eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Letters

Health technology assessment in Australia

Brendon J Kearney and Stephen L Blamey
MJA 2008; 188 (8): 495

To the Editor: We read with interest the recent editorial and articles on health technology assessment.1-4 We are pleased that the Journal highlighted this important policy process that attempts to ensure that technologies that improve health gain or health care are supported and those that do not contribute to an improved outcome are not supported.

The description of HealthPACT in the editorial1 is not quite accurate in that HealthPACT is a subcommittee of the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). Its funding comes through MSAC with some supplementation from the Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Committee. The techniques of early detection and horizon scanning have been developed, and the results of this work are available to the health community of Australia, be it jurisdictional, public, private or specialised. In particular, if promising health care technologies are identified through this process, they are referred to MSAC for a full health technology assessment, thus ensuring that appropriate technologies are identified as early as possible in the technology cycle and are assessed by MSAC for introduction into the health care system.

This horizon-scanning activity does not currently involve drugs or vaccines, and the Australian health care system could benefit from this process, just as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the United Kingdom and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health undertake comprehensive horizon scanning.

With respect to conflicts of interest, MSAC is very specific at all levels of its operation. At the commencement of every advisory panel and MSAC meeting, the Chair requests declaration of conflicts of interest. These are recorded in the minutes and appropriate decisions are made on the participation of the person declaring a conflict based on an assessment of the issue.

This is formal and explicit, and is on the public record. It is important to state this, as the article by Petherick and colleagues implies that MSAC does not record conflicts of interest.4 In fact, MSAC places great importance on declaration of conflicts of interest.

Brendon J Kearney, Director1Stephen L Blamey, Chair2

1 Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, SA.

2 Medical Services Advisory Committee, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, ACT.

brendon.kearneyATimvs.sa.gov.au

  1. Jackson TJ. Health technology assessment in Australia: challenges ahead [editorial]. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 262-264. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  2. Walley T. Health technology assessment in England: assessment and appraisal. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 283-285. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  3. Hailey DM. Health technology assessment in Canada: diversity and evolution. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 286-288. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  4. Petherick ES, Villanueva EV, Dumville J, et al. An evaluation of methods used in health technology assessments produced for the Medical Services Advisory Committee. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 289-292. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>

(Received 11 Sep 2007, accepted 22 Nov 2007)

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377