eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Letters

Driveway motor vehicle injuries in children: a prospective review of injury circumstances

MJA 2006; 184 (6): 311

Andrew J A Holland,* Frank I Ross, Patricia Manglick, Fiona E Fahy,§ Daniel T Cass

* Associate Professor of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, † Clinical Nurse Consultant, ‡ Scientific Officer, § Clinical Nurse Consultant, ¶ William Dunlop Professor of Paediatric Surgery and Director of Trauma, Department of Academic Surgery, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Locked Bay 4001, Westmead, NSW 2145. andrewh3ATchw.edu.au

To the Editor: Several studies from Australasia and North America have identified that in up to 24% of children with pedestrian motor vehicle injuries (MVIs) the event occurred in a driveway.1-4 Earlier work from our centre in Sydney and others in Auckland, New Zealand, highlighted prevention as the most effective method for reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with this unique mechanism of injury.2,3,5 With ethics committee approval, we prospectively reviewed injury circumstances in children under 16 years of age presenting with a driveway MVI to our institution over a 3-year period between June 2002 and May 2005.

Of 36 children injured in 35 separate driveway MVIs, 26 caregivers agreed to an interview and scene visit. Fifteen patients (58%) were male, with a mean age of 48 months. The majority of events occurred in western and south-western Sydney — a paediatric population centre — in the afternoon (18; 69%) and on a weekday (19; 73%), with a trend for greater frequency at the beginning and end of the working week. In all but two cases, the injury occurred at the child’s home, which was owned by the parents in 13 cases (50%; with a mean occupation period, 47 months) and rented in 10 (38%; mean occupation period, 22 months). The majority of homes (22; 85%) had no separation between the dwelling, external play areas and the driveway. Even when a separation was present, this had been circumvented. Sedans were the most common vehicle involved (18; 69%), with the remainder four-wheel drives (4WDs) or light commercial vehicles, and 22 (85%) were reversing. The vehicle was driven by an adult known to the child in 21 cases, but in four the vehicle was inadvertently set in motion by another child. Box 1 reports parental perception of contributing factors and Box 2 lists injuries sustained, with 23 (89%) children receiving injuries severe enough to warrant hospital admission. There were no deaths.

This review indicates that driveway MVIs persist as a common and potentially fatal problem for children in New South Wales, with at least one child injured every month.2 Following our previous study published in 2000, and findings of the NSW Child Death Review Team, campaigns by the Motor Accidents Authority of NSW and others have focused on driveway safety, particularly for young children. This review suggests that further intervention is needed to reduce the frequency of these injuries, either through enhanced application of present strategies or the development of more effective, novel approaches.

1 Parental perception of factors contributing to their child sustaining pedestrian motor vehicle injuries in the driveway

Lack of supervision

15

Child playing in parked car

5

Children’s behaviour around cars

5

Negligent driving

2

Excessive speed

2

Hand brake not applied

1

Front house door left open

1

Hurrying when leaving home

1

2 Injuries identified in children sustaining pedestrian motor vehicle injuries in the driveway

Head and neck

Skull fracture

1

Intracranial haematoma

1

Concussion

2

Retropharyngeal haematoma

1

Torso

Hepatic contusion

1

Adrenal haematoma

1

Haemopneumothorax

1

Multiple rib fractures

1

Pelvic fracture

1

Major soft tissue injury

1

Limb

Fractures

2

Burns

Full thickness

4

Partial thickness

3

Major soft tissue injury

1

Minor soft tissue injury

17

Acknowledgement: This study was supported by a grant from the Motor Accidents Authority of NSW.

  1. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Bower RJ. Low velocity vehicular injuries in children — “run-over” accidents. Pediatrics 1980; 66: 628-631. <PubMed>
  2. Holland AJA, Liang RWY, Singh SJ, et al. Driveway motor vehicle injuries in children. Med J Aust 2000; 173: 192-195. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  3. Murphy F, White S, Morreau P. Driveway-related motor vehicle injuries in the paediatric population: a preventable tragedy. N Z Med J 2002; 23: U148.
  4. Roberts I, Norton R, Dunn R, et al. Environmental factors and child pedestrian injuries. Aust J Public Health 1994; 18: 43-46. <PubMed>
  5. Roberts I, Norton R, Jackson R. Driveway-related child pedestrian injuries: a case-control study. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 405-408. <PubMed>

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2006 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377