Tackling the problems of men’s health requires a comprehensive national policy
Health care service delivery takes into account many patient factors, such as age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status — and sex. While the place of “women’s health” is now well established in health care, many contributors to this special men’s health issue of the Journal believe that “men’s health” has not received sufficient, specific attention. Are they right?
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 The Medical Journal of Australia, Sydney, NSW.
- 2 Sydney Men’s Health, Sydney, NSW.
- 3 School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
- 1. Furler J. Action on health inequalities through general practice III: enhancing the role of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Melbourne: RACGP, 2005. http://www.racgp.org.au/Content/NavigationMenu/Advocacy/IssuesinGeneralPractice/Healthinequalities/inequalities.htm (accessed Sep 2006).
- 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Heart, stroke and vascular diseases, Australian facts 2004. Canberra: AIHW, 2004. (AIHW Catalogue No. CVD 27.)
- 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2001. Canberra: AIHW, 2004. (AIHW Catalogue No. CAN 23.)
- 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2004. Canberra: AIHW, 2004. (AIHW Catalogue No. AUS 44.)
- 5. Australian Medical Association. Position statement on men’s health. Canberra: AMA, 2005. http://www.ama.com.au/web.nsf/doc/WEEN-6B56Y2/$file/Mens_Health.pdf (accessed Sep 2006).
- 6. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Men’s health. Policy endorsed by the 48th RACGP Council 5 August 2006. Melbourne: RACGP, 2006. http://www.racgp.org.au/Content/NavigationMenu/Advocacy/RAC GPpositionstatements/200609MensHealth.pdf (accessed Sep 2006).