
Australians reported high trust in doctors (general practitioners more than specialists), low trust in alternative practitioners, moderate trust in hospitals (private more than public), and greater trust in Medicare than in private health insurers. Older adults had the greatest trust in physicians, hospitals and Medicare, but all age groups held similar attitudes toward public and private health care systems. Support for the current health care system with its mix of public and private funding was moderately strong, but all respondents reported weak pro-private attitudes and very strong pro-public attitudes.
Login or register for free access to the full article
|
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377