eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Letters

Lack of consistency in safe-sleeping messages to parents

Roger W Byard, Glenda Cains, Helen Noblet and Maxine Weber
MJA 2007; 187 (1): 62

To the Editor: V-shaped pillows (“tri-pillows”) may cause suffocation of an infant left to sleep between the two arms of the pillow when he or she slips into the crevice between the arms, or beneath the pillow. The deaths of two infants who died in this manner were reported in South Australia in 1997, and a third death was the subject of a coronial inquiry.1,2 In 1998, the SA State Coroner recommended that “a public warning be issued against the use of tri- or U-shaped pillows by infants under two years of age for sleeping”.2 This message has also been issued in subsequent safe-sleeping campaigns, with a statement in the SIDS and Kids national “Safe sleeping” brochure that “tri-pillows are too soft and can cover baby’s face”, and a statement on the SA Child and Youth Health website that “. . . babies should not be left in these pillows while they are sleeping”.4 Despite these clear messages, deaths continue to occur in SA,5 and V-shaped pillows are still being sold in the foyer of a local obstetric hospital. Although the pillows are being promoted to assist breastfeeding, infants who have been left to sleep on them will be exposed to the risk of suffocation.

Deaths of infants in shared sleeping situations may also occur due to suffocation from “overlaying”. However, parents are still being advised by health advice telephone enquiry services to sleep in the same bed with their children. This was the unequivocal message given to one of the authors (G C) when she recently telephoned for advice following the birth of her first child. No mention was made of the potential danger of suffocation if parents are physically large, intoxicated, sedated, or simply exhausted, or if the infant is placed between the parents under bedcovers.

It appears, despite clear evidence that certain sleeping situations are potentially dangerous for infants, as well as the widespread dissemination of this information in safe-sleeping literature, that certain organisations or individuals continue to give a contrary message. What hope do parents have of understanding these issues and making informed decisions to optimise the safety of their infant’s sleeping environment if they are exposed to such conflicting messages and advice? Perhaps another question to ask is, “What responsibility do organisations and employees bear if an infant dies as a result of parents following such advice or purchasing equipment such as a V-shaped pillow?”

Roger W Byard, George Richard Marks Professor of Pathology1Glenda Cains, Mortuary Team Leader2Helen Noblet, Executive Officer3Maxine Weber, Executive Director4

1 Discipline of Pathology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.

2 Forensic Science SA, Adelaide, SA.

3 Kidsafe SA, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, SA.

4 SIDS and Kids, Adelaide, SA.

roger.byardATadelaide.edu.au

  1. Byard RW, Beal SM. V-shaped pillows and unsafe infant sleeping. J Paediatr Child Health 1997; 33: 171-173. <PubMed>
  2. Chivell W, State Coroner, South Australia. Finding of inquest No. 25/98. Coroner’s Court, Adelaide, SA, 25/6/1998.
  3. SIDS and Kids. Safe sleeping [brochure]. (Brochures available from SIDS and Kids, ph. 1300 308 307.)
  4. Child and Youth Health, Government of South Australia. Safe sleep. http://www.cyh.com/HealthTopics/HealthTopicDetails.aspx?p=114&np=305&id=1697 (accessed Apr 2007).
  5. Child Death and Serious Injury Review Committee. Annual report 2005–2006. Adelaide: Government of South Australia, 2006.

(Received 10 Dec 2006, accepted 10 Apr 2007)

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2007 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377