eMJA: NHMRC grant applications: a comparison of “track record” scores allocated by grant assessors with bibliometric analysis of publications

To the Editor: Predicting research quality on the basis of past research publications is clearly imprecise, as noted by Nicol et al in their recent article on National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grant applications.1 They note that assessor ratings of applicants’ “track records” correspond poorly with the bibliometric data for authors, and that there is vast variability between discipline panels. For immunology, the correlation between track record scores and journal impact or citations was high, at over 0.7. For public health, the correlation was actually negative.

NB: If you are registered with the eMJA, your username is the email address you have provided.
AMA members can login using their AMA username and password.

If you don't have a login, click here to register for immediate free access

The Medical Journal of Australia eMJA

Username:
Password:

Password forgotten? Click here What is my username?