eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Letters

Antenatal care implications of population-based trends in Down syndrome birth rates

Caroline M De Costa and Cait Calcutt
MJA 2007; 186 (12): 663

To the Editor: A further reason for the differences in antenatal Down syndrome screening rates between urban and rural women, reported by Coory and colleagues,1 is likely to be the relative difficulties many Queensland women face in accessing abortion services. We are aware of several Queensland public hospitals that provide excellent antenatal screening services — testing for chromosomal abnormalities as well as providing the 18–20-week ultrasound scan for structural abnormalities. However, these hospitals do not offer subsequent counselling or abortion for women who make the difficult decision to terminate a pregnancy at this gestation, instead directing them to the private system. Some of these women are undoubtedly among the many Queensland women who travel interstate for abortions each year.2-5

First-trimester abortion is difficult to access for women in rural areas throughout Queensland. This is probably an important factor in women making the decision not to have early screening and/or chorionic villus biopsy, and possibly also a factor in doctors not offering it. Having to travel several hundred kilometres for the test, with the possibility of a further journey for an abortion, is beyond the resources of many rural women.

We are in agreement with Coory et al that a majority of the population would support equity of access to services and equal choices for all women in the matter of antenatal screening for fetal abnormality. In fact, amniocentesis for chromosomal abnormalities has been available, with little controversy, for more than 30 years. If early antenatal screening is made available to all women, then it is reasonable to expect that appropriate counselling and access to safe, affordable abortion is also provided.

Caroline M De Costa, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology1Cait Calcutt, Coordinator2

1 James Cook University, Cairns, QLD.

2 Children by Choice, Brisbane, QLD.

caroline.decostaATjcu.edu.au

  1. Coory M, Roselli T, Carroll H. Antenatal care implications of population-based trends in Down syndrome birth rates by rurality and antenatal care provider, Queensland, 1990–2004. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 230-234. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  2. Nickson C, Smith AM, Shelley JM. Travel undertaken by women accessing private Victorian pregnancy termination services. Aust N Z J Public Health 2006; 30: 329-333. <PubMed>
  3. Chan A, Sage LC. Estimating Australia’s abortion rates 1985–2003. Med J Aust 2005; 182: 447-452. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  4. Nickson C, Smith AM, Shelley JM. Intention to claim a Medicare rebate among women receiving private Victorian pregnancy termination services. Aust N Z J Public Health 2004; 28: 120-123. <PubMed>
  5. Adelson PL, Frommer MS, Weisberg E. A survey of women seeking termination of pregnancy in New South Wales. Med J Aust 1995; 163: 419-422. <PubMed>

(Received 24 Mar 2007, accepted 5 Apr 2007)

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2007 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377