|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ For editorial comment, see Studdert. See also Evans et al.
→ More articles on Oncology
→ Other articles have cited this article
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
→ Register for free access if you don't have an account
To explore the involvement of members of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Section of Breast Surgery in Australia and New Zealand in multidisciplinary care (MDC) teams.
Questionnaire sent to all full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery in December 2006.
239 of 262 active full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery (response rate, 91.2%).
Surgeons’ use of, and the composition and functioning of, MDC teams in public and private practice, and in metropolitan, regional and rural settings.
85% of responding surgeons reported participating in at least one fully established MDC team. Public-sector teams were operationally more consistent and functional than private teams, and rural teams were less well developed than those in metropolitan and regional centres. The six core disciplines recommended by the National Breast Cancer Centre appear to be well represented in most teams. Patients and their general practitioners were not considered to be part of the treatment team by surgeons.
Login or register for free access to the full article
|
David M Studdert. Can liability rules keep pace with best practice?
The case of multidisciplinary cancer care Med J Aust 2008; 188 (7): 380-381. [Editorials] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/188_07_070408/stu10039_fm.html>
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377